Trump Legal Cases

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 19th Hole
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 03-22-09
    • 18942

    #3116
    TwistedKnickers...
    FromTheRiverToTheSea

    Can't get any lower than this Jew Hater.


    This idiot thnks HAMAS is truthful.
    Comment
    • khicks26
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 09-16-06
      • 45601

      #3117
      Originally posted by 19th Hole
      TwistedKnickers...
      FromTheRiverToTheSea

      Can't get any lower than this Jew Hater.


      This idiot thnks HAMAS is truthful.
      Talk to Dwight and his ghost shows up to insult you. Total Clown World. LOL
      Comment
      • Hareeba!
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 07-01-06
        • 37195

        #3118
        Good to see that somebody here is prepared to call out DipShit for responding to my post calling it a lie, and as per normal, failing to explain precisely what the lie is.

        I suspect he probably does that to almost every post I make. Much like he used to respond to every post with the most childish of gifs.
        That's why I have had him on ignore for years.
        Comment
        • Hareeba!
          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
          • 07-01-06
          • 37195

          #3119
          I’m generally a patient guy but…

          when is SCOTUS going to tell us if it’s ok for a President to order Seal Team Six to assassinate his opponents?
          Comment
          • DwightShrute
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 01-17-09
            • 103113

            #3120
            Originally posted by DipShitHareeballs!
            Good to see that somebody here is prepared to call out DipShit for responding to my post calling it a lie, and as per normal, failing to explain precisely what the lie is.

            I suspect he probably does that to almost every post I make. Much like he used to respond to every post with the most childish of gifs.
            That's why I have had him on ignore for years.

            It is a lie. You lie all the time. I simply post out lies when I see them. You just lie more than anyone else. I have posted dozens of examples of your lies and have provided evidence. So have others. Just like I am doing now.

            Trump isn't charged with espionage. I have already proved it. Whereas, as my worthy counterpart did his best to make his case, but clearly wasn't able to.

            Here's more evidence ...

            “In this case, former President Trump hasn't been charged with spying for a foreign government, or espionage as we normally think about it, but he has been charged with willfully withholding national defense information – which is the way that a case like this is normally charged,” Cordero said.


            Espionage is the crime of spying or secretly watching a person, company, government, etc. for the purpose of gathering secret information or detecting wrongdoing, and to transfer such information to another organization or state. Trump hasn't been accused of any of those things. Duh!






            Last edited by DwightShrute; 06-27-24, 08:27 AM.
            Comment
            • Itsamazing777
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 11-14-12
              • 12602

              #3121
              Originally posted by Hareeba!



              I have lost every debate with him, and I can't stand it
              That's why I have had him on ignore for years.

              Comment
              • jt315
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 11-12-11
                • 21871

                #3122
                Originally posted by Hareeba!
                I’m generally a patient guy but…

                when is SCOTUS going to tell us if it’s ok for a President to order Seal Team Six to assassinate his opponents?
                Stock up on the cheese to go with all that whine when it gets kicked back to the lower courts to hash out what is an official and what is a private act , kissing your chance of another trial reaching a verdict before Election Day goodbye .
                Last edited by jt315; 06-27-24, 10:14 AM.
                Comment
                • Optional
                  Administrator
                  • 06-10-10
                  • 61390

                  #3123
                  Originally posted by DwightShrute
                  “In this case, former President Trump hasn't been charged with spying for a foreign government, or espionage as we normally think about it, but he has been charged with willfully withholding national defense information – which is the way that a case like this is normally charged,” Cordero said.
                  He should keep his "we"s to himself. Just because he only knows morons don't project that onto normal people.

                  What he is trying to say is that he did not realize breaching the Espionage Act means that you have committed espionage.


                  But now you both know that he has definitely and inarguably been charged with espionage, I wonder if either of you will stop the BS.
                  .
                  Comment
                  • Optional
                    Administrator
                    • 06-10-10
                    • 61390

                    #3124
                    Originally posted by DwightShrute
                    Espionage is the crime of spying or secretly watching a person
                    That could be true, or not. (pretty sure that falls under stalking and privacy laws)

                    But unless it is defined as illegal under the Espionage Act, then it isn't the legal definition of espionage.


                    But this DEFINITELY is what espionage is legally;

                    "That section makes it illegal for anyone who has "unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over" national defense information -- such as documents, blueprints, photos, plans and more -- and who "has reason to believe [the information] could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation" then either shares it with unauthorized people or "willfully retains the same and fails" to return it."


                    No spying word involved. That's your made up talking point and irrelevant when we have documented laws with definitions.
                    .
                    Comment
                    • b1slickguy
                      SBR Posting Legend
                      • 11-24-11
                      • 11959

                      #3125
                      Originally posted by DwightShrute
                      It is a lie. You lie all the time. I simply post out lies when I see them. You just lie more than anyone else. I have posted dozens of examples of your lies and have provided evidence. So have others. Just like I am doing now.

                      Trump isn't charged with espionage. I have already proved it. Whereas, as my worthy counterpart did his best to make his case, but clearly wasn't able to.

                      Here's more evidence ...

                      “In this case, former President Trump hasn't been charged with spying for a foreign government, or espionage as we normally think about it, but he has been charged with willfully withholding national defense information – which is the way that a case like this is normally charged,” Cordero said.


                      Espionage is the crime of spying or secretly watching a person, company, government, etc. for the purpose of gathering secret information or detecting wrongdoing, and to transfer such information to another organization or state. Trump hasn't been accused of any of those things. Duh!






                      By their logic, anyone who violates any section/subsection of the Patriot Act would be charged with...wait for it...patriotism?
                      Comment
                      • Hareeba!
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 07-01-06
                        • 37195

                        #3126
                        Originally posted by Optional
                        That could be true, or not. (pretty sure that falls under stalking and privacy laws)

                        But unless it is defined as illegal under the Espionage Act, then it isn't the legal definition of espionage.


                        But this DEFINITELY is what espionage is legally;

                        "That section makes it illegal for anyone who has "unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over" national defense information -- such as documents, blueprints, photos, plans and more -- and who "has reason to believe [the information] could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation" then either shares it with unauthorized people or "willfully retains the same and fails" to return it."


                        No spying word involved. That's your made up talking point and irrelevant when we have documented laws with definitions.
                        DipShit continues to have enormous difficulty comprehending the meaning, usage, and definition of words in context.

                        Espionage
                        Collusion
                        Insurrection
                        Rape


                        Comment
                        • Itsamazing777
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 11-14-12
                          • 12602

                          #3127
                          Comment
                          • Optional
                            Administrator
                            • 06-10-10
                            • 61390

                            #3128
                            Originally posted by b1slickguy

                            By their logic, anyone who violates any section/subsection of the Patriot Act would be charged with...wait for it...patriotism?
                            You guys are funny.

                            Sooo desperate to not call Trump a simple word that you prefer to look like a dunce. lol



                            I guess it keeps people divided and arguing like the puppet masters want. I prefer not to be the puppet personally, but the choice is yours.
                            .
                            Comment
                            • slewfan
                              SBR Posting Legend
                              • 10-01-15
                              • 15902

                              #3129

                              John Fetterman meets with Netanyahu in Israel: ‘I’m so sorry for what has been done to this nation’
                              Comment
                              • DwightShrute
                                SBR Aristocracy
                                • 01-17-09
                                • 103113

                                #3130
                                Originally posted by Optional
                                He should keep his "we"s to himself. Just because he only knows morons don't project that onto normal people.

                                What he is trying to say is that he did not realize breaching the Espionage Act means that you have committed espionage.


                                But now you both know that he has definitely and inarguably been charged with espionage, I wonder if either of you will stop the BS.
                                he has definitelt NOT been charged with teh espionage act.

                                At the center of Donald Trump's historic federal indictment is the Espionage Act, under which prosecutors have charged the former president with illegally keeping government information after leaving the White House and then refusing to give it back.

                                Julian Assange to plead guilty to violating Espionage Act . He didn't plea or been convicted of espionage either.

                                Under the Motor Vehicle Act you could be charged with a whole bunch of things just as the espionage act.


                                So you can't tell me tampering with the ignition is the same as running over someone and killing them while drunk even though you can be charged under the same act. I am not say that's the best example but anyone can understand.

                                A president with the ability to declassify top secret documents and having those documents at his residence isn't anywhere close to the definition of espionage. It just isn't no matter how much you want it to be. Biden couldn't declassify top secret docs but still have hundreds of them in several place including in his garage where his crackhead son lived, and Biden wasn't charged with anything, let along espionage.
                                Last edited by DwightShrute; 06-27-24, 06:09 PM.
                                Comment
                                • DwightShrute
                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                  • 01-17-09
                                  • 103113

                                  #3131

                                  Fetterman hasn't been the disaster like he appeared to be.
                                  Comment
                                  • Optional
                                    Administrator
                                    • 06-10-10
                                    • 61390

                                    #3132
                                    Who cares?

                                    tomatoe, tomartoe.

                                    You say illegally keeping govt info, and I say espionage because that is what he did is defined as under law.

                                    You say he never met her, I say he raped her because the judge said that is what he did under the law.

                                    You say peaceful picnic, I say insurrection because that's what the law makers called it.

                                    See the pattern? You have been groomed into having no respect for the laws anymore...


                                    End result is still the same if he is convicted though, so no matter.
                                    .
                                    Comment
                                    • DwightShrute
                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                      • 01-17-09
                                      • 103113

                                      #3133
                                      Originally posted by Optional
                                      Who cares?

                                      tomatoe, tomartoe.

                                      You say illegally keeping govt info, and I say espionage because that is what he did is defined as under law.

                                      You say he never met her, I say he raped her because the judge said that is what he did under the law.

                                      You say peaceful picnic, I say insurrection because that's what the law makers called it.

                                      See the pattern? You have been groomed into having no respect for the laws anymore...


                                      End result is still the same if he is convicted though, so no matter.
                                      I say he wasn't charged with espionage because he wasn't charged with espionage. I can reality look up the definition of espionage and I can also understand English.
                                      Trump wasn't convicted of rape. No matter what the judge thinks.
                                      It wasn't an insurrection because I have 2 eyes and ears and also the FBI said there was no insurrection.
                                      See the pattern? You have been groomed into having no respect for the laws anymore and believing the lies you are being continuously told by the same people that have been caught lying to you repeatedly for years.

                                      Crooked Hillery, FBI subpoena for email, deletes them, has her staff smash devices with hammers. Biden, classified doc all over the place, sticking out of boxes in an open garage with a crackhead, no charges. Trump dozens of charges having docs in a secure location surrounded by SS.

                                      Comment
                                      • Optional
                                        Administrator
                                        • 06-10-10
                                        • 61390

                                        #3134
                                        You don't need to look up the definition anywhere else but within the laws he is charged under

                                        Here's a link direct to the full definition here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793


                                        Anyway, I am just being the patsy in this stupid politicized game the extremists want us to play by having this extended conversation about it. So carry on as you were
                                        .
                                        Comment
                                        • DwightShrute
                                          SBR Aristocracy
                                          • 01-17-09
                                          • 103113

                                          #3135
                                          Originally posted by Optional
                                          You don't need to look up the definition anywhere else but within the laws he is charged under

                                          Here's a link direct to the full definition here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793


                                          Anyway, I am just being the patsy in this stupid politicized game the extremists want us to play by having this extended conversation about it. So carry on as you were
                                          I am only hoping you at least understand what I am saying, not expecting that you would ever agree with anything I say.
                                          Comment
                                          • jt315
                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                            • 11-12-11
                                            • 21871

                                            #3136
                                            Another shot fired !




                                            WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal judge presiding over the classified documents case of former President Donald Trump granted his request Thursday for a hearing on whether prosecutors had been permitted to improperly breach attorney-client privilege when they obtained crucial evidence from one of his ex-lawyers.


                                            The order from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon ensures further delays in a criminal case that has already been snarled by significant postponements, resulting in the indefinite postponement of a trial that had been set to begin on May 20 in Fort Pierce, Florida. It means that Cannon will revisit a different judge’s order from last year that permitted prosecutors to get testimony and other evidence from a Trump attorney that wound up being repeatedly cited in the indictment of the former president
                                            Comment
                                            • Optional
                                              Administrator
                                              • 06-10-10
                                              • 61390

                                              #3137
                                              Originally posted by DwightShrute

                                              I am only hoping you at least understand what I am saying, not expecting that you would ever agree with anything I say.
                                              Yes I understand. Even get the logic. Espionage sounds bad and you dont think it is fair to lump him in with spies or people like Snowden and Assange.
                                              .
                                              Comment
                                              • JohnGalt2341
                                                SBR Hall of Famer
                                                • 12-31-09
                                                • 9138

                                                #3138
                                                Originally posted by JohnGalt2341
                                                If you like FREE MONEY, bet the OVER on Trump at BetOnline. This should be in the mid 20's at the very lowest.



                                                Also, they let me bet $240 to win $200, so... pretty decent.
                                                Originally posted by BOA12
                                                Best to grab father of lies OV 15.5 early, inferred to rise dramatically B4/BY game time.

                                                GL #13!
                                                BOA12 nailed it on the head here. Who knew this Line would move this much?



                                                Good luck gentlemen!
                                                Comment
                                                • Itsamazing777
                                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                                  • 11-14-12
                                                  • 12602

                                                  #3139
                                                  Biden a disaster already
                                                  Comment
                                                  • DwightShrute
                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                    • 01-17-09
                                                    • 103113

                                                    #3140
                                                    Originally posted by Itsamazing777
                                                    Biden a disaster already

                                                    he's an embarrassment and a liar. worst president ever. The world is laughing.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • JohnGalt2341
                                                      SBR Hall of Famer
                                                      • 12-31-09
                                                      • 9138

                                                      #3141
                                                      EASY Money boys! Anyone else get in on this?



                                                      Originally posted by DwightShrute
                                                      he's an embarrassment and a liar. worst president ever. The world is laughing.
                                                      Comment
                                                      • jt315
                                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                                        • 11-12-11
                                                        • 21871

                                                        #3142
                                                        Originally posted by Hareeba!
                                                        I’m generally a patient guy but…

                                                        when is SCOTUS going to tell us if it’s ok for a President to order Seal Team Six to assassinate his opponents?
                                                        How is this for an appetizer and another kick in the nuts to you and that corrupt POS Jack Smith ?


                                                        Supreme Court overturns conviction on obstruction charge used in hundreds of Jan. 6 cases


                                                        By a 6-3 vote, the court said obstruction of an official proceeding requires defendants to impair the availability or integrity of records, documents or objects.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • Itsamazing777
                                                          SBR Posting Legend
                                                          • 11-14-12
                                                          • 12602

                                                          #3143
                                                          Originally posted by JohnGalt2341
                                                          EASY Money boys! Anyone else get in on this?






                                                          Where's that Trump over lies ticket?
                                                          Comment
                                                          • JohnGalt2341
                                                            SBR Hall of Famer
                                                            • 12-31-09
                                                            • 9138

                                                            #3144
                                                            Originally posted by Itsamazing777
                                                            Where's that Trump over lies ticket?
                                                            Here's the FULL ticket for you.

                                                            Comment
                                                            • Itsamazing777
                                                              SBR Posting Legend
                                                              • 11-14-12
                                                              • 12602

                                                              #3145
                                                              The problem with those "checkers" is that if a candidate says they reduced something 35 percent but it was actually 34 percent, they consider that a "lie"

                                                              not in my book. The American people are smarter than that as a whole, and rightfully said Trump dominated Biden.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • jt315
                                                                SBR Posting Legend
                                                                • 11-12-11
                                                                • 21871

                                                                #3146
                                                                Originally posted by Hareeba!
                                                                I’m generally a patient guy but…

                                                                when is SCOTUS going to tell us if it’s ok for a President to order Seal Team Six to assassinate his opponents?

                                                                Stick your Seal Team Six hypothetical up your *ss


                                                                Judge Flo Pan, just reversed by SCOTUS, wrote both appellate court opinions upholding 1512c2.

                                                                She also is the dunce who raised the "Seal Team Six" hypothetical in presidential immunity oral arguments.

                                                                Her opinion denying Trump's claims of immunity also will be scrutinized in SCOTUS immunity order, which will post Monday.

                                                                Last edited by jt315; 06-28-24, 01:35 PM.
                                                                Comment
                                                                • JohnGalt2341
                                                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                                                  • 12-31-09
                                                                  • 9138

                                                                  #3147
                                                                  Originally posted by Itsamazing777
                                                                  The problem with those "checkers" is that if a candidate says they reduced something 35 percent but it was actually 34 percent, they consider that a "lie"

                                                                  not in my book. The American people are smarter than that as a whole, and rightfully said Trump dominated Biden.
                                                                  You can believe whatever you want. Before the next debate, I will come into this thread again and post another Winner. And even after your rationalzation, you STILL won't bet the Over. I'm trying to make you some money here. I've posted SEVERAL winning plays in this thread. Regardless of how you think they've won, that fact is, they have still Won. If you were "smart" you would have figured that out a LONG time ago.
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • DwightShrute
                                                                    SBR Aristocracy
                                                                    • 01-17-09
                                                                    • 103113

                                                                    #3148
                                                                    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who did this <a href="https://t.co/zP55AIUY5i">pic.twitter.com/zP55AIUY5i</a></p>&mdash; �������� �������� ♛ ✡︎ (@NiohBerg) <a href="https://twitter.com/NiohBerg/status/1806658273623322832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >June 28, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • getaloadoffatso
                                                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                                                      • 03-14-23
                                                                      • 608

                                                                      #3149
                                                                      Originally posted by DwightShrute
                                                                      <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who did this <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/zP55AIUY5i">pic.twitter.com/zP55AIUY5i</a></p>&mdash; �������� �������� ♛ ✡︎ (@NiohBerg) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/NiohBerg/status/1806658273623322832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >June 28, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
                                                                      LOL
                                                                      She makes way more sense than Biden
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      • jt315
                                                                        SBR Posting Legend
                                                                        • 11-12-11
                                                                        • 21871

                                                                        #3150

                                                                        BOOM !


                                                                        What’s that sound you hear ?

                                                                        The sound of corrupt Jack the Jerkoff Smith’s chances of a trial reaching a verdict before Election Day coming to a screeching halt .




                                                                        Trump Immunity --

                                                                        Absolute immunity for core POTUS powers.
                                                                        PRESUMPTIVE IMMUNITY for "official acts."
                                                                        No Immunity for private acts.
                                                                        Comment
                                                                        SBR Contests
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                        Collapse
                                                                        Working...