Boys Whose buying what the Manure Man is selling?

onacloud · 09-11-12, 05:56 PM

Brandon Marshall is the real deal

k13 · 09-11-12, 06:02 PM

But the score could be like 35-17 Packers and go over.

borednaz · 09-11-12, 06:08 PM

k13 that is a fair assessment. But I think the Pack still has issues to work out & the Bears win by their D. So I'd see it more like a 24-17 type of game. Maybe with a little luck for Rodgers a 27-17. With a Rivalry like this I expect them to play it tight & close.

ngates815 · 09-11-12, 06:19 PM

How many did SF score on the packers? Add an extra FG and TD to that...Then take that number and add 10. Then take those 2 numbers and add them, that's the score of the game.

All I'm sayin is the Bears SHOULD score more than that SF offense did. Packers will get theirs, but that Bears D aint no slouch either and they know the Pack will be passing. Bears shoulda had 18 INT's last game. They should get about the same amount of chances on Rodgers.

P.S. Fukk the Bears go Lions.

borednaz · 09-11-12, 06:21 PM

Ngates Pal, I think you need a new TV pal. In what Reality do you think the Bears are that much better than SF?

ngates815 · 09-11-12, 06:27 PM

BorednAZ...not gonna argue this. You need glasses and I need a new TV.

From what I had deciphered in my previous post. I said the packers were 10 points better than the Bears. The Bears SHOULD score 10 pts more than SF did ( yes I think Bears offense is better than SF's).

WvGambler · 09-11-12, 06:33 PM

Borednaz you are saying that one game against a bad team can't make Cutler....then say "have you seen the pack this year?" I'm not gonna explain this idiocy.

meader99 · 09-11-12, 06:53 PM

Originally posted by ngates815

How many did SF score on the packers? Add an extra FG and TD to that...Then take that number and add 10. Then take those 2 numbers and add them, that's the score of the game.

All I'm sayin is the Bears SHOULD score more than that SF offense did. Packers will get theirs, but that Bears D aint no slouch either and they know the Pack will be passing. Bears shoulda had 18 INT's last game. They should get about the same amount of chances on Rodgers.

P.S. Fukk the Bears go Lions.

So the guy that threw 6 picks all last year is going to give the Bears a bunch of int chances? This ain't Brett Favre slinging it in Green Bay anymore.

borednaz · 09-11-12, 07:00 PM

Originally posted by WvGambler

Borednaz you are saying that one game against a bad team can't make Cutler....then say "have you seen the pack this year?" I'm not gonna explain this idiocy.

Wv, I don't think you could because your reading it wrong or just incapable of thought if you don't get it. Cutler is a horrible QB, we have years of evidence to go off. His defense like it always does won this game. So to expect Cutler to suddenly score 40 a game is idiocy. We won't see a Rookie QB making mistakes under pressure. So I see the bears @ 17-20 pts

Following that train of thought (You know the topic of a over), The points then fall on Green Bay to cover; which brought on "Have you seen the pack this year?". Green Bay is not going to score more than 21 pts if that. But they would have to cover 30 to make this work.

borednaz · 09-11-12, 07:02 PM

Originally posted by ngates815

BorednAZ...not gonna argue this. You need glasses and I need a new TV.

From what I had deciphered in my previous post. I said the packers were 10 points better than the Bears. The Bears SHOULD score 10 pts more than SF did ( yes I think Bears offense is better than SF's).

NGates Pal, I'am getting older I might need glasses. If you were telling me the Bears would score 10 exactly, That I could agree with it. 10 more than what SF did I just can't see it.

Brock Landers · 09-11-12, 07:02 PM

Bears +7 1/2 -120 is my lock

LOCK IT UP

Chi_archie · 09-11-12, 07:11 PM

the last time these two teams met they combined for 56 points

and McCown was the QB of THAT high powered bears offense

calmeat · 09-11-12, 07:15 PM

I have this game going over 60 in my projections. CHI is not CHI of old they actually have a passing attack and a formidable run game and Green Bay D is terrible. On the other hand do you think that GB will not respond after the loss last week? They will get their points as well. Seems to me like a good part of a teaser (CHI/GB Over 45)

face · 09-11-12, 07:19 PM

league has changed, lots of PI calls now extending drives

ngates815 · 09-11-12, 07:19 PM

Originally posted by borednaz

NGates Pal, I'am getting older I might need glasses. If you were telling me the Bears would score 10 exactly, That I could agree with it. 10 more than what SF did I just can't see it.

I just kidding.

But I do think that the Bears offense is better than SF's, so they SHOULD score the same if not more than SF. That's all just my opinions of course. And I don't think the Packers offense sputters like it did last week. On that same thought, who fukkin knows.

Chi_archie · 09-11-12, 07:21 PM

gates were you at a bar in logan square on sunday afternoon for the bears game?

meader99 · 09-11-12, 07:22 PM

Originally posted by borednaz

Wv, I don't think you could because your reading it wrong or just incapable of thought if you don't get it. Cutler is a horrible QB, we have years of evidence to go off. His defense like it always does won this game. So to expect Cutler to suddenly score 40 a game is idiocy. We won't see a Rookie QB making mistakes under pressure. So I see the bears @ 17-20 pts

Following that train of thought (You know the topic of a over), The points then fall on Green Bay to cover; which brought on "Have you seen the pack this year?". Green Bay is not going to score more than 21 pts if that. But they would have to cover 30 to make this work.

San Fran probably has the best defense in the league. The Pack scored 22, but they won't score more than 21 on the Bears?

Chi_archie · 09-11-12, 07:29 PM

is jennings playing for GB?

keep in mind this is a short week for both teams, IMO that favors the offense more than the D

but we'll see

k13 · 09-11-12, 07:34 PM

Originally posted by borednaz

k13 that is a fair assessment. But I think the Pack still has issues to work out & the Bears win by their D. So I'd see it more like a 24-17 type of game. Maybe with a little luck for Rodgers a 27-17. With a Rivalry like this I expect them to play it tight & close.

How about 28-24? Sounds kind of realistic.

I'm not into totals that much but think Packers win.

borednaz · 09-11-12, 07:50 PM

Originally posted by k13

How about 28-24? Sounds kind of realistic.

I'm not into totals that much but think Packers win.

Not really. 28-21 would be pressing it. Some people brought good points other than opinions so thank you to all of you. PI's with horrible scab ref's does lead to the possibility of extended drives. However it also leads to horrible calls which push back offenses. It seems like False start is the only call half these refs know. Also we've seen these ref's rob teams of a lot of points, why would that change?

tshafer117 · 09-11-12, 08:54 PM

I'm taking the under in this game....I think the Chicago offense is worse than San Fran, and I think this will be a grinding type game. Call me crazy but I see G.B. winning 20-13 or something to that effect.