The Broncos is playing for Andrew Luck!!!!

Bcatswin · 09-13-11, 12:24 AM

Roadtrip635 · 09-13-11, 12:25 AM

It's going to be a close race between The Broncos, Colts and Seahawks.

daimoshokage · 09-13-11, 12:29 AM

Originally posted by Roadtrip635

It's going to be a close race between The Broncos, Colts and Seahawks.

Broncos got it.. NOBODY should lose against the Raiders at HOME!!!

DrStale · 09-13-11, 12:37 AM

Originally posted by daimoshokage

Broncos got it.. NOBODY should lose against the Raiders at HOME!!!

Everyone in their division lost at home to the Raiders last year troll

daimoshokage · 09-13-11, 12:38 AM

^
Raiders fan..

Bcatswin · 09-13-11, 02:39 AM

^ Moron, never really had a prob with u before but these idiotic posts just seem to never stop. There is a reason my Bengals all year have been picked in power rankings as the 32nd team in the NFL. You think the Bengals beat them next week in Denver? If so lets bet all of our points on it. I'd say Denver ends up with maybe the 3rd or 4th worst record in the league.

Bcatswin · 09-13-11, 02:40 AM

daimoshokage · 09-13-11, 02:44 AM

Bengals is way better than the Broncos.. unless they start Tebow that's a different story..

John Fox is tanking this season to get Andrew Luck..

Bcatswin · 09-13-11, 02:46 AM

My offer on the bet still stands Jessica

Jimb0311 · 09-13-11, 02:56 AM

Lmfao...I just said this in another thread!

AZ*SUN*iBET4FUN · 09-13-11, 03:02 AM

Originally posted by daimoshokage

fukking disgrace organization.. losing to Raiders at home is the dumbest shit ever..

Disgrace is you betting on the broncos probably. WEEK 7 2010 Oakland @ Denver 59-14

SCUBS OF THE LEAGUE THIS YEAR Seattle/Chiefs/Broncos

Bcatswin · 09-13-11, 11:01 AM

Originally posted by AZ*SUN*iBET4FUN

Disgrace is you betting on the broncos probably. WEEK 7 2010 Oakland @ Denver 59-14

SCUBS OF THE LEAGUE THIS YEAR Seattle/Chiefs/Broncos

TR88 · 09-13-11, 11:04 AM

one of the most boring posters...daihomo

VegasInsider · 09-13-11, 11:10 AM

Why is everyone so against the Raiders?? They have a stud running back, decent enough QB and a solid defense. The Raiders could very well win the AFC West this year if the Chargers falter a little.

Blazermaniac · 09-13-11, 06:33 PM

Luck goes to the Colts. They know what they're doing. Colts will set an NFL record. Zero win this season just for the number 1 pick.

VegasInsider · 09-13-11, 06:35 PM

No way the Colts have the worst record in the league. Could very well be Minnesota..

ehp6737 · 09-13-11, 06:37 PM

What a freakin troll

bigsmitty · 09-13-11, 06:52 PM

I watched a good chunk of that OAK/DEN game and you could make a decent case for either team "trying to tank." OAK takes three (I think) major fouls in a row? Both teams have major difficulties to overcome (discipline being one of the major) but I fail to see any strategy to race to the bottom. I was on OAK +3 but just figuring two teams like that I may as well have the point cushion. Cheers

Blackroc78 · 09-13-11, 07:08 PM

D3 Mighty Ducks · 09-13-11, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by VegasInsider

Why is everyone so against the Raiders?? They have a stud running back, decent enough QB and a solid defense. The Raiders could very well win the AFC West this year if the Chargers falter a little.

Chargers have that division on lock.

leetreaper · 09-13-11, 08:19 PM

raiders is a better team in every f category, what r on smack ...lol ( not a raiders fan )

wtt0315 · 09-13-11, 08:23 PM

10-6 broncos will go. Dont just look at first game. Rush defense is horrid but our pass defense is good. A fumble away from winning last night. Steelers got beat by 60 and no one says a thing. dont jump to conclusions yet on this team

Jive · 09-13-11, 09:04 PM

If the Broncos were playing for Andrew Luck, Kyle Orton wouldn't have been named the starter.

tad0matic · 09-13-11, 09:31 PM

Originally posted by wtt0315

10-6 broncos will go. Dont just look at first game. Rush defense is horrid but our pass defense is good. A fumble away from winning last night. Steelers got beat by 60 and no one says a thing. dont jump to conclusions yet on this team

I dont think its jumping to conclusions when john fox is at the helm. He's such a dipshit! they should bring delhomo in to be the QB coach and trade teebow away. thats john fox football...

bigsmitty · 09-13-11, 09:39 PM

Originally posted by wtt0315

10-6 broncos will go. Dont just look at first game. Rush defense is horrid but our pass defense is good. A fumble away from winning last night. Steelers got beat by 60 and no one says a thing. dont jump to conclusions yet on this team

I agree to a point that one game does not make a team. But is it making too much of things to say that Orton's fumble was illustrative of his overall play? He can do well enough overall but things come unhinged at pivotal moments that are potential game winners? I personally would characterize Romo in this way but don't really know Orton well enough to say that at this point. Cheers

FilletMaster · 09-14-11, 12:14 AM

raiders just have the broncos number.. would be surprised if denver is even below .500 at years end.

daimoshokage · 09-14-11, 12:23 AM

Originally posted by Jive

If the Broncos were playing for Andrew Luck, Kyle Orton wouldn't have been named the starter.

They would be starting Tebow if they were NOT playing for Luck

Kyle Orton is a bum and Tebow is a winner..

DrStale · 09-14-11, 12:27 AM

Originally posted by daimoshokage

They would be starting Tebow if they were NOT playing for Luck

Kyle Orton is a bum and Tebow is a winner..

What about Brady Quinn troll?

daimoshokage · 09-14-11, 12:30 AM

^
Brady Quinn is a bust guy.. looks like you don't know football..

SportsPedagogy · 09-14-11, 12:31 AM

You ment to say "The Broncos ARE playing for Andrew Luck" I am not a grammar nazi, but common sense kills me. They are not playing for Luck. They have a week division and feel they have a chance to win it

daimoshokage · 09-14-11, 12:39 AM

Originally posted by SportsPedagogy

You ment to say "The Broncos ARE playing for Andrew Luck" I am not a grammar nazi, but common sense kills me. They are not playing for Luck. They have a week division and feel they have a chance to win it

looks you're a dumbfukk guy.. Whole organization = IS.. Taken as a whole prof. dumb..

SportsPedagogy · 09-14-11, 12:52 AM

If you said the organization is playing for Andrew Luck, that would be fine. But you said Broncos. That's plural. Kyle Orton is a Bronco, Tim Tebow is a Bronco, Brndon Lloyd is a Bronco... Together , they are the Broncos. It is plural and deserves "are"

DrStale · 09-14-11, 12:55 AM

Originally posted by daimoshokage

^
Brady Quinn is a bust guy.. looks like you don't know football..

Man you are dumb troll, obviously hes a bust, and if they were really playing for Luck theyd be starting Quinn.

Silly stupid troll.

daimoshokage · 09-14-11, 01:00 AM

^^
Orton and Quinn are bums.. whoever is starting between the two of them the result will be the same.. it will be a LOSS 100% guaranteed..

Now if they start Tebow that's a different story.. They now Luck will not fall on them because Tebow can win games you fukk..