BIG 10 (LOGO/DIVISION) Is this is a Joke?

**CarpeDime** · 12-14-10, 07:45 PM

Originally posted by CollegeOverUnder

Wow I just logged on to ESPN to see this is this a joke? This is complete Failure on the Big 10s part and why is this this? The logo is complete garbage and the Division names are pure shit. I did like the Plains and Lakes names those would of been a badass division names but Legends and Leaders? It makes the teams that are in the Leaders division look like shit schools and the Legends look like there gods. This aint right. And Nebraska gets put in the cool name on there first go in the conference. Legends just beats the crap outta Leaders name wise. This is such a shame and im highly dissapointed in this. I give the names and new logo a HUGE F on this

"Legends" and "Leaders" how F*GGY can you get??

"We are LEADERS! We LEAD when we walk down the street AND when we play in football games!"

"We are LEGENDS because we play in this division! Have you ever been in the presence of a LEGEND?? Did you know that you are in the presence of one RIGHT NOW because you are standing next to me and I play for Nebraska?"

unreal

SO gay

**CollegeOverUnder** · 12-14-10, 07:58 PM

Originally posted by CarpeDime

"Legends" and "Leaders" how F*GGY can you get??

"We are LEADERS! We LEAD when we walk down the street AND when we play in football games!"

"We are LEGENDS because we play in this division! Have you ever been in the presence of a LEGEND?? Did you know that you are in the presence of one RIGHT NOW because you are standing next to me and I play for Nebraska?"

unreal

SO gay

**dfberger23** · 12-14-10, 08:01 PM

Such garbage. Should be Schembechler and Hayes.

**Jericholic** · 12-14-10, 08:04 PM

I wish it was a joke, terrible names.

**CollegeOverUnder** · 12-15-10, 12:47 AM

Originally posted by dfberger23

Such garbage. Should be Schembechler and Hayes.

**hokim** · 12-15-10, 01:10 AM

They should've changed the conference name first.

Why is it still big "10" while there are 12 teams now.

**dmtrader** · 12-15-10, 06:53 AM

The conference leaders like the Big 10 name - they think it has tradition and branding.

The division names are awful - obviously some ginned-up, ancient conference boosters came up with it. "Plains" and "Lakes" is better, but they put Nebraska and Iowa in with the Lakes schools (the Michigans, Minny, Northwestern). So that wouldn't work.

**CollegeOverUnder** · 12-15-10, 07:20 AM

Originally posted by hokim

They should've changed the conference name first.

Why is it still big "10" while there are 12 teams now.

there is some other conference called the Big 12 already Atleast I think there is

**floridagolfer** · 12-15-10, 07:59 AM

Originally posted by CollegeOverUnder

there is some other conference called the Big 12 already Atleast I think there is

What's the big deal about insisting there's a number attached to the name of the conference? Seems to me that the Big East, Mountain West, Southland, Atlantic Coast, etc., etc., avoid the latest problem where the number of teams in a league changes every month.

As far as the Big 10's new logos and division names, Abbott and Costello would be just as appropriate as the trash it selected.

**beach nut** · 12-15-10, 08:34 AM

Naming the divisions "Legends and Leaders" is ridiculously stupid. I hope that they come to their senses before next season starts.

**patswin** · 12-15-10, 09:08 AM

goofy names for sure

**Reload** · 12-15-10, 01:51 PM

Really one of the lamest ideas ever.