<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Apparently it’s “Free speech for me. Not for thee.”</p>— Dan Rather (@DanRather) <a href="https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1603610842255065090?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Comment -
Did they say they banned a former POTUS for spite? Do they have to give a reason to ban someone? Asking for a friend they were curiousOriginally posted by DwightShrute
I wish musk would ban all that are NOT GOP, Republican, right wing or what ever other name they go by. I think he has the right and should do it! If you actually read the 1st amendment, any reasonable person could see that would not violate itComment -
This is criminal
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tucker Carlson and Charlie Hurt discuss the FBI's collaboration with Twitter:<br><br>"It's a clear violation of the First Amendment." <a href="https://t.co/zbBKFcV2rP">pic.twitter.com/zbBKFcV2rP</a></p>— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) <a href="https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1603924306077306880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 17, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
Duhwit swaps countries so much he doesn't have any rights, let alone a first amendment one. He needs to STFU and stay in his lane.
Comment -
Comment -
Twitter’s top ranks were riddled with ex-FBI agents and executives, stitching the company even closer to the federal agency now under fire for leaning on Twitter to meddle in the 2020 elections.
More than a dozen former feds flocked to the company in the months and years prior to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social network in October.
The Post found FBI influence was considerably more significant than just James Baker, the FBI’s former general counsel who later worked in the same role for Twitter. He was recently fired by Musk for interfering in the billionaire’s efforts to come clean about past transgressions at the company.
In some cases, the former G-men and -women held positions that would have put them close to company leadership directly involved in censoring The Post’s Hunter Biden coverage in October 2020.[/COLOR]Comment -
Can you quote one of those 150 emails that shows Criminality Dwight?Originally posted by DwightShrute
Tucker wasn't able to!!!
You guys think everyone is so dumb they will just eat up your lies! (or maybe Tucker only wants dumb people to bolster his lynch mob).Comment -
Good catch Opti, didn't quote or show one. That's odd you would think that would be the first thing they would do! They wanted you to believe it on on their word, now that should be a crime!Originally posted by OptionalComment -
Amazing. All the people who called for Trumps impeachment without any proof against him are now calling for proof if there were e mails.
Biden gets to make the final decision which e mails can be released. Guess What.?.
Comment -
Really Biden gets to make that decision? I would have thought a judge would.Originally posted by slewfanAmazing. All the people who called for Trumps impeachment without any proof against him are now calling for proof if there were e mails.
Biden gets to make the final decision which e mails can be released. Guess What.?.
But if its the POTUS decision now, it should be no matter who is POTUS isComment -
Read it and weep Jack. Read it and weep... For someone who does not like Biden, you sure front for him plenty. Or is it that you just like to play devils advocate and say nothing but bull...?
The Biden administration faces a difficult decision early next year — whether to block the National Archives from releasing hundreds of Obama-era documents related to first son Hunter Biden and his relationship with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma while Joe Biden was vice president.
The White House has been mum about whether it will invoke executive privilege to stop papers from becoming public Feb. 28, 2023, Insider reports.
The records include 69 images and 260 email messages that mention Burisma and date back to 2014, when Hunter, now 52, had a lucrative seat on the company’s board — a shady relationship The Post exposed in a series of reports in October 2020.
The National Archives informed the Biden White House and the Obama Foundation in a Nov. 30 letter that it planned to release the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act request for vice presidential records created between May and December of 2014 that contain the word “Burisma,” Insider said.
The letter said “several” of the emails involved media inquiries after it was revealed in 2014 that Hunter Biden would accept a seat on Burisma’s board, where he was paid as much as $83,333 a month even though he had no experience in energy issues.Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How fitting they are together <a href="https://t.co/FapzmnNXFI">https://t.co/FapzmnNXFI</a></p>— Ruth Ben-Ghiat (@ruthbenghiat) <a href="https://twitter.com/ruthbenghiat/status/1604529374505615364?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 18, 2022</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
No not really. He isn't the leader and CEO of the dunning kruger fan club for nothingOriginally posted by OptionalComment -
Where TF are their head picnic napkins?Originally posted by Thor4140
Comment -
Originally posted by jackpot269
Read it and weep Jack. Read it and weep... For someone who does not like Biden, you sure front for him plenty. Or is it that you just like to play devils advocate and say nothing but bull...?
The Biden administration faces a difficult decision early next year — whether to block the National Archives from releasing hundreds of Obama-era documents related to first son Hunter Biden and his relationship with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma while Joe Biden was vice president.
The White House has been mum about whether it will invoke executive privilege to stop papers from becoming public Feb. 28, 2023, Insider reports.
The records include 69 images and 260 email messages that mention Burisma and date back to 2014, when Hunter, now 52, had a lucrative seat on the company’s board — a shady relationship The Post exposed in a series of reports in October 2020.
The National Archives informed the Biden White House and the Obama Foundation in a Nov. 30 letter that it planned to release the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act request for vice presidential records created between May and December of 2014 that contain the word “Burisma,” Insider said.
The letter said “several” of the emails involved media inquiries after it was revealed in 2014 that Hunter Biden would accept a seat on Burisma’s board, where he was paid as much as $83,333 a month even though he had no experience in energy issues.Comment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">46. The FBI’s influence campaign may have been helped by the fact that it was paying Twitter millions of dollars for its staff time.<br><br>“I am happy to report we have collected $3,415,323 since October 2019!” reports an associate of Jim Baker in early 2021. <a href="https://t.co/SmNse97QxK">pic.twitter.com/SmNse97QxK</a></p>— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1604908670063906817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
Lol
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The lead for “Yes” will increase even further when they finally report from Gwinnett and Fulton counties. <a href="https://t.co/abdieKYpGQ">pic.twitter.com/abdieKYpGQ</a></p>— Brian Tyler Cohen (@briantylercohen) <a href="https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1604629818007375872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
Originally posted by rkelly110Where TF are their head picnic napkins?
Comment -
Now wonder they want all the antisemites back on twitter.Originally posted by Thor4140Comment -
These guys are the ones that invested money in twitter, Elon's backers.Originally posted by Thor4140
The people that cut people into pieces for using free speech. Right dupes fooled again.
Is he still your hero Dwight like this clown that sucks Saudi.
Comment -
Comment -
Were Rebel News able to link to any specific message from the Twitter files to backup that claim Dwight?
Just one example would be good to see..Comment -
All they have is dick pic's, crack smoking, and hookers. The censorship is the story, just make up your own shit.Originally posted by OptionalComment -
It does sound like any requests about hunter biden were just asking for nude images to be removed.Originally posted by khicks26
But that source may be as unreliable as Dwight's sources saying there is proof of collusion too.
Only way to know for sure is to see one of these incriminating messages ourselves i think..Comment -
My friend, there are no free speech when it comes to a corporate agenda.Originally posted by DwightShruteComment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mainstream Media treating <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@elonmusk</a>'s Twitter Files like: <br><br>(meme by <a href="https://twitter.com/NautPoso?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nautposo</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/drefanzor?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@drefanzo r</a>) <a href="https://t.co/hx6SixtWQT">pic.twitter.com/hx6SixtWQT</a></p>— NautPoso ����☘️ (@NautPoso) <a href="https://twitter.com/NautPoso/status/1605650145151832064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 21, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
LOL, Its a good thing Hunter didn't run for president.Originally posted by OptionalComment -
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The latest & most disgraceful <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TwitterFiles?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc% 5Etfw">#TwitterFiles</a> yet show government and Twitter colluding to suppress information about Covid-19 and punish those who shared it, not because that information was incorrect, but because it went against the prevailing narrative.<a href="https://t.co/64WUWwS3CV">https://t.co/64WUWwS3CV</a></p>— Scott Morefield (@SKMorefield) <a href="https://twitter.com/SKMorefield/status/1607394796297125888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 26, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
Comment -
F russia and these towel heads. Egypt is a new player in NG and oil.Originally posted by Thor4140
Comment -
LOL, didn't click, dick.Originally posted by b1slickguyComment -
Why would I weep? I'm for fairness, whatever one POTUS has the power to do the next one and ones before should have same power!Originally posted by slewfan
You must have not read my post correctly I would not think Biden would or should have the power to make that decision if Mr Trump were still POTUS I would feel the same way.
I'm not like the GOP and think whatever is good for me at the time!
Surprised you would not agree Biden should not have that power I would have thought that was something we could agree on!!
I was wrong again, so give Biden the power to decide I don't care one way or the other please reply I'm curious why you would be happy with that!Comment -
Post the files so we all can see them! If they are not available for review they don't exist!Originally posted by DwightShrute
And I don't care one way or the other, can't be worse than Desantis taking down the Florida state web site at the peak of covid!Comment -
These peanuts repeat each others lies without even engaging the brain to wonder why there is not one file from the Twitter Files actually quoted in any article to back up the claimsOriginally posted by jackpot269
Dwight almost lost his mind searching for one over the last week..Comment -
Comment
