Are these correlated parlays

[hockey07]

Hey guys, i read a bunch on correlated parlays on SBR and i see that most of the talk is about the fav and the over or the dog and the under. If a player bets a team first half and parlays it with the same team for the complete game I would have to say that is a correlate parlay correct. Sorry for the stupid question.

[FourLengthsClear]

Yes.
Team total 1st half and Team total for the complete game have a high degree of correlation (degree to which one affects the other).
Books will not accept such wagers.

[hockey07]

im not talking about team totals im talking about spread and moneyline bets. For instance if a player wanted to bet the jets moneyline 1st half/ and jets full game moneyline. Would a book accept this bet?

[Gee]

I can't imagine a parlay being any more correlated.

Its like trying to parlay the ML and the spread for a favourite on any given game.

[hockey07]

ok thanks guys!

[FourLengthsClear]

im not talking about team totals im talking about spread and moneyline bets. For instance if a player wanted to bet the jets moneyline 1st half/ and jets full game moneyline. Would a book accept this bet?

No. Again the degree of correlation is too high.

There are a few markets available to parlay that offer a (small) mathematical advantage to the player. I could tell you what they are but then I would have to kill you.

[hockey07]

ok perfect. Now what about a team in football, like the packers were today, -3.5. Since its such a small spread would it be considered correlated to the over still? So you can't ever bet the fav ATS and the over in football in a parlay?