[dxp]

Every game I bet there is some "luck" involved in the outcome! I just hope I am on the side that gets the luck!

I hope neither of you are saying that you know what will happen in ANY game when you factor in the spread!

You just bet the shit and hope you get the breaks that it takes to make you win!

I had a friend that used to say he wouldn't bet all star games or the Pro Bowl, or the East-West shrine game

because he said there was "no telling who might cover in those games!" LOL I said "who in the hell knows who

is going to win the spread in ANY game? You just bet the shit and hope you get lucky!"

that's a huge reason why i'm mocking him. washington didn't just get lucky, they got extremely lucky. he's searching for every excuse and insult to reason that washington was a great pick based on eagles injuries and a weird belief haskins can take care of the ball? i don't even know, he's all over the map.

even though i loved the celtics against the raps and thought they would win the series 4-1 or 4-2, i went big with toronto for numerous reasons in game 3. down 4 with a minute left and hitting a wild 3 with 0.5 left on the clock, NEVER would i claim that was a "great pick" instead of some blind luck

[JoeCool20]

Right. It was a terrible way for the Eagles to end up losing the bet. It is not any different that people "bragging"

about having the Chiefs in the super bowl last year. I mean everybody that had the chiefs would have

cancelled their whole bet WAY deep into the 4th quarter if there was such an option. But then all of a sudden

after the Chiefs had somehow comeback and won, they all started bragging on their "great pick!" LOL

[Eddy Munny]

Imagine being an adult and rooting for a green uniform like your life depends on it.

What a pathetic existence.

[Eddy Munny]

that's a huge reason why i'm mocking him. washington didn't just get lucky, they got extremely lucky. he's searching for every excuse and insult to reason that washington was a great pick based on eagles injuries and a weird belief haskins can take care of the ball? i don't even know, he's all over the map.

even though i loved the celtics against the raps and thought they would win the series 4-1 or 4-2, i went big with toronto for numerous reasons in game 3. down 4 with a minute left and hitting a wild 3 with 0.5 left on the clock, NEVER would i claim that was a "great pick" instead of some blind luck

Look at this loser still bumping a Miles Sanders thread because he thinks the "better" team should always cash.

Welcome to the NFL, noob.

[jjgold]

Phila is poorly coached, Wentz is definitely overrated also

[Eddy Munny]

The Washington Football team was EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZ money.

I love squares like dxp who fund palaces in the desert so exceptional soothsayers like myself can make out like bandits.

Eagles never had a prayer. Give Dxp a green skirt and some pom-poms so that little bitch can quit bellyaching in a Miles Sanders thread well past its expiration date. He's a jealous broke dikk fukk anyhow.

Bye felicia

[JAKEPEAVY21]

Agreed that Washington has one of the best dlines in the NFL. Couple that with Ron Rivera being a good defensive coach, they could be halfway decent this year. The other teams in the division are not that good either.

[Stringer Bell]

This guy is such an idiot defending the Eagles. Clearly the young Washington D-Line loaded with talent was possibly going to overwhelm an EXTREMELY banged up Philly O-line and that is exactly what happened all game long. Wentz was also part of the problem as he holds onto the ball far too long and that interception before half was brutal. But when a D-line has that big of an edge vs. a banged up O-line, the right side to be on is the D-line most of the time, especially getting 5-6 points. You just sound dumb when you say the Redskins got lucky winning/covering that game. The 2nd half was absolutely dominated by the Redskins.

[dxp]

it's funny how i casually read the SBR forums for like 10 years before posting to avoid nitwits and situations like this.

the banged up eagles had scoring drives of 62, 76 and 62 yards. wentz missed a streaking reagor for what should have been a 75 yard TD. he then missed jackson on the next play for a monster gain. he took a horrific sack that cost them an easy 3 points. he sailed/missed numerous throws in the 2nd half while taking foolish sacks. washington didn't "dominate" shit. and they were fortunate to avoid any real mistakes themselves.

that's exactly EVERYTHING they needed JUST to win a CLOSE game. they had maybe a 5% chance of winning down 0-17. a few clowns going to act like washington is a better team though or something, LOFL! nobody was taking them based on the hope wentz was going to have one of the worst games of his career. it took that, along with more and more eagle injuries, for washington to squeeze out a win.

and that was the simple point i was initially making. congrats, but it's nothing to brag on like it was a genius pick. sensitive sally, eddy , wants credit though. so to avoid seeing another weird rant laced with personal insults that make no sense.. i'll just say..

great pick, you really nailed it!

[Eddy Munny]

it's funny how i casually read the SBR forums for like 10 years before posting to avoid nitwits and situations like this.

the banged up eagles had scoring drives of 62, 76 and 62 yards. wentz missed a streaking reagor for what should have been a 75 yard TD. he then missed jackson on the next play for a monster gain. he took a horrific sack that cost them an easy 3 points. he sailed/missed numerous throws in the 2nd half while taking foolish sacks. washington didn't "dominate" shit. and they were fortunate to avoid any real mistakes themselves.

that's exactly EVERYTHING they needed JUST to win a CLOSE game. they had maybe a 5% chance of winning down 0-17. a few clowns going to act like washington is a better team though or something, LOFL! nobody was taking them based on the hope wentz was going to have one of the worst games of his career. it took that, along with more and more eagle injuries, for washington to squeeze out a win.

and that was the simple point i was initially making. congrats, but it's nothing to brag on like it was a genius pick. sensitive sally, eddy , wants credit though. so to avoid seeing another weird rant laced with personal insults that make no sense.. i'll just say..

great pick, you really nailed it!

You're picking out specific plays to "defend" your position that the Eagles were the right side but you can literally do that with any game under the sun that isn't some 30+ point blowout. Every game is four 15 minute quarters (yes, that's 60 minutes) made up of plays that swing momentum and change the course of events, and ultimately determine the outcome... So how is this game any diffferent?

You think Wentz throwing two interceptions represents a unique case in the history of tackle football? LMAO, interceptions are thrown that affect the win/loss column as well as the point spread every single week. The Redskins last turnover was a forced fumble after which they took the air out of the ball or else they could have padded the margin by an additional 3-7 points.

You have to be the biggest sore loser on the board. No wonder you don't post often, your head is so far up your own ass you can't see the forest for the trees. You're claiming I want credit, psh get the fukk outta here... My ticket pays out whether you acknowledge its validity or not. That's the only "credit" that matters. I posted one line in a thread that I didn't even start and you go absolutely ape shit. LOL keep at it, you miserable fukk... Keep petitioning a jury that doesn't exist. Maybe you'll get paid for your neverending butthurtedness.

The poster above you called you a "fukking idiot" and I couldn't agree more. Now carry on, you fukking idiot.

[Eddy Munny]

This guy is such an idiot defending the Eagles. Clearly the young Washington D-Line loaded with talent was possibly going to overwhelm an EXTREMELY banged up Philly O-line and that is exactly what happened all game long. Wentz was also part of the problem as he holds onto the ball far too long and that interception before half was brutal. But when a D-line has that big of an edge vs. a banged up O-line, the right side to be on is the D-line most of the time, especially getting 5-6 points. You just sound dumb when you say the Redskins got lucky winning/covering that game. The 2nd half was absolutely dominated by the Redskins.

Bingo. If these two teams played tomorrow with the exact same personnel, I would still take the home dog getting 5-6 points. The game would obviously unfold differently, but that's not to say that Washington wouldn't cover. Maybe this time they don't spot their opponent 17 points before showing signs of life. It could go a million different ways but the one constant would be that the Eagles would be overmatched up front. I'll pocket the points and let the chips fall where they may.

If the teams are at full strength and/or it's the 2nd meeting between them and Philly's OC schemes around protection issues, that changes everything, but then again so does the spread. You can only handicap what's in front of you.

Dxp = bookie's wet dream.

[dxp]

You're picking out specific plays to "defend" your position that the Eagles were the right side but you can literally do that with any game under the sun that isn't some 30+ point blowout. Every game is four 15 minute quarters (yes, that's 60 minutes) made up of plays that swing the momentum and change the course of events, and ultimately determine the outcome... So how is this game any diffferent?

You think Wentz throwing two interceptions represents a unique case in the history of tackle football? LMAO, interceptions are thrown that affect the win/loss column as well as the point spread every single week. The Redskins last turnover was a forced fumble after which they took the air out of the ball or else they could have padded the margin by an additional 3-7 points.

You have to be the biggest sore loser on the board. No wonder you don't post often, your head is so far up your own ass you can't see the forest for the trees. You're claiming I want credit, psh get the fukk outta here... My ticket pays out whether you acknowledge its validity or not. That's the only "credit" that matters. I posted one line in a thread that I didn't even start and you go absolutely ape shit. LOL keep at it, you miserable fukk... Keep petitioning a jury that doesn't exist. Maybe you'll get paid for your neverending butthurtedness.

The poster above you called you a "fukking idiot" and I couldn't agree more. Now carry on, you fukking idiot.

my god, you're incredibly slow and lacking simple comprehensive skills. let me break it down one last time for you, step by step. you might finally get it, but i doubt it.

- the eagles are better than washington.

- the eagles, with their injuries, are still better than washington.

- the eagles were nearly a touchdown favorite for that obvious reason.

- the eagles jumped out to a 17-0 lead because they are better. overall their offense is better. their defense is better. their special teams is better.

- the odds of washington winning as the game closed in on halftime was about 5%, if that. washington couldn't do shit with a full field against the eagles defense. that wasn't going to change.

LET THAT SINK IN, especially the last entry. because again, you're very slow.

- wentz probably played the worst game of his career. he literally stood in the pocket staring at rushers, repeatedly trying to duck at the last second instead of throwing the ball away or rolling out. his accuracy was worse than a 3rd stringer. he made crucial mistake after crucial mistake.

THE ODDS OF BLOWING THAT LEAD, THE PLAY CALLING AND WENTZ' ABSURD MELTDOWN HAPPENING AGAIN IS PROBABLY LESS THAN 1%.

so, here comes the shocking conclusion. are you ready? are you excited? do you know what it means? ANYONE WHO BET ON WASHINGTON TO WIN STRAIGHT UP WAS EXTREMELY LUCKY. nothing more, nothing less. the money is deserved just like every other winning wager. the only difference is, only a complete and total fuking degenerate clown would try to act like they made a great pick instead of laughing it off and saying "that's some bullshit, but i'll gladly take it!"

can you get that through your thick skull? i said washington won because wentz was garbage. most of the sports community.. bettors, analysts, writers, fans.. will tell you the same. YOU got bent out of shape like a fat girl getting dumped at the prom and started talking shit.

[Eddy Munny]

Go suck your bookie's dick. It's Monday, time to square up.

[Eddy Munny]

This guy is such a fukking idiot defending the Eagles. You just sound dumb when you say the Redskins got lucky winning/covering that game. The 2nd half was absolutely dominated by the Redskins.

[Eddy Munny]

Keep typing out play-by-play synopses of the game, Dxp. We love laughing at you!

[Eddy Munny]

Every Monday some bookie somewhere in the world is receiving a blowjob from DXP.

It's a tough life, but someone's gotta live it.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

O line bad because they didn’t address it via draft or FA.

Bottom line. Wentz isn’t a good QB. Marginal at best

[JoeCool20]

Who do y'all like in the two games on Monday night football tonight? The spread moved all the way to three on that late game.

[Eddy Munny]

O line bad because they didn’t address it via draft or FA.

Bottom line. Wentz isn’t a good QB. Marginal at best

Fair enough, but you didn't have to call DXP a mental retard. That's hurtful and he'll inevitably respond with a five-page transcript of the play-by-play to demonstrate how dominant his beloved Philly Eagles really were yesterday. All those sacks, all those turnovers, all those three-and-out drives... Philly was clearly humming on offense. Don't let the 15.5 point loss ATS fool you.

[JoeCool20]

Talk about luck and ridiculous breaks! NYG had 1st and goal on the 2 yard line and only got 3 points, then shitty-berg had a sure field goal at the end of the half and instead two tacklers totally whiffed on the WR and he got a touchdown instead to cover the 1st half spread.
That is also now an 8 point swing in regards to the eventual outcome of the whole game wager. What if somebody "bragged" about having PITT in the 1st half? LOL In order to win they had to hold NY to a field goal from 1st and goal at the 2, AND THEN have two Pro NFL players totally whiff a tackle with 7 seconds left in the half! LOL Hell it is all luck, and all a freakin joke! You just have to hope you are on the right side of the scheme!

[JoeCool20]

LOL Then the Giants run a NINETEEN play drive and then they throw an interception on the goal line and they get zero points out of it! And now PITT is already on the OTHER 20 yard line about to score themselves!

Man, whoever puts money on this shit because they think they know what is going to happen is incredibly naive.

[JoeCool20]

Then in the nightcap, Denver is in total control of the game, and their guy fumbles, and of course TENN turns it into a TD, and it is all of a sudden 7 to 7. So now Denver just gave away a 7 point swing in regards to the spread.
Who in the hell would try to "handicap" or "predict" that type of shit?
It is all a fukin joke! Instead of having DEN +3 you now have a swing of DEN-4 because of the giveaway!
Hell I thought everybody that gambled knew this shit was all freakin luck. Especially people on a gambling forum.

[JoeCool20]

Then DEN gets ZERO from the goal-line for ANOTHER 7 point swing. OMG
Then TENN goes all the way down the field and MISSES the field goal that would have won the 1st half spread!

OMG man who in the hell would waste their time trying to figure this shit out? It is a flaming joke!

[Eddy Munny]

Dxp = auto fade