Threm VS Hareeba (on anything sportsbook idustry related)

[Hareeba!]

"i'm really not aware of have made any false statements" another outright fabrication. And this time with intent. He has dodged numerous comments from myself, mf, other assorted posters, and moderation regarding the veracity of his pinnacle comments.

This to me refrains his entire stance from one of just a simpleton to a willfully deceptive poster who repeatedly lies.

Is this why you wouldn't bet me? So you could continue to deceptively troll? Why wouldn't you take the free money? Oyah, because you have no basis for your ideas.

you have still to prove a single claim of lying, falsification or deception against me

and nor has anyone else despite numerous requests

[Hareeba!]

oyah, one of hareeba's fave lies is to lie about the definition of lie:

"
1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: his flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.

3. an inaccurate or false statement."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lie

given his grasp of the english language i'm not really surprised he doesn't understand more nuanced ideas. (sarcasm intended)

????? Are you seriously trying to say that the definition of lie which i posted is inaccurate in any way?

Anyone else find anything wrong with it?

[showtiime]

Sharpest post in this thread.

[Thremp]

It is hard to have a discussion with someone as dishonest and senile, but lie has multiple definitions. Conveying a false impression is also a lie. A false statement can be called a lie as well. There doesn't actually need to be intent, but you seem to struggle with English in general so whatever. We can use the definition you prefer. "you have still to prove a single claim of lying, falsification or deception against me" is also a lie. Justin7, myself, and others have commented that your views of both Pinnacle and liquidity of the rugby market is dishonest, wrong, and fabricated. There isn't a shred of truth in what you say about rugby.

But whatever. I've crushed you like a man would crush an ant without really being aware. You are a dishonest liar who won't even acknowledge Pinnacle's policy on US wagering.

But lemme spare you the trouble of your inane and dishonest reply: "I'm not here to discuss any of my delusional lies." If you weren't so senile, you'd realize that proving your lies required discussion of the specific topics you lied about, yet you are so stupid you can't even realize the error of your ways when multiple people post that you're wrong and deceiving people.

Good luck in your future (however little may be left of it), the world will be a better place with less people like you.

[Hareeba!]

It is hard to have a discussion with someone as dishonest and senile, but lie has multiple definitions. Conveying a false impression is also a lie. A false statement can be called a lie as well. There doesn't actually need to be intent, but you seem to struggle with English in general so whatever. We can use the definition you prefer. "you have still to prove a single claim of lying, falsification or deception against me" is also a lie. Justin7, myself, and others have commented that your views of both Pinnacle and liquidity of the rugby market is dishonest, wrong, and fabricated. There isn't a shred of truth in what you say about rugby.

But whatever. I've crushed you like a man would crush an ant without really being aware. You are a dishonest liar who won't even acknowledge Pinnacle's policy on US wagering.

But lemme spare you the trouble of your inane and dishonest reply: "I'm not here to discuss any of my delusional lies." If you weren't so senile, you'd realize that proving your lies required discussion of the specific topics you lied about, yet you are so stupid you can't even realize the error of your ways when multiple people post that you're wrong and deceiving people.

Good luck in your future (however little may be left of it), the world will be a better place with less people like you.

A statement which isn't correct CANNOT be called a LIE unless it is intended to deceive.

Does anybody else disagree with me?

Now you start talking about a rugby market?

I have absolutely no idea what you're on about with that one.

Please provide a link so that I and others can get on top of that one.

I'll acknowledge Pinnacle's policy when I see you post some evidence of it. In the meantime, not because YOU say so, I'm prepared to accept that it may be so. BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT I'VE LIED ABOUT THE ISSUE.

Why aren't you accusing SBR of lying for showing a US flag with a slash through it alongside Pinnacle on its review page?

And what about the numerous posters who have said "wish Pinnacle would allow US players again"?

AND STILL YOU HAVEN'T PROVIDED EVIDENCE LET ALONE PROOF OF ANY POST WHERE I'VE LIED.

And Justin, may have disagreed with me on some things but I don't recall him ever calling me a liar. I'd have been all over him had he done so.

[brettels]

You two should weigh into a new subject. Lets see how long before the circling happens.

Start with this one, http://forum.sbrforum.com/sportsbook...l#post14789278

[Thremp]

So Hareeba, now you're accusing dictionary.com of being inaccurate? Apparently you seem to be very delusional. Why are you so bad at English? lol. Anyone who isn't a mouthbreather would disagree with you.

I quoted rugby prices in order to correct your view of Betfair being a better market. You were wrong. Again, you ask for repeated "evidence" to the same shit I repeatedly say/link. Is this really your defense? Just saying "ALALLALALALAL I DO NOT SEE IT. PROVE IT" Even the mongos who inhabit the Saloon can tell you're wrong.

I don't have to correct every error on the internet. Perhaps this is your advanced age getting to you again, but your spurious comments make NO ******* SENSE. You are either a ******* idiot or a ******* liar. Given the recent posts, the latter is a massive fave over the former.

Take my wager, I hate money. Oyah, you lie about your results as well. Pretending you beat massive, liquid markets, but aren't swimming in pools of Moet. Good1.

[Hareeba!]

So Hareeba, now you're accusing dictionary.com of being inaccurate? Apparently you seem to be very delusional. Why are you so bad at English? lol. Anyone who isn't a mouthbreather would disagree with you.

I quoted rugby prices in order to correct your view of Betfair being a better market. You were wrong. Again, you ask for repeated "evidence" to the same shit I repeatedly say/link. Is this really your defense? Just saying "ALALLALALALAL I DO NOT SEE IT. PROVE IT" Even the mongos who inhabit the Saloon can tell you're wrong.

I don't have to correct every error on the internet. Perhaps this is your advanced age getting to you again, but your spurious comments make NO ******* SENSE. You are either a ******* idiot or a ******* liar. Given the recent posts, the latter is a massive fave over the former.

Take my wager, I hate money. Oyah, you lie about your results as well. Pretending you beat massive, liquid markets, but aren't swimming in pools of Moet. Good1.

No idea what "dictionary.com" says .. probably some Yank thing

My language is English.

Oxford Dictionary ..... "an intentionally false statement"

Macquarie Dictionary .... "false statement made with intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; something intended or serving to convey a false impression."

I have no recollection of an argument over rugby prices. I do recall one argument over Betfair v Pinnacle odds and you were proven wrong because you failed to take into account the Betfair lay price. Can't recall what the event was .. may have been rugby but highly unlikely as Betfair's only liquid rugby markets are 3-way whereas Pinnacle's are 2-way.

All utterly irrelevant anyway as the only thing I've been pressing for is PROOF OF YOUR ACCUSATIONS.

Must be 200 times now I've asked and yet still no proof at all. I've even asked for people to help you out but still nobody can find any evidence of a lie in any of my posts.

The only possible conclusion from that is my innocence of all accusations.

[Thremp]

This is why every single person who's chimed in on this has supported you... right?

Oh wait. Not a single rooster_eater has come out and supported you. lol. Clearly everyone is crazy.

PS: "something intended or serving to convey a false impression" Hrm. Like claiming you beat liquid markets? Yet don't? And are p00r. lol imo. You don't pass the smell test to anyone who's made more than 15c.

[brettels]

This is just going to keep going in circles(like 99% of hareeba conversations), I'm happy to see this thread locked and gone now.

[Thremp]

It should stay and get bumped as a testament to his dishonesty.

[brettels]

I just bumped a thread in the sports and industry section for your interest.

[Parlayking11]

You both should just blow each other and get it over with .... The sexual tension between the two of you is undeniable....

[Hareeba!]

This is why every single person who's chimed in on this has supported you... right?

Oh wait. Not a single rooster_eater has come out and supported you. lol. Clearly everyone is crazy.

PS: "something intended or serving to convey a false impression" Hrm. Like claiming you beat liquid markets? Yet don't? And are p00r. lol imo. You don't pass the smell test to anyone who's made more than 15c.

Show me where?
Or is that just another of your fabrications?
Extraordinarily unlikely I've ever made such a claim as I don't even understand which markets you define as "liquid".
And if I do or don't how the fuk would you know anyway?
Or have you somehow managed to hack into my database?

And where are all throngs supporting you?
NOBODY has responded to my call for people to assist you to find any lies posted by me.

Your biggest supporters are the SBR moderators who shamefully continue to permit you to post unfounded accusations with impunity.

[brettels]

The moderators are very lenient on you too hareeba! Stop sooking.

[Hareeba!]

The moderators are very lenient on you too hareeba! Stop sooking.

If standing up steadfastly in an endeavour to defend myself and my reputation is "sooking" in your view then so be it.

All I am doing is demanding a fair go in that regard and despite Shari agreeing with my stance a week ago she has now strangely done a back-flip.

I suggest that unless you have some value to add to it you keep out of this issue.

[hawley]

RU serious?

I happen to value my reputation.

All my professional and business working life I sought to protect it and never once was my integrity called into question.

Only since becomming involved in the SBR forum have I had to endure such libellous attacks.

Would you just simply put up with them being directed at you?

I don't know you so maybe I am missing something here but this is an online forum.

Do you honestly care about your reputation on here? do you associate with people on here that you associate with in real life?

Could someone by chance identify who you are outside of the forum by your handle?

People can say anything they want about me on here it doesn't phase me. It's what happens in the real world that I am concerned with.

[Hareeba!]

I don't know you so maybe I am missing something here but this is an online forum.

Do you honestly care about your reputation on here? do you associate with people on here that you associate with in real life?

Could someone by chance identify who you are outside of the forum by your handle?

People can say anything they want about me on here it doesn't phase me. It's what happens in the real world that I am concerned with.

Yes.

And even if not, what's the point in attempting to be a genuine contributor to a forum if one's reputation can be subjected to such defamation with impunity as I've had to tolerate?

[hawley]

Yes.

And even if not, what's the point in attempting to be a genuine contributor to a forum if one's reputation is subjected to such defamation as I've had to tolerate?

Good luck in trying to clear your name then.

[brettels]

A shill trying to clear there name, you may need professional help with that.

[Hareeba!]

A shill trying to clear there name, you may need professional help with that.

You've already been advised by a moderator that that is a lie.

So just another worthless, lying and irrelevant post.

[Gee]

What is going on here?

Who does Hareeba work for? We need these things to be out in the open.

[Hareeba!]

What is going on here?

Who does Hareeba work for? We need these things to be out in the open.

What is going on is that the cowardly Thremp and a couple of other childish types are attempting to destroy my reputation with a campaign of lies, false accusations and insults whilst the moderators are standing by doing sfa about it.

Hareeba has worked for nobody but himself for close on 7 years now.

[baskets]

I haven't been following this.... and I don't really care either way.

The only confirmed shill I know of.... well, that'd be 5mike5. He's been taking out 10k a week p2p from 5dimes for 20 straight weeks. I'm not too good with the math, but I think he's taken out 200k from 5dimes in the last 5 months.

Did I get the math right, 5mike?


10k/wk ... X ... 20 wks ... = $200,000.00 in last 5 months from 5dimes

[Thremp]

It would be nice if Hareeba stopped his "contributions" in the sense of repeatedly posting incorrect and dishonest information with no ability or desire to learn.

Look at how many people have corrected him about Pinnacle, yet he won't answer basic questions. Do you know they have a credit side? Do you know anything about this?

He will just say "I don't want to discuss it" than admit there are people who know a shit ton more about the issue at hand than him. Go back to dishonestly shilling betfair.

[Hareeba!]

it would be nice if hareeba stopped his "contributions" in the sense of repeatedly posting incorrect and dishonest information with no ability or desire to learn.

Look at how many people have corrected him about pinnacle, yet he won't answer basic questions. Do you know they have a credit side? Do you know anything about this?

He will just say "i don't want to discuss it" than admit there are people who know a shit ton more about the issue at hand than him. Go back to dishonestly shilling betfair.

irrelevant to my case
not interested in discussing further
have already made as much comment on that issue as is appropriate

just prove your accusations or stfu

[Thremp]

It is central as it gets to the core of whether you're just a dipshit or a liar.

Given your coverup. Liar is a massive fave. A conclusion that everyone on this board agrees with. I'm glad you understand your credibility is rapidly falling. It should. Liars are eventually always exposed. You repeatedly sheeple bleeting isn't going to work because people know THE TRUTH.

I've proven my accusations from Day 1. It is evident in all of your posts. It I expand to logical inferences from your comments (like you accused shari), virtually all of your posts are some form of dishonest shilltarding.

[Hareeba!]

It is central as it gets to the core of whether you're just a dipshit or a liar.

Given your coverup. Liar is a massive fave. A conclusion that everyone on this board agrees with. I'm glad you understand your credibility is rapidly falling. It should. Liars are eventually always exposed. You repeatedly sheeple bleeting isn't going to work because people know THE TRUTH.

I've proven my accusations from Day 1. It is evident in all of your posts. It I expand to logical inferences from your comments (like you accused shari), virtually all of your posts are some form of dishonest shilltarding.

"everyone on this board agrees with" - well there's really no need to go further because that is just the most obvious lie of all

[Thremp]

Quote one person who has unequivocally supported you on the Pinnacle issue.

[Hareeba!]

Quote one person who has unequivocally supported you on the Pinnacle issue.

The "Pinnacle issue" arose long after I challenged you to prove your accusations.

Name one other person who has labelled me a liar over that irrelevance to the issue at the core of this.

[Gee]

What is going on is that the cowardly Thremp and a couple of other childish types are attempting to destroy my reputation with a campaign of lies, false accusations and insults whilst the moderators are standing by doing sfa about it.

Hareeba has worked for nobody but himself for close on 7 years now.

What? Surely not? What does Thremp get out of all of this?

I heard in another thread that you really work for BetFair. Is this true? It would explain the hate.

Its alright. I don't think any more or any less of you out of all of this. Your reputation is still a steady non-existent consideration of mine.

[Hareeba!]

What? Surely not? What does Thremp get out of all of this?

I heard in another thread that you really work for BetFair. Is this true? It would explain the hate.

Its alright. I don't think any more or any less of you out of all of this. Your reputation is still a steady non-existent consideration of mine.

If that's so it just proves that there are REAL liars on this forum then.

If I had ever worked for Betfair I'd have been sacked long ago for posting some of the things I have about them.

[Thremp]

So you are contending you have become a liar recently? And weren't before.

Your brain is malfunctioning. Please see a doctor.

[brettels]

If that's so it just proves that there are REAL liars on this forum then.

If I had ever worked for Betfair I'd have been sacked long ago for posting some of the things I have about them.

You've never said a bad thing about them and lets not forget how you rage at people who don't bet with them. That is the main part, if people who can but do not bet with them you talk down to them.

[Hareeba!]

You've never said a bad thing about them and lets not forget how you rage at people who don't bet with them. That is the main part, if people who can do not bet with them you talk down to them.

Now there's another LIE!

I have posted several criticisms of them.

I don't "talk down" to them. I just try to understand why they won't and to educate them in how they could improve their punting by doing so.