Difference between sharps and blood sucking bonus whore/scalpers. Great post by TOW

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • raiders72002
    SBR MVP
    • 03-06-07
    • 3368

    #1
    Difference between sharps and blood sucking bonus whore/scalpers. Great post by TOW
    How does a bookmaker sees pros? Here's my two cents...
    Some of you may recall that I've been at the helm of a sportsbook before starting the TOW venture.

    My friends across the street accused me in the past of being keen in taking the side of the operator in disputes, which isn't necessarily true. However I do look at disputes from both sides, bookmaker and player.

    Players often ask me how does a bookie sees wiseguys (professional players).

    Here is my two cents based on my experience behind the counter.

    I would first say that there are two main categories, honest pros and dishonest pros.

    An honest wiseguy comes in telling the book who he is thus failing to qualify for perks and bonuses (which we should all remember they are offered to recreational players to compensate their lack of betting knowledge).

    He doesn't mind having additional collars and restrictions (wagering limits, time within which he is allowed to bet on an event).

    In exchange he gets preferential payout timeframes and, most important, he is allowed to bet (remember, books are privately owned business that can refuse taking action at their choice).

    Honest wiseguys are usually allowed to wager higher amounts well ahead of time, from a day or two before the event up to several hours.

    Linesmakers often use their action to sharpen their lines. It's a fair give and take that substantially rewards both sides.

    Dishonest pros can be further devided into two sub-categories;

    The greedy and stupid one;

    The smart and sneaky one.

    The two common factors between the sub-categories is that both are bonus abusers (pros aren't entitled to bonuses and perks) and both usually bet within minutes of the event going off the board.

    The "greedy and stupid" is very easy to spot; he usually bets higher amounts and when confronted with the truth denies and threatens to go public.

    "I'm going to rip you a new asshole with TheRX and SBR" a dude once told me.

    "Why should you?" I asked. "I'm not revoking the bonus, not cancelling your bets, not confiscating your winnings...so why should I fear you?"

    "Either you allow me to keep getting my bonus or I will blast your book on all posting forums!" he contended.

    I told him to go ahead and be my guest. He eventually didn't.

    The confrontation arose because I used to handle these cases personally. Once risk management identified the account I would personally call the player and congratulate him twice; once for being such a good bettor and the second time for being able to circumvent our bonus policies.

    I would then go on informing the player that his past action would be validated and paid however if he wanted to continue to wager the wiseguys rules would apply to his account: no bonus whatsoever, betting collars, time within which we would accept his action and possible not acceptance of bets at our sole discretion.

    The second sub-category, the smart and sneaky is much harder to spot, especially when you run an operation with anywhere between 7,000 and 8,000 weekly actives.

    The smart and sneaky rarely bets over $200 a pop. Once in a while he throws in some losing bets intentionally just to keep below the radar. He also never allows his balance to run too high, thus remaining invisible.

    The smart and sneaky usually takes two or more payouts per month and keeps his balance tenfold his average bet size.

    Books eventually identify these kind of players yet they rarely put them under the wiseguys rules because of the limited betsize. However the accounts get flagged and kept under review at all times.

    Books like SportsInteraction would allow these guys to hit a certain amount of winnings and then boot them.

    VIP used to squeeze their limits to $20 or $30 and so on.

    My advice to season players is to always disclose what kind of player you are with your sportsbook. You will be treated fairly and never get in trouble.

    If you go the opposite route and abuse the book's bonus policy you may get lucky and be shown the door with your winnings intact or end up in a dispute that could lead to confiscation of your winnings at best.

    Remember: greed doesn't pay, honesty and disclipline do.

    GL with your plays.

    TOW
  • durito
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 07-03-06
    • 13173

    #2
    I think players all too often in this industry take the attitude that the "customer" is always right. Which is a very USA type attitude that doesn't really apply in lots of the world.

    Sportsbooks don't have to take anyone's action, and people should remember that. I prefer to draw as little attention to myself from books as possible.
    Comment
    • raiders72002
      SBR MVP
      • 03-06-07
      • 3368

      #3
      Good post Durito
      Comment
      • 20Four7
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 04-08-07
        • 6703

        #4
        I bet always below $500. I take bonus's and have a real job. But why is it that anyone who takes bonus's is a bloodsucker. If the books don't want to give it that's fine. But why is someone greedy if they take it. Also if even I was a pro certainly wouldn't call a book up and say I've got a great shot to beat you how much will you let me bet? The books should be establishing their lines based on bankroll, experience and the type of player they want. If they collar you that's fine by me. Almost every site says bonus's are for recreational bettors.
        Comment
        • acw
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 08-29-05
          • 576

          #5
          Why is it that some books do not discriminate and some just cannot survive without it?

          Regarding the real sharps (yes they do exist, not many though) trust me, they do not bet with Royal:
          Comment
          • Arilou
            SBR Sharp
            • 07-16-06
            • 475

            #6
            acw, for the same reason that some gamblers win and most gamblers go broke: Skill matters. So does your software, so does your share of the market, so does your overall approach - the higher your bonuses the more you must crack down. The same goes for expenses, both operations and advertising. It's also a matter of what they value: By kicking someone out, you both help yourself (he was going to win) and hurt yourself because you have less information and a worse reputation.

            A bonus is for whoever it is offered to, and I will gladly take any that you give me but not if taking it means doing things that otherwise make no sense and giving the book deposit/withdrawl expenses in the process. When I do that, I'm hurting the book a lot more than I would otherwise and this gives them incentive to deal with the problem.
            Comment
            • acw
              SBR Wise Guy
              • 08-29-05
              • 576

              #7
              Arilou,
              Obviously I know why!
              Personally I discriminate big time in the bets that I may take.
              I do not blame books for having this behaviour. What does bother me is that these bookies come into the forum and start telling you that this is the proper way how to deal with sharps while the truth is that (like me) they are too stupid to set up an operation that can take any action.
              Comment
              • SBR_John
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 07-12-05
                • 16471

                #8
                Originally posted by acw
                Arilou,
                Obviously ..... What does bother me is that these bookies come into the forum and start telling you that this is the proper way how to deal with sharps while the truth is that (like me) they are too stupid to set up an operation that can take any action.
                Amen. I've been in this racket a long time and I still can't understand why a book would limit action. Post a number you can make money on and take all you can. With Pinny, Betfair, TheGreek and others you can always manage your risk. I dont think they are stupid, just lazy.
                Comment
                • Justin7
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 07-31-06
                  • 8577

                  #9
                  I agree with disclosing that you're a pro. So many disputes are over bonuses, that I'd rather forgo it if I'm playing at a C or D book. When I'm playing at these lower books, it's usually for reasons other than bonuses - weak lines or certain promotions (teasers and props).

                  Re: smart and sneaky guys... No pro EVER throws money away.
                  Comment
                  • jjgold
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 07-20-05
                    • 388208

                    #10
                    Tow has gotten back about $800,000 from books that stole from players through the years.
                    Comment
                    • RickySteve
                      Restricted User
                      • 01-31-06
                      • 3415

                      #11
                      Originally posted by SBR_John
                      Amen. I've been in this racket a long time and I still can't understand why a book would limit action. Post a number you can make money on and take all you can. With Pinny, Betfair, TheGreek and others you can always manage your risk. I dont think they are stupid, just lazy.
                      With regard to this point, Saturday I tried to get down on the Red Sox to win Game 3 for $2500 at BetOnline. The line was -140 there and low -130s everywhere else. I was willing to take the worst of it because I had no liquidity elsewhere at that moment and was overexposed on Colorado. Management refused to accept more than $500. How can someone call himself a bookmaker and have a $500 maximum on a World Series money line far worse than the market consensus? I'm continually amazed by how poorly these places are run, with few exceptions.
                      Comment
                      • acw
                        SBR Wise Guy
                        • 08-29-05
                        • 576

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RickySteve
                        How can someone call himself a bookmaker and have a $500 maximum on a World Series money line far worse than the market consensus?
                        John,
                        This is what you call stupid and not lazy!
                        Comment
                        • genyes
                          SBR Hustler
                          • 01-14-06
                          • 75

                          #13
                          Do any professionals tell books "I am a professional. What are my limits?" Is it realistic for a book to expect a player to make that announcement? and why should a professional make that sort of announcement? Isn't it up to the book to manage it's customers? It seems to me that all a book should expect from its customers is that they act in an ethical manner, i.e. not to break the rules.
                          Comment
                          • ShamsWoof10
                            SBR MVP
                            • 11-15-06
                            • 4827

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RickySteve
                            With regard to this point, Saturday I tried to get down on the Red Sox to win Game 3 for $2500 at BetOnline. The line was -140 there and low -130s everywhere else. I was willing to take the worst of it because I had no liquidity elsewhere at that moment and was overexposed on Colorado. Management refused to accept more than $500. How can someone call himself a bookmaker and have a $500 maximum on a World Series money line far worse than the market consensus? I'm continually amazed by how poorly these places are run, with few exceptions.
                            Because they knew the right side... I used to use small books for middle tries and I would have to call management for approval... Oddly enough the ones they didn't allow a high limit on more often then not won and the ones they approved lost..more often then not of course... Now of course if I was you and this happens I would go to other books and load up on that side... The Red Sox in this case....

                            Comment
                            • Starion
                              SBR High Roller
                              • 01-12-07
                              • 149

                              #15
                              What type of action flags you as a professional?

                              This never makes any sense to me. If somebody wins they are automatically a pro?

                              They must be some rinky-dink operations if they're concerned about $200 bettors.

                              This reminds me of when I was in vegas betting $25 a hand in a Downtown Vegas casino. The pit bosses were watching me like a hawk. Betting $25 a hand on the strip nobody pays any attention at all.
                              Comment
                              • SBR_John
                                SBR Posting Legend
                                • 07-12-05
                                • 16471

                                #16
                                [QUOTE=Starion;397079]What type of action flags you as a professional?

                                This never makes any sense to me. If somebody wins they are automatically a pro?

                                QUOTE]

                                Understand that a "pro" is not usually a guy that can pick winners. Its a guy that can notice when a line is off. So a "pro" that books are looking to limit are the guys that take the bonus and sit and watch for the McNesse St line to be off and pound it with a limit bet. A lot of these happen at like 4am. So they are pretty easy to spot. They are placing large wagers on obscure games. Still, its the bookmakers job to offer a true and correct line. These guys are playing within the rules so I'm not knocking them. We defend them daily in disputes.
                                Comment
                                • 20Four7
                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                  • 04-08-07
                                  • 6703

                                  #17
                                  LOL John, when you talk about hitting up a line at 4 am I thought of me. I routinely place about 1/3 of my bets between 3:30 am EST and 5 am. Then play the US based sports from 6 pm to whenever.
                                  Comment
                                  Search
                                  Collapse
                                  SBR Contests
                                  Collapse
                                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                  Collapse
                                  Working...