[ABEHONEST]

Wow. Example: Duke wins by 2 tiny points on their home court over Clemson, an 11/9 team.
Duke's stats: 48% for FG's: 50% for 3's and 84.5% for FT's.
Hmm, you tell me?

Clemson: Crazy or not?
Fg: 40.8%, 3's, 42.3, and FT's ZERO. None.

[jjgold]

I would think only about four teams can win the title that’s not parody put on a day-to-day basis there’s a lot of parity

[ABEHONEST]

I would think only about four teams can win the title that’s not parody put on a day-to-day basis there’s a lot of parity

A worthwhile opinion, JJ.
I see at least 6. Whatever team gets hot in March will be right there in the Final Four.
Baylor looks very solid. Zags? We'll see in March.

[johnnyvegas13]

Could b value out there somewhere

like a lot of team 40-1 50-1 type odds that could win it all

[ABEHONEST]

Could b value out there somewhere

like a lot of team 40-1 50-1 type odds that could win it all

Probably so. I jumped on Michigan, for instance, back in March. Now it looks so ugly I don't want to even look those original odds.
Not over 15 I am pretty sure.

[ABEHONEST]

And those Zags again?
Do they have few wins [without checking] over rated teams in the top 15? 1, 2, or none? I will check.
And their conference? Not much comp, right?

One win over #8 Texas at the Zag's house.

[flakeandbake]

UCLA small and no other futures (unless sprinkling sweet 16, elite 8’s, final 4s) then re-evaluate after watching the first round in March

[johnnyvegas13]

UCLA small and no other futures (unless sprinkling sweet 16, elite 8’s, final 4s) then re-evaluate after watching the first round in March

I like UCLA but not sure juzang can carry them