Anyone who says mma is more dangerous to the brain then boxing, has no clue what they're talking about. The whole point of boxing is to hit someone in the head as many times as you can, over and over. And that goes on for 12 rounds In mma, you sometimes have entire fights that are on the ground and about submissions and wrestling, where guys barely get punched in the head. And that lasts 3 rounds, less then that on average.
What Are You Watching Tonite?? Boxing Or Strikeforce MMA??
Collapse
X
-
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#36Comment -
jacktheknifeSBR MVP
- 09-25-10
- 1217
#37
Except the kids part, they probably at least look for statistics before they take a test.
Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#38I don't think you know what you're talking about. You think a boxer, who gets hit in the head hundreds of times a day for his entire career, over and over and over. And then gets to fight night and takes 12 rounds of repetitive heads shots. Vs. a UFC fighter, who when he gets hit hard a couple of times, the fight is over. What causes more brain damage, 250 good shots to the head, or 2 good shots to the head? Oh yeah but that cauliflower ear sure is a nightmare.
And who makes money in boxing anymore? the top few guys? and they are at a much more serious risk of brain injury and plus they're competing in a dying sport. You really think there is better money overall to be made in boxing 10 years from now then in mma? If you're talking about today, then yeah, the top 5 boxers make more then the top 5 mma fighters. But that isn't going to last much longer.
Your average sports fan today probably can't name 2 of boxings 200 title holders from the last couple years. But they can probably name 3 or 4 of the ufcs 20.Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#40...Comment -
phillybadboySBR Hall of Famer
- 12-11-09
- 9383
#41sorry to bother you guys, but did the timothy bradley fight go over 9.5 rounds?Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#42Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#43Anyone who says mma is more dangerous to the brain then boxing, has no clue what they're talking about. The whole point of boxing is to hit someone in the head as many times as you can, over and over. And that goes on for 12 rounds In mma, you sometimes have entire fights that are on the ground and about submissions and wrestling, where guys barely get punched in the head. And that lasts 3 rounds, less then that on average.
But getting your head pounded into the mat for thirty seconds until the ref calls the fight is pretty brutal compared to getting punched in the head with 16 ounce gloves on, also I do not see any boxers getting windmill kicked in the head by a un-padded foot. Short term damge seems like it would be just as harmful if not more in the MMA for 1/10th of the salary.Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#46I was being sarcasticBut getting your head pounded into the mat for thirty seconds until the ref calls the fight is pretty brutal compared to getting punched in the head with 16 ounce gloves on, also I do not see any boxers getting windmill kicked in the head by a un-padded foot. Short term damge seems like it would be just as harmful if not more in the MMA for 1/10th of the salary.
I mean, most of these guys start this stuff b/c they actually want to learn to fight. And if you get in a street fight, you can't just choose whether to fight on the feet or ground. Boxing isn't fighting, it's just an aspect of fighting. MMA includes all aspects of fighting, so that you're prepared for anything. To me, it just makes sense to learn how to fight, instead of just learning how to box.Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#48
You do know what happens to people who assume right?Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#49Check the score card because the incidental head butt occured in the 10th round the judges had to score the round, not to mention the bell sounded for the 10th round.
If your bookie tries to claim otherwise he is fuking you.Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#50
What happens to people who assume? Do they turn out like you?Comment -
phillybadboySBR Hall of Famer
- 12-11-09
- 9383
#51right it didn't make any sense to me , thanksComment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#52Yeah it is more brutal 1 shot compared to 1 shot. But you're taking a hundred shots to 5. All i'm saying is that MMA is the way to go if you're a young, talented fighter.
I mean, most of these guys start this stuff b/c they actually want to learn to fight. And if you get in a street fight, you can't just choose whether to fight on the feet or ground. Boxing isn't fighting, it's just an aspect of fighting. MMA includes all aspects of fighting, so that you're prepared for anything. To me, it just makes sense to learn how to fight, instead of just learning how to box.
It would be interesting to see the caliber of athletes that would be competing in MMA if 10 years down the road their was more money in being an MMA fighter.Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#53Again I do not make assumptions I too have done my research and Brock lesnar to date has earned the highest payday for any MMA fighter at about half a million for 1 fight when you have top ranked boxers making 10 million dollar paydays for a fight. I do not need supportive evidence because I am not forecasting the future like you are I am basing this off of facts that we currently know.Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#54I agree MMA is good for learning self defense but I just can not see a talented young athlete chosen to pursue MMA over boxing until salaries for MMA fighters increase drastically its just to brutal of a sport to enjoy a long career in. It would be interesting to see the caliber of athletes that would be competing in MMA if 10 years down the road their was more money in being an MMA fighter.Comment -
Poppa CatfishSBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3352
#55I can't wait until the tennis player and futbol player wave hits MMAComment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#56Again I do not make assumptions I too have done my research and Brock lesnar to date has earned the highest payday for any MMA fighter at about half a million for 1 fight when you have top ranked boxers making 10 million dollar paydays for a fight. I do not need supportive evidence because I am not forecasting the future like you are I am basing this off of facts that we currently know.Comment -
IanSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-09-09
- 6056
#57
It seems most people who want to bash boxing do it reflexively without thinking about what they are saying.Comment -
urge2killSBR MVP
- 10-27-09
- 1722
#58There's been like 2 deaths in MMA and no cases of long term fighting causing brain damage. How does that compare to boxing? It doesn't because boxing is littered with retired and retarded vegetables.Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#59You have no clue what you're talking about, again. Do your research, i won't keep doing it for you. Brock Lesnar takes home over 5 million dollars for the fight you're talking about. And UFC has been popular for what, 6 or 7 years? And boxing has been popular for what, a 100 years? Using common sense, and mathmatics, and "statistical data", of which you seem to have none. think about how the salaries of top MMA fighters have risen in the last 10 years, what has it been a 300%, 400%, increase, or more? What about boxing....well Tyson and holyfield were making a 30 million purse 10 years ago. So the purse of the top guys in boxing has stayed the same, or gone down. Maybe a couple % increase if you want to generous.
Obviously salaries would expand as a sport went from an non televised sport to picking up a little mainstream attention a 300% increase is expected, look at the salaries of WWE wrestlers now compared to 10 years ago.
Let me know when Chuck Liddell starts buying tigers and 30 million dollar mansions until then you are simply making uneducated assumptions on future of the 2 sports.Last I saw George St Pierre was driving a toyota corrolla on "The Ultimate Fighter"
Comment -
Poppa CatfishSBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3352
#60toyota corolla just so happens to be a sponsor on the show. You don't say, and both coaches were driving corrollas, wow, sure is weird
(nobody help him out, lets see if he can put it together on his own)Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#61And then on top of all it you have crooked promoters like Don King stealing half of a man's purse. so what's that leave you? in the ufc, at least you don't have rampant corruption and criminals running the organization. That's why boxing has failed. Boxing could/should be great, but the crooks who run it won't let it happen. They take all the money for themselves. And that's why in a couple generations if you tell a kid you've been boxing for 10 years he will laugh at you, and then he'll put you on the ground and break your arm.
Anyway, you are bringing up things that everyone already knows. Wow, the highest paid 3 or 4 boxers in the world make more then the highest paid MMA fighters, as of today. I've already told you this like 4 times. Give me one common sense reason or "statistical data" that tells me boxing will be more successful then MMA in 10 years from now.Last edited by Tree Rollins; 01-30-11, 01:49 AM.Comment -
clarkd32SBR Wise Guy
- 09-15-06
- 863
#62so who was diaz yelling at outside the cage? he also mouthed some words that cannot be said to the individual after he threw his mouthpiece...Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#63Basically this went from you trying to argue that mma was more dangerous then boxing, to which to agreed you were wrong. To you trying to say that boxing has a higher chance for long term success/profitability then mixed martial arts, which is an argument you can't win, b/c you're wrong. Boxing is done. I wish it wasn't true, but it is. A bunch of crooks and dipshits have ruined a good sport. i liked boxing. But is so totally ****** up beyond repair. No one really gives a shit anymore. How is that going to change?Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#64And then on top of all it you have crooked promoters like Don King stealing half of a man's purse. so what's that leave you? in the ufc, at least you don't have rampant corruption and criminals running the organization. That's why boxing has failed. Boxing could/should be great, but the crooks who run it won't let it happen. They take all the money for themselves. And that's why in a couple generations if you tell a kid you've been boxing for 10 years he will laugh at you, and then he'll put you on the ground and break your arm.
Anyway, you are bringing up things that everyone already knows. Wow, the highest paid 3 or 4 boxers in the world make more then the highest paid MMA fighters, as of today. I've already told you this like 4 times. Give me one common sense reason or "statistical data" that tells me boxing will be more successful then MMA in 10 years from now. Basically, i'm still waiting for you to tell me something i don't already know.
The fact that boxers currently make 75X more than MMA fighters per fight suggests that the burden of proof is on you to prove that MMA fighters will be making more in 10 years as of right now you have not provided any evidence to believe this other than your opinion.
What part of this do you not understand?Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#65This is the problem here, you don't know anything. The fact that boxers currently make 75X more than MMA fighters per fight suggests that the burden of proof is on you to prove that MMA fighters will be making more in 10 years as of right now you have not provided any evidence to believe this other than your opinion. What part of this do you not understand?Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#66And do not put words in my mouth I never agreed that I was wrong I still believe 100% that MMA is a more brutal and taxing sport on your body on a per fight basis.
What are you 19?
Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#67This is the problem here, you don't know anything. The fact that boxers currently make 75X more than MMA fighters per fight suggests that the burden of proof is on you to prove that MMA fighters will be making more in 10 years as of right now you have not provided any evidence to believe this other than your opinion. What part of this do you not understand?Comment -
ttrace35SBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-10
- 10828
#68This is the problem here, you don't know anything.
The fact that boxers currently make 75X more than MMA fighters per fight suggests that the burden of proof is on you to prove that MMA fighters will be making more in 10 years as of right now you have not provided any evidence to believe this other than your opinion.
What part of this do you not understand?Comment -
Tree RollinsSBR MVP
- 12-16-09
- 3968
#69You're too simple. I cannot speak to you anymore.Comment -
sharpcatRestricted User
- 12-19-09
- 4516
#70
And again do you have a survey from the consensus bureau or something that proves that boxing is not as popular as it was 20 years ago. This sounds like another opinion of yours recent earnings for recent boxing matches compared to years past would suggest otherwise.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code