You're a moron, plain and simple. I'm using "metrics" to elucidate how we arrived at the final score, the score would not constitute a metric in this context. Obviously I have to explain this to you because you're stupid.
Oregon won and covered last night. There is no debate there. But last night is one outcome in a sea of potential outcomes. My point is that +3.5 is +EV given the nature of the game, and I absolutely would take that risk 100% of the time in identical circumstances and live with the result.
I know you're a degenerate, horse-bangin' drunkard and all, but try and use that one brain cell you have.
Oregon won and covered last night. There is no debate there. But last night is one outcome in a sea of potential outcomes. My point is that +3.5 is +EV given the nature of the game, and I absolutely would take that risk 100% of the time in identical circumstances and live with the result.
I know you're a degenerate, horse-bangin' drunkard and all, but try and use that one brain cell you have.