IWinyourmoney.com.......NBA Play off the day! (Monday)

[Iwinyourmoney]

One play today. We finally broke our loosing streak!!!! We rolling 70% in the playoffs!!! (according to betlikeimbroke Im only hitting 55%..... )


Spurs @ Hornets.......HORNETS-2

Added 2nd half

Hornets -2

Spurs were up by 1 at half.

[pat venditto]

betting -110 all u need to hit to win is 53% so 55% would be ideal long term so **** the haters. gl

[SBR Lou]

I'm surprised you only like NO for game, I was thinking of betting 1st half, side, and ML.

[Iwinyourmoney]

I may do it before game time, just like the game so far

[diogee]

Riding the Hornets as well. GL Iwin...first half should be solid as well. No chance in hell the Spurs come out and shoot 9 of 17 from deep again.

[SBR Lou]

If we do take the first half too, careful guys, we can't count it as a play or Betlilimbroke99 will go into conniptions.

[bettilimbroke999]

I'm surprised you only like NO for game, I was thinking of betting 1st half, side, and ML.

ROFLMAO, fukin jackasses, admittedly betlikeimbroke did make me laugh but fuk I guess I'm nuts to think that you shouldn't be allowed to count your wins as 2 each, go on a hot streak then switch to singles so that you have to lose twice as many games as you win to be a dartboard capper. The funny thing is I actually like Iwin, his attitude is great, he loves sports/sports gambling, and he's a very good capper but let's just keep the records a lil more realistic that's all I'm saying. Either way best of luck hope you hit your next 100 picks, need to go on a run and help me get my cell turned back on after the 2-5 run just kidding. Cheers boys it's all good, we'll get em' eventually! I'm not half the jackass you degens think I am, I just want to do everything possible to increase the odds of winning.

[Iwinyourmoney]

If we do take the first half too, careful guys, we can't count it as a play or Betlilimbroke99 will go into conniptions.

[Iwinyourmoney]

ROFLMAO, fukin jackasses, admittedly betlikeimbroke did make me laugh but fuk I guess I'm nuts to think that you shouldn't be allowed to count your wins as 2 each, go on a hot streak then switch to singles so that you have to lose twice as many games as you win to be a dartboard capper. The funny thing is I actually like Iwin, his attitude is great, he loves sports/sports gambling, and he's a very good capper but let's just keep the records a lil more realistic that's all I'm saying. Either way best of luck hope you hit your next 100 picks, need to go on a run and help me get my cell turned back on after the 2-5 run just kidding. Cheers boys it's all good, we'll get em' eventually!

....although I strongly disagree with you on the record stuff, lets just all get paid and get that cell back on!!!

[chipski]

it is actually sheer brillance to belong to 3 or 4 different books and play 3 or 4 different wagers on the same game . there really is no such thing as correlation but we dont want to even go there . the o/u plays can miss by a half pt or hit by a half pt or a pt . is almost a joke alot of times watching this unfold in the last seconds of the 1st q , half ..
can be no different than spinning the wheel ***

spurs at hornets over 93.5 1st half was one of my plays and the first half score was 94 pts .
lines aint no joke alot of the time . (the list is as long as ....
is brillant to capitalize off of one game with multiple wagers and spread it around ( esp when it works out perfectly . ) 3rd eye

[bettilimbroke999]

it is actually sheer brillance to belong to 3 or 4 different books and play 3 or 4 different wagers on the same game . there really is no such thing as correlation but we dont want to even go there. the o/u plays can miss by a half pt or hit by a half pt or a pt . is almost a joke alot of times watching this unfold in th last seconds of the 1st q , half , all that .

spurs at hornets over 93.5 was one of my plays and the first half score was 94 pts .
lines aint no joke alot of the time .
is brillant to capitalize of one game and spread it around when it works out perfectly.

Clearly a genius . I once again ask anyone who thinks this to let me bet 1st half/game totals/side parlays at traditional -110 payouts of 2.7/1 and Paypal me the winnings at the end of the week (I think we should escrow the funds into some account as I don't trust but a small percentage of the posters). I've got thousands of dollars to lose on this theory if I'm wrong, just make sure you've got thousands of dollars to lose if you're wrong.

[Iwinyourmoney]

this is not the thread for this stuff!

[chipski]

we tend to think of the pistons in the east as defensive monsters right , so we tend to think under when they play .
we tend to think of the spurs as the same so we play under and correlate wagers like under for the first half ....
because we think like this does not mean the under will hit for the first half or for the game .
SO WHERE IS THE TRUE CORRELATION ?

LITERALLY > any game can go over or under by a pt or 2 or the half pt for 1st q , 2nd q , 3rd q , 4th q , 1st half and 2nd half . always

because we see teams matching up to reach certain #s does not erase the screw job , if it did we would not be in a forum . we would already know it all and there would be nothing to talk about .

dont forget about overtime too . we correalte a game to go under with 5 different wagers and the beaatch goes into ot .

[chipski]

yeah this is not the thread to break it down in , that would be the think tank . lol

[bettilimbroke999]

Thank you for enlightening me, I just wish you could enlighten bookmaker or betjam so that I could parlay these non-correlated wagers.

[Iwinyourmoney]

[SBR Lou]

Thank you for enlightening me, I just wish you could enlighten bookmaker or betjam so that I could parlay these non-correlated wagers.

They won't let you parlay them but they don't give a sh*t if you bet each one individually.

[bettilimbroke999]

They won't let you parlay them but they don't give a sh*t if you bet each one individually.

, moving right along. This has gotten to be the most boring conversation ever, what book would turn down a parlay on bets that didn't affect each other's outcomes, would make no sense unless they hate money and I support banning doubling as it manipulates records by doubling some picks and singling others. I am done arguing though white flag is up, I see no one cares about the validity of records, so I will just ignore the posted records for now on as they belong in a comedy club not a gambling forum.

[ChuteBoxe]

This whole debate can easily be ended. Why doesn't someone ask in the think tank, what the percentage over the past 10-20 years is, regarding a team winning both the half, and the game, in the same game ats. Then, we can see in the long run, whether his number is really inflated or not. Once and for all. I personally think the number will be lower than everyone thinks.

[babaoriley]

Who gives a sh!t? He could have just as easily lost both sides of these "correlated" wagers and had a horrendous record. I would like to see the back-checking done for entertainment reasons, but bottom line W-L% shouldn't be a question here, though the concern is duly noted.

[mofome]

Who gives a sh!t? He could have just as easily lost both sides of these "correlated" wagers and had a horrendous record.

obviously

[Panic]

Wow. This one's a tough one. Hard to go against the Spurs after an embarrassing lose. They usually respond very well after that. GL to everyone on this.

[dannyt76]

GL Iwin. I'm on the Hornets for the game and 1st half as well.

[EaglesPhan36]

Yeah I'm with the Spurs ML again. I thought going in they would get one of these 2 and still believe that.

[Panic]

Yeah. Duncan wont go 1-9 again. The hardest man on Duncan after a bad game is himself. He takes it personel. I'm thinking about laying the -120 on the prop bet that Duncan goes over 22.5 in pts. Hornets are a great team though and very tough at home. Just a hard game to roll on.

[SportNut]

....although I strongly disagree with you on the record stuff, lets just all get paid and get that cell back on!!!

[Iwinyourmoney]

Line is up to 2.5. Its still a good bet

[BuddyBear]

Line is up to 2.5. Its still a good bet

not really.....

[Iwinyourmoney]

not really.....

They already lost by 19, this time Hornets by 10

[Panic]

They already lost by 19, this time Hornets by 10

Last time the Spurs went down 2-0 in a series was 2001 against the Lakers. They got swept. They have been to the playoffs for the next 7 years straight and it hasn't happened since. Dont act so cavalier about it. Like its an easy bet. There is a reason the Spurs havent went down 2-0 to a team in 7 years.

[ILMW]

Kind of like no horse since 1929 or something like that won the derby from the 20 spot. Things happen and their is no such thing set in stone.

[Panic]

Kind of like no horse since 1929 or something like that won the derby from the 20 spot. Things happen and their is no such thing set in stone.

Comparing horses to basketball. Nice.

[Iwinyourmoney]

I never set its set in stone. I just think Hornets win by 10

[Panic]

I never set its set in stone. I just think Hornets win by 10

Hey, you know I'll be the first one to say you're a great player, but this game is a tough one. All the way around. I hope you hit. No doubt.

[Iwinyourmoney]

Hey, you know I'll be the first one to say you're a great player, but this game is a tough one. All the way around. I hope you hit. No doubt.

haha I love your signature Panic