Whats the difference between health care and car insurance?

[ttwarrior1]

For the last 30 years its been manditory to have car insurance.

One guy online is using this as as excuse that the health care is not unconstitutional

He's saying people are just against it just because its obama

what can i come back with?


nobody complains about buying car insurance

[ttwarrior1]

on a side note, this guy has never lost a debate about this , so doubt anyone can give me anything to use

[Cougar Bait]

Duh no one forces you to drive

It doesn't say life, liberty, and the pursuit of interstates.

[ttwarrior1]

good grief, almost everyone has a car and car insurance

[InTheDrink]

Wait you realize that the mandatory car insurance protects you when harming OTHER PEOPLE'S property?

Maybe the dumbest analogy ever.

[Monitor-Tan]

cuz that protects ANOTHER individual WHEN YOU **** up.

Health insurance is for your own shit. Who gives a shit if you have cancer and die or not. No one cares. That's for your own benefit.

But car insurance, other people do care, if you are wreckless and **** someone else's life or property. It's so you dun screw someone else over from your own mistake.

[paranoyd androyd]

so sick of this straw man argument, one of the worst around

[InTheDrink]

If the guy never loses a debate then it must be a two man message board with him and tt as the only members.

[ttwarrior1]

this is not my statement, its someone else

so what do i tell this guy again in english without people being trolls

Don't tell me, i said nothing

[ttwarrior1]

no he's a professor at south carolina

[MartinBlank]

There is no difference.

In fact, next time you go to your family doc, whip out your Safe Auto policy card.

That should work.

[jarvol]

First of all dumbass fatfukk warrior there is no federal law that stipulates a person must own auto insurance. Secondly no American is forced to own or operate an automobile. Thirdly the rest of us productive Americans really don't need to be subsidizing your cheeto eating, non-working, debt stiffing fatfukk dumbass anymore than the schmuck R's and schmuck D's in Washington already make us with their disgraceful welfare plans they have enacted over the past several decades.

[Duff85]

I'm not commenting one way or the other on Obama's solution. It may or may not be the right way to go. What I will say is that the US is one of only a handful of first world developed nations that do not have universal health care or compulsory insurance. At the moment the US is in good company with all of the second and third world shit holes.

[MC PICKS]

good grief, almost everyone has a car and car insurance

I guess you've never been to new york city, most people take cabs or walk as they do in other major cities as well. Buyng car insurance is only required if you want the priveldge to drive. The healthcare law basically is the same thing as the government forcing you to buy the car, get it. If you dont want to drive you are not required to buy insurance. Another example is flood insurance, you are not required to buy a house in a coastal town, but if you do you are required to buy flood insurance. The healthcare law is the same thing as the government forcing you to buy that house in a coastal town when you can live inland and save the money on flood insurance.

[King Mayan]

Americans are fat fukks that love to pollute their environment..(higher rates of diabetes and cancer will come from this)

They don't want to change..

Now pay up.

[ttwarrior1]

lol if u don't have car insurance and u have a car and u get caught u get a big fine

quit directing it towards me, none of this is mine

[ttwarrior1]

yeh here in kentucky, we should just walk and take the subway, quit thinking about yourself and answer the question

Still nothing to win a debate against this guys statement.

[mathdotcom]

Uhh Because car insurance protects against accidents between two drivers

Health totally different

[Cougar Bait]

TT like 4 different guys have given you plenty of ammo

Don't be a chicken shit

They aren't even remotely comparable

A sixth grader could win this argument

[ttwarrior1]

Example; south carolina

If you have a car and if you do not have insurance they cuff you and take you to jail. forced to get sr22 insurance, . It is the law,, the law in sc that you must , must have car insurance, no iff ands or butts about it

[ttwarrior1]

then why do they have liability vs collision if insurance is there just to protect other drivers

[InTheDrink]

Collision isn't mandatory you dumb fuk

[jarvol]

Example; south carolina

If you have a car and if you do not have insurance they cuff you and take you to jail. forced to get sr22 insurance, . It is the law,, the law in sc that you must , must have car insurance, no iff ands or butts about it

That is absolutely not true you dumbass fatfukk. You get a small fine and must provide proof of insurance within 30 days or the DMV suspends your license.

[Monitor-Tan]

Collision is for your own car. And collision is not required. Liability is.

[MartinBlank]

Collision isn't mandatory you dumb fuk

The fact that you even have to explain that to him is f'in hysterical.

The best part, you are explaining that to a grown man. A grown man who doesn't know or understand the differences between collision and liability is one of the funniest f'in things I have ever read on here.

[ttwarrior1]

your wrong foreigner jarvol

go look it up and quit with your nonsense

its the law in sc but you dont know that because your not in sc

and why are you stll directing it at me, im typing in his comments, not mine

[ttwarrior1]

no your saying insurance is to protect the other driver, if its not about protecting yourself then why offer anything else

[InTheDrink]

The fact that you even have to explain that to him is f'in hysterical.

The best part, you are explaining that to a grown man. A grown man who doesn't know or understand the differences between collision and liability is one of the funniest f'in things I have ever read on here.

Im 100% that this is a troll thread.


No one is this fukking stupid...not even tt.

[jarvol]

your wrong foreigner jarvol

go look it up and quit with your nonsense

its the law in sc but you dont know that because your not in sc

and why are you stll directing it at me, im typing in his comments, not mine

I have lived in SC for several years you dipshit fatfukk.

http://www.scdmvonline.com/dmvnew/default.aspx?n=insurance_requirements

If issued a citation, you will be required to provide proof of insurance for the vehicle that you were operating at the time within thirty (30) days to avoid an indefinite suspension of your driver’s license.</SPAN>

[CanuckG]

no your saying insurance is to protect the other driver, if its not about protecting yourself then why offer anything else

[MatI]

I'm not commenting one way or the other on Obama's solution. It may or may not be the right way to go. What I will say is that the US is one of only a handful of first world developed nations that do not have universal health care or compulsory insurance. At the moment the US is in good company with all of the second and third world shit holes.

[MC PICKS]

yeh here in kentucky, we should just walk and take the subway, quit thinking about yourself and answer the question

Still nothing to win a debate against this guys statement.

Has nothing to do where you live, thats why i gave you two examples, you do have rivers in that state right, which means you have coastal towns. I gave you a complete rational breakdown.

[MartinBlank]

I have lived in SC for several years you dipshit fatfukk.

http://www.scdmvonline.com/dmvnew/default.aspx?n=insurance_requirements

If issued a citation, you will be required to provide proof of insurance for the vehicle that you were operating at the time within thirty (30) days to avoid an indefinite suspension of your driver’s license.

Oh no. Jar is using facts. That shit is just going to confuse TT.

[ttwarrior1]

jarvol is a fraud and lying

2007 was 5 years ago

[PickWinnerAllDay]

no he's a professor at south carolina

A professor at a shitty academic college makes him credible?