Originally Posted by
prop
Right that's the only argument there is not to pay the player. One side's story, and a bunch of bias put together with some limited suggestive strung evidence that when all pieced together has at least one, maybe more, extremely simple "no more / no less likely" possible explanation(s) exist for. But more so the reason not to pay is the fact simple: you don't like Cory. That's what you got.
Then the only ones who control the fate of the disputed cash start spreading the arbitrator of Cory's own choice concluded he bearded and the monkeys all repeat. As if the player didn't go to the only place anyone would go for assistance in a Heritage dispute and fill out a request for assistance. Player alleges the first dispute analysis to contact him was not interested in facts but in a less than friendly tone demanded a confession of his guilt. Where the arbitrator of choice spin comes in is at this point Cory contacted Heritage and asked Justin be assigned instead. At no time was this ever a hearing, it was not an arbitration, the player had no representation. During the spin that the player's arbitrator of his own choice was being repeated this almost went as far as saying he should of chosen Winner_13 to arbitrate instead. This was at the very least a dishonest sell.
During this time it's alleged Heritage Sports attempted a bullying attack on the player. There was this we have an expert looking at this but you need to shut up for 3 weeks and what strongly appears to be the suggestion of if you give us bad press on forums your chance of seeing a dime are diminished or at least greatly reduced. When confronted with this Heritage Insider made a statement that appears to be a lie, perhaps there's some room for semantics that we can call it dishonest.
We also have that in what was likely a PR attempt Heritage claimed that the disputed winnings are going to Cory's side or to charity. Repeated requests if concrete proof of such a donation should it get to that point will be provided have been continuously dodged. These requests were posted inside several back and forth dialogues and reiterated and even asked why the statement was dodged, to once again no response. All that was said is that they will go to charity several times. So again still waiting on that response, and forgive me for being a little sceptical with a company that made several attempts I perceive as highly dishonest to spin this story, not all of which are included in this post.
As time progressed Heritage Insider went as far to attempt to sell the player received a third party arbitration two times, once with Lou and once with Justin. Cory's rebuttal was along the lines of why doesn't Heritage just say my mother had three arbitrations the first is when she requested to be paid. He then clarifies his statement that all he did was fill out a complaint form, his guilt was assumed, a confession demanded so he asked for Justin to take over. This wasn't an arbitration and the sell an arbitrator of his own choice ruled against can at the very best be worded as a misleading sell.
Then we have the element of you can have a UK arbitrator as well. This is offered by the same person who jumped in right away to debate deposits should be taken too. This was then later sold by Heritage Insider as this super fair how great we are we went through 2 arbitrations already and we're such a super great company we're willing to give a third.
The problem with UK is several terms and conditions Justin7 has a history of not considering valid in disputes have been repeatedly upheld there. He and others have made critical statements about such terms in the past. The guys lobbying it's more than fair and that there were two arbitrations already are wrong. There was never a first, nor a second. There was a request for assistance and was a mediation which the player decided to stop participating in leading the mediator to have no choice in how he ruled (that part is fair, but at least one and maybe more "no more / no less likely" reason(s) for dropping out do(does) exists though, and it's too bad if they were not confronted sooner).
So no arbitrator has decided this dispute, no hearing took place, no totality of evidence was considered, and now it's being sold more than fair to give one final last recourse of agreeing to an arbitration in a country where the chances are stacked against him. He is not from that country, nor is the company is he is dealing with. Plus there's another big issue too, but will leave it at that for now. Sounds fair? Of course: because we don't like Cory.
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
Reply With Quote
how on earth did you read that into what I said.
.. do it better next time kid
