WagerWeb cheating sharp players

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rand790
    SBR High Roller
    • 12-31-07
    • 158

    #71
    Totally agree! They are awful................
    Comment
    • beetman
      SBR High Roller
      • 05-31-06
      • 220

      #72
      Any idiot that reads gambling message boards can figure out that the optimal way to use a free play is on something with a large payout like a parlay or a big underdog. How in the world can a legitimate book define that as "professional action?"

      That's almost as bad as the nine.com definition of a non-professional bettor as "someone who could bet either side of a game when the line is out."
      Comment
      • Rand790
        SBR High Roller
        • 12-31-07
        • 158

        #73
        This is why players should only play at SBR "A" or "B" rated books - avoid this pathetic place called WagerWeb.
        Comment
        • Shark79
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 11-19-07
          • 11211

          #74
          WWS = Shot Taker ... move along
          Comment
          • robmpink
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 01-09-07
            • 13205

            #75
            He is a moron. Most likely he takes shots at C and D books as well.

            His case and the bonus issues/professional player issues are like night and day.
            Comment
            • Doug
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 08-10-05
              • 6324

              #76
              Here's a much earlier case of theft. Casablancasports ( CBS) used to use the eye symbol of the broadcasting company CBS.

              CBS found out about it, sued them I think, thus the Wagerweb name change.

              The image “http://i.afterdawn.com/v3/news/cbs_logo.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
              Comment
              • Rand790
                SBR High Roller
                • 12-31-07
                • 158

                #77
                More proof that Wagerweb SUCKS !!
                Comment
                • bigboydan
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 08-10-05
                  • 55420

                  #78
                  03.18.2008 (09:34 PM CST)

                  WagerWeb (SBR rating C) refunds player's $600; agrees not to confiscate cash in amount of freeplay losses. The issue involved a player the book realized it did not want to service after two "sharp" wagers. As a result the player did not roll over the deposit as is required when free-play bonuses are accepted. Any players whose balance was debited for the amount of a losing free-play is encouraged to share his/her experience with SBR.
                  Comment
                  • robmpink
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 01-09-07
                    • 13205

                    #79
                    Originally posted by bigboydan
                    03.18.2008 (09:34 PM CST)

                    WagerWeb (SBR rating C) refunds player's $600; agrees not to confiscate cash in amount of freeplay losses. The issue involved a player the book realized it did not want to service after two "sharp" wagers. As a result the player did not roll over the deposit as is required when free-play bonuses are accepted. Any players whose balance was debited for the amount of a losing free-play is encouraged to share his/her experience with SBR.
                    Hey Dan, in recent history do you recall a book dropping two letter grades in a year? Excluding books like BOS and Cascade. I think the chances are slim that WW will drop to a D.
                    Comment
                    • bigboydan
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 08-10-05
                      • 55420

                      #80
                      Originally posted by robmpink
                      Hey Dan, in recent history do you recall a book dropping two letter grades in a year? Excluding books like BOS and Cascade. I think the chances are slim that WW will drop to a D.
                      The only one I can recall off the top of my head Rob that would fit the mold in regards to a calender year is BetMania. They were rated a B- and dropped to a D.
                      Comment
                      • Rand790
                        SBR High Roller
                        • 12-31-07
                        • 158

                        #81
                        Wagerweb should be dropped to a D - horrible sportsbook.
                        Comment
                        • purecarnagge
                          SBR MVP
                          • 10-05-07
                          • 4843

                          #82
                          if you want to see WW downgraded. Trying building a case with a real name on here other than WW sucks.... I mean cmon... Its hard to take anything seriously, when you don't even take yourself seriously...
                          Comment
                          Search
                          Collapse
                          SBR Contests
                          Collapse
                          Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                          Collapse
                          Working...