Introducing TOTALCON - My MLB Total Calculator

[MonkeyF0cker]

lol precisly, Im tired of these ***** who claim themselves great without ever trying anything new/nothing to show for themselves. been seing a lot of diff people around these forums and smug peices of shit who think they know the proper way to the money hole, yet have never proved or had a thread with winning picks, gets old. mathdotcoms garbage gets old. dont know if its just coincidencce of the posts Ive seen from him but asshole just pretends to be a big money dog without any legitimate backing, they name drop well , know some of the lingo but at the end of the day they are freaking clueless, creating efficient and legitimate systems like these is not an exact science and incredibly hard to maintain + $ over a sustainable amount of time, hats off to those who try

What does a "big money dog" with "legitimate backing" sound like?

Just curious.

[Smutbucket]

moneyfocker your argument is rediculous if you look at the type of "insults" hes recieving...no ones feeling getting hurt, more so were just getting annoyed with your trollers, if mathy added some sort of "substance" to his disagreements to this system maybe we'd all be getting somewhere.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Is it "rediculous" or ridiculous? Why is that word so hard for people to spell?

I believe he is trying to help. What else would you like him to do?

Personally, I don't care if you guys follow this model. It's your money. You're all a bunch of coinflippers regardless. Same result in the end.

[Extra Innings]

LMAO.

Now that's fukkin classic.

Look at these goofballs trashing you and mathy. How many of these type threads have you guys seen over the years

[frogsrangers]

Again I don't really care about the insults, I can understand the skepticism. Models/systems are like used car salesman, a lot of them are con men trying to push a scheme.

But I am no tout, I would never in a million years charge for picks. Call me the anti-tout. I hate touts

At least I am not trying to push this for money!

[mathdotcom]

idiots like mathdotcom are same idiots who were talking shit about einstein when he first came up with the lightbulb

I should make this my signature

[mathdotcom]

frogs model is a classic example of KITCHEN SINK statistics

[Smutbucket]

lol, called a mistake, (and was heavily influenced by drugs (LSD/alchohol+weed=sat.night) if you had any understanding of what I was actually saying and not so focused on a "lapse of memory" maybe you would contribute something beneficial to a thread. Ive never seen you contribute anything positive to any thread, so now you know why I think your a bitch. plus look at your pic. enough said.

[flipside2469]

Hilarious.

lol, called a mistake, (and was heavily influenced by drugs (LSD/alchohol+weed=sat.night) if you had any understanding of what I was actually saying and not so focused on a "lapse of memory" maybe you would contribute something beneficial to a thread. Ive never seen you contribute anything positive to any thread, so now you know why I think your a bitch. plus look at your pic. enough said.

[ThaBigG]

Today's Numbers, not a very friendly under card today:

-5.899 MIA/PIT
-4.269 BAL/CLE
-3.327 NYY/OAK
-2.911 CHW/DET
-2.860 MIL/CIN (8.5 total)
-1.933 CHC/STL
-1.860 MIL/CIN (8 total)
-1.614 TEX/LAA
-1.310 TOR/BOS
-0.869 HOU/ARI
-0.054 LAD/NYM
0.369 MIN/KC
1.078 COL/SD
1.115 SF/PHI
2.084 SEA/TB
3.123 ATL/WAS (Game 1)
5.983 ATL/WAS (Game 2)

Plays:

MIA/PIT U 8.5
BAL/CLE U 9

Thanks bro for the picks!

[MonkeyF0cker]

frogs model is a classic example of KITCHEN SINK statistics

Umm. I believe it's actually closer to the invention of the light bulb...

[b1slickguy]

Looks like the kitchen sink is full of W's. Keep it up, Frogs! BOL

[a4u2fear]

Again I don't really care about the insults, I can understand the skepticism. Models/systems are like used car salesman, a lot of them are con men trying to push a scheme.

But I am no tout, I would never in a million years charge for picks. Call me the anti-tout. I hate touts

At least I am not trying to push this for money!

No one listens to mathdotcom anyway.

[RyanLeafOfBets]

GL Frog. Hope this model keeps picking winners.

[MonkeyF0cker]

lol, called a mistake, (and was heavily influenced by drugs (LSD/alchohol+weed=sat.night) if you had any understanding of what I was actually saying and not so focused on a "lapse of memory" maybe you would contribute something beneficial to a thread. Ive never seen you contribute anything positive to any thread, so now you know why I think your a bitch. plus look at your pic. enough said.

You mean like, "Yay! You're doing so awesome!" Is that a "positive" contribution?

Probably not a good idea to let him know that his "model" has serious quant flaws.

[jjgold]

Frogger keep up the good work

I am curious to see how this develops

If you have haters it means your winning

[SlickRick1382]

mIRC scripting ... damn that takes me back....

Hasn't been on mIRC since back in the day when I played Pimpwar in '99-'00 and later Torn.

[davidchong]

Today's Numbers:

5.840 BAL/MIN
3.443 PIT/COL
2.994 SEA/KC
2.490 NYM/WAS
2.130 LAA/DET (8.5 total)
1.630 LAA/DET (9 total)
-0.102 SF/ATL
-0.109 MIA/CHC
-1.596 TOR/NYY
-1.935 STL/MIL (8.5 total)
-2.016 ARI/CIN
-2.096 TOR/NYY
-2.435 STL/MIL (9 total)
-2.635 CHW/BOS
-3.307 LAD/PHI
-3.350 CLE/TB
-6.538 TEX/OAK
-6.871 HOU/SD

I changed the way the factor is shown. Instead of a number from 0 going up, I decided to make 0 the baseline, meaning a factor of 0 is a 50/50 coin flip of going over or under. Any number ABOVE 0 means the total is more likely to go over, and any number BELOW 0 means the total is more likely to go under. I also added weighting (some stats are worth more than others) and deviation to the calculation method. (deviation i.e. a team batting .500 against lefties will increase the factor more than a team batting .400 against lefties, but both will increase the factor)

Today's Plays:

BAL/MIN Over 9
TEX/OAK Under 7.5
STL/MIL Under 9

Not playing HOU/SD Under, because the umpire in that game has gone over 17 out of his 18 games. Even with that in mind, my calculator still liked that under there, but I am not going to go against that trend.

Higher numbers is under and lower are over..... why changed?

[ghislaine]

Looking real good man !
Keep it up

[frogsrangers]

All I have to say about today's number is HOLY MACKEREL... not a lot of friendly unders today. In fact I don't even feel comfortable playing PIT/CHC under.

-5.2020 CHC/PIT (8 total)
-4.2020 CHC/PIT (7.5 total)
-1.1453 MIL/PHI
-0.9600 BAL/CLE
0.7983 CIN/HOU
0.8653 BOS/TEX (10.5 total)
0.9340 WAS/NYM
0.9376 MIN/CHW
1.1293 ATL/MIA
1.8653 BOS/TEX (10 total)
2.0417 LAD/STL
3.1330 NYY/SEA
5.1103 SF/SD
6.6900 COL/ARI (9.5 total)
7.2816 KC/LAA
7.6900 COL/ARI (9 total)

Today's plays:

CHC/PIT U 8
COL/ARI O 9
KC/LAA O 7.5
LAD/STL O 9

[Smutbucket]

Higher numbers is under and lower are over..... why changed?

only thing he changed was order he arranged the numbers. before he arranged highest to lowest. now hes starting with lowest at top,

[frogsrangers]

only thing he changed was order he arranged the numbers. before he arranged highest to lowest. now hes starting with lowest at top,

It is less confusing

Under = Lower number
Over = Higher number

The way it should be.

[fataliz]

hmmm why did u choose STL/LAD when the value is @ 2, lower than a few other games which you did not choose?

[frogsrangers]

Another under winner

I'm on a fukin roll

[frogsrangers]

hmmm why did u choose STL/LAD when the value is @ 2, lower than a few other games which you did not choose?

Discretionary pick

I liked the weathrr and pitchers

[nrok2118]

Another under winner

I'm on a fukin roll

Cant beleive not only will this hit, but easily! Wish I tailed...

[frogsrangers]

But, my ability to pick overs with this continues to suffer.

I should really stick to unders only.

[Ab34]

good work

[Ez Money 77]

Hey good job Calvin. Honestly all the hate that goes on in this thread is unreal to me. I don't get it. I mean if you think something is flawed why not add more than, "This system sucks, it's flawed." I mean we are all here to help each other, or so I thought. Let FR know if there is something he can change/add to his system. Do u have to just go around saying everyone else is doing something wrong when all they are doing is putting something up for FREE that is only trying to help others? It's not like he is saying okay pay me $50 a week or no plays for you. U either tail/fade/stfu take your pick. Now I'm done.

[tb1984]

Good job, Frog.
These trolls are just jealous and smart-a s s. They just want to show-off their intelligence. Come on!!! give me a break, it's a freaking sports betting forum? Ok, we get it, you're a genius. But, why don't you bring your knowledge to a tech forum? Why do you have to talk down to people?

[MonkeyF0cker]

So sensitive.

I believe Mathy was just offering a warning.

Brock Landers went on a great run in 2008 or so. Doesn't. Mean. Anything.

[Extra Innings]

This guy should sell access to this gold mine.

[frogsrangers]

Look for plays tomorrow between 8 and 10:30 Pacific Time. 11 and 1:30 Eastern Time.

[Extra Innings]

Speaking of Gold Mines...I'm selling one, like new, for $180,000. There is at least 10 million worth of gold on this land. PM for details.

[tb1984]

He thinks I'm talking about him. Not even a chance. Don't be sensitive