If Censorship is not the answer then heavy fines and/or jail time should be employed.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slewfan
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 10-01-15
    • 15901

    #1
    If Censorship is not the answer then heavy fines and/or jail time should be employed.

    Our ‘experts’ justify censorship of actual news with fake science to help Democrats

  • ByeShea
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 06-30-08
    • 8093

    #2
    Media outlets are so in the tank for Democratic candidates that they can count on fluff pieces and opposition hit pieces without ever having to personally take their message to the people.

    Said Jake Tapper about Kamala Harris and Tim Walz:

    "I'm bewildered a little bit by the absence of both the presidential candidate and the vice presidential candidate on television since they became the nominees because that's how people get to know you and they haven't really spent a lot of time with either of them before now. So, I also think that it may be a little bit of a problem for Walz having not done this."

    Harris and Walz even blow off the people who provide them debate questions in advance.
    Comment
    • slewfan
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 10-01-15
      • 15901

      #3



      Hillary Clinton advocates restricting free speech rights for Americans

      Comment
      • VeggieDog
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 02-21-09
        • 7214

        #4
        If you're casting a vote AGAINST a candidate instead of a vote FOR a candidate, you're a moron and should just stay home.
        Comment
        • slewfan
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 10-01-15
          • 15901

          #5
          Originally posted by VeggieDog
          If you're casting a vote AGAINST a candidate instead of a vote FOR a candidate, you're a moron and should just stay home.
          Especially if the candidate your voting ''against'' has proven to be the better candidate.
          Comment
          • jackpot269
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 09-24-07
            • 12842

            #6
            Repeal 230 and let them do whatever they want with no protection. If they feel they want to restrict they can, if not it can be the wild wild west. Maybe if someone doesn't like the way they run their companies, they start their own and run it how they want.
            Comment
            • slewfan
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 10-01-15
              • 15901

              #7
              Originally posted by jackpot269
              repeal 230 and let them do whatever they want with no protection. If they feel they want to restrict they can, if not it can be the wild wild west. Maybe if someone doesn't like the way they run their companies, they start their own and run it how they want.
              here! Here!
              Comment
              SBR Contests
              Collapse
              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
              Collapse
              Working...