Originally posted by d2bets
-
Throwing Sessions under the bus. IE: getting him back after his bashing of Trump.Comment -
LMAO! RKelly's daughter finally decided to show her face on camera!
Comment -
Thought you didn't like men hitting women? But it's ok now so long as you were entertained, eh flip flopper?Originally posted by Russian RocketLMAO! RKelly's daughter finally decided to show her face on camera!
Comment -
Pretty sure it refers to Rosenstein, not Sessions.Originally posted by rkelly110Comment -
That's not a fkng WOMAN you brain dead imbecile! Libs like you are destroying your society to the point where you can't even tell the difference!Originally posted by rkelly110
Comment -
Originally posted by Russian RocketLMAO! RKelly's daughter finally decided to show her face on camera!
Would be on 24/7 loop had the Trump supporter been white. Guess it's okay for liberals to assault black guys now? Bill Maher will be proud.Comment -
Bingo!Originally posted by TheSideBet
Comment -
Except that Rosenstein is not investigating Trump. He appointed Mueller with a broad directive and Mueller decides what/who to investigate.Originally posted by rkelly110
And, Trump is not being investigated *for* firing Coney. He's being investigating for his interactions with Comey, and others, that preceded his firing.Comment -
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say they didn't reveal much to fit the story and plot line being written by Anerican media so they must be solid. Haven't heard a single MSM source do a "bombshell" soubdbite from it. In other words, it's an honest fact based piece.Originally posted by Russian RocketComment -
Trump should keep tweeting every day about the investigation. It will help him a lot.
Says zero defense attorneys.
Trump is either criminally stupid or he wants to be impeached or charged.Comment -
...or Trump is just being Trump and it pisses you off, cause you can't do jack shit about it!Originally posted by d2bets
Comment -
you are the last person who should be talking about the lawOriginally posted by d2betsComment -
Considering I have my JD and have practiced for 17 years, I doubt I am the last.Originally posted by DwightShruteComment -
It doesn't piss me off. I hope he keeps it up. Digging his own grave. He knows he's going down and wants to go down a martyr to his idiot followers.Originally posted by Russian Rocket...or Trump is just being Trump and it pisses you off, cause you can't do jack shit about it!Comment -
d2bets you can fool rkelly with this statement, but you certainly ain't going to fool me here.Originally posted by d2betsComment -
Gingrich says that POTUS can't obstruct justice.
Bill Clinton is like "oh really, tell me more."Comment -
It does piss you off. No one believes otherwise.Originally posted by d2bets
You rather see the country fail than see Trump succeed.
character assassination is always easier than making a sensible argumentComment -
Originally posted by d2bets
so surprised Dwight didn't know that, I spend time here sporadically and knew it. Dwight spends every waking second here and didn't know it? how could that be? just more proof these guys don't really read and comprehend anything. gosh I am so surprised.Comment -
Originally posted by DwightShrute
says the lad that for 8 years vilified president Obama. oh my!Comment -
you told me that before. It was a joke. hahahaOriginally posted by d2betsComment -
If Trump succeeds, the country fails. These two things are inversely proportionate.Originally posted by DwightShruteComment -
explain what successes would result in the country failingOriginally posted by d2betsComment -
Yeah exactly...I'm pretty sure you're going to like it. It's more of an educational piece about Russia, Vlad, Russians and the new Russian view (not the old Soviet) on America of course. Some of the things you already know, but some will be new to you.Originally posted by itchypickleComment -
Originally posted by d2bets
How about he knows he has done nothing wrong?! I know if someone on a hunt accused me of some random unprovable charge that I know I didn't do I sure as hell would be doing the same thing.
Admit it d2, if he goes silent you'll accuse him of knowing the walls are closing in and he's admitting guilt, if he keeps talking you'll say he's burying himself. If Mueller comes out and refers zero charges you'll say Trump paid him off. If they find emails of Podesta and Mook admitting they succeeded with their narrative and can't believe the media helped them push it and they planted fake news you'll say it's a phony mock up.
Your candidate lost, get over it. The man won, he deserves his time in office. Go find a hobby to pass the time and try again in a few years, you'll survive. Great advice from comedian Jim Jeffries I saw this week.Comment -
Lying brooksOriginally posted by brooks85Comment -
Originally posted by rkelly110
Comment -
And here we go sheeple...finally someone is sending you a little warning
In Stunning Announcement, DOJ Warns Not To Trust Stories Based On "Anonymous Sources"
In a move that stunned many members of the media, on Thursday night Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is overseeing the Russia probe due to Jeff Sessions' recusal and who earlier this week confirmed only he has authority to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, released an unorthodox statement to be “skeptical about anonymous allegations” following the relentless barrage of news reports emerging from the WaPo and the NYT about the evolving probe into Russia’s "election interference" and possible collusion with Trump, all based on "anonymous sources."
Rosenstein, who many had seen as a Trump foil at the DOJ, did not cite specific reports. The DOJ released Rosenstein’s statement after 9 p.m., shortly after The Washington Post reported that the special counsel was investigating the business dealings of Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law and adviser. That report was attributed to unnamed American officials.
"Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous 'officials,' particularly when they do not identify the country — let alone the branch or agency of government — with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated. Americans should be skeptical about anonymous allegations. The Department of Justice has a long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations.
As we said, the media and punditry was "stunned" by the official statement: the NYT' Maggie Haberman said "Have literally never seen a statement like this." The new leader of the Trump "resistance", Preet Bharara also chimed in, tweeting "Americans should also exercise caution before accepting as true lies about firing of FBI Director & defamation of a war hero special counsel"
To be expected, Rosenstein - who the media was ambivalent about and following his recent testimony in which he said there was "no grounds" to fire Mueller, praised - promptly became the latest pariah for insinuating that the media's Trump reportage may be, in fact, fake news.
As the NYT reported this morning, the "statement aligned with the president’s open frustration with unflattering leaks. Mr. Trump has called stories about the investigation “fake news” and complained on Twitter about a Washington Post report on Wednesday night that the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, was investigating the president himself for possible obstruction of justice. That story was also attributed to unnamed sources, as was a New York Times article that same evening about Mr. Mueller’s request for interviews with three top intelligence officials."
What to make of Rosenstein's statement?
On one hand, it could be seen as a validation of Trump's repeated allegations that much of what has emerged in press in recent weeks is "fake news." On the other, as some in the media suggested, it could be an attempt to "chill" communications and leaks to the press. Yet others saw this as a preview of what may be another upcoming story. As Bloomberg's Jennifer Epstein who said "If this statement is preemptive: oh, boy, is the story going to be explosive."
Comment -
this what smart people understand. Like the 19 million Latinos who voted for Trump etcOriginally posted by Russian RocketAnd here we go sheeple...finally someone is sending you a little warning
In Stunning Announcement, DOJ Warns Not To Trust Stories Based On "Anonymous Sources"
In a move that stunned many members of the media, on Thursday night Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is overseeing the Russia probe due to Jeff Sessions' recusal and who earlier this week confirmed only he has authority to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, released an unorthodox statement to be “skeptical about anonymous allegations” following the relentless barrage of news reports emerging from the WaPo and the NYT about the evolving probe into Russia’s "election interference" and possible collusion with Trump, all based on "anonymous sources."
Rosenstein, who many had seen as a Trump foil at the DOJ, did not cite specific reports. The DOJ released Rosenstein’s statement after 9 p.m., shortly after The Washington Post reported that the special counsel was investigating the business dealings of Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law and adviser. That report was attributed to unnamed American officials.
"Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous 'officials,' particularly when they do not identify the country — let alone the branch or agency of government — with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated. Americans should be skeptical about anonymous allegations. The Department of Justice has a long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations.
As we said, the media and punditry was "stunned" by the official statement: the NYT' Maggie Haberman said "Have literally never seen a statement like this." The new leader of the Trump "resistance", Preet Bharara also chimed in, tweeting "Americans should also exercise caution before accepting as true lies about firing of FBI Director & defamation of a war hero special counsel"
To be expected, Rosenstein - who the media was ambivalent about and following his recent testimony in which he said there was "no grounds" to fire Mueller, praised - promptly became the latest pariah for insinuating that the media's Trump reportage may be, in fact, fake news.
As the NYT reported this morning, the "statement aligned with the president’s open frustration with unflattering leaks. Mr. Trump has called stories about the investigation “fake news” and complained on Twitter about a Washington Post report on Wednesday night that the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, was investigating the president himself for possible obstruction of justice. That story was also attributed to unnamed sources, as was a New York Times article that same evening about Mr. Mueller’s request for interviews with three top intelligence officials."
What to make of Rosenstein's statement?
On one hand, it could be seen as a validation of Trump's repeated allegations that much of what has emerged in press in recent weeks is "fake news." On the other, as some in the media suggested, it could be an attempt to "chill" communications and leaks to the press. Yet others saw this as a preview of what may be another upcoming story. As Bloomberg's Jennifer Epstein who said "If this statement is preemptive: oh, boy, is the story going to be explosive."
The regressive left thinks that style and no message is all that it takes to win people over. They were wrong again as usual.Comment -
Winning comes AFTER you play the game, not before.Originally posted by DwightShrute
But libtarded snowflakes were too dumb to understand that.Comment -
relevant lyrics for this thread, 'murica
Comment -
Originally posted by Russian Rocket
said it before and I will say it again and again ...
Comment -
Repealing Obama care, tax cuts for rich, etc etc.Originally posted by DwightShruteComment -
huh?Originally posted by d2bets
so you mean replacing a failed heath care plan that insurers are pulling out of and premiums are going through the roof and cutting taxes for everyone is somehow a bad thing? You must be joking I would say to most people. You, I am convinced are serious though.
unreal how youthinksay the dumbest things
You have much hate in your heart. You hate your country I am 100% certain. You would rather see Trump fail than have the country succeed and so that you could be right just one time.Comment -
they are pulling out because trump is refusing to pay the govt portion. But since you live on socialized meds than how would you know?Originally posted by DwightShruteComment -
both sentences are lies.Originally posted by chico2663
They stared pulling out before Trump was president.
I don't take any meds.
Facts can be your friend. Get to know some.Comment
