[thomorino]

16-13 with the over in TB-Pitt pending

Jets-Jacksonville under 38 - Jets defense is for real but Darnold is still inconsistent, Bortles struggles against good defenses. Jets defense looked great against Cleveland before Mayfield came in and they had no game plan for him.

KC -4 - Denver's defense is overrated, the secondary is mediocre with Talib gone and the pass rush is inconsistent other than miller. The key to beating KC is to slow the game down and run the ball, Denver's run game is mediocore and Keenum hasn't been consistent.

Raiders -2.5 - Jets had no gameplan for Mayfield, the Raiders will be ready, Raiders offense has been solid, they've had at tough schedule so far.

[Easy-Rider 66]

Like OAK in this spot. GL.

[maggiethebestdog]

Oakland offense has scored 52 pts in 3 games
Solid

[johnnyvegas13]

Public will prob start pounding chiefs every week now

hard to ignore those numbers

but sooner or later the d will lapse and they hit a rough patch like last year

u might b good taking them here tho

[jjgold]

KC and Jets very square

Morino though likes the public side but nothing wrong with it

[thomorino]

KC and Jets very square

Morino though likes the public side but nothing wrong with it

Fuk off

[shocka1212]

KC and Jets very square

Morino though likes the public side but nothing wrong with it

actually, Raiders are a pretty square play.

[thomorino]

actually, Raiders are a pretty square play.

Fuk off

[thomorino]

Not that I care, I think Cleveland will get a lot of public action after how good Mayfield looks on primetime.

[johnnyvegas13]

Not that I care, I think Cleveland will get a lot of public action after how good Mayfield looks on primetime.

Somewhat agree

but I don't think mayfield is good

i must say brown d is top 10 tho making them hard to fade going foreward

[thomorino]

Somewhat agree

but I don't think mayfield is good


i must say brown d is top 10 tho making them hard to fade going foreward

I agree Mayfield isn't that good, he almost threw a key interception because he couldn't see over the offensive lines head, I don't think Cleveland D is that good though, Darnold isn't a good quarterback and Pitt moved the ball easily on them.

[MMANick]

Not that I care, but I'm going to respond.

Fuk off over and over.

The act is so fukkin old it's ridiculous.

[thomorino]

Not that I care, but I'm going to respond.

Fuk off over and over.

The act is so fukkin old it's ridiculous.

Fuk off

[thomorino]

17-13 after hitting with the over in Pitt-Tampa Bay

[Playmaker]

The Broncos are having problems in the secondary as Carr hit 93 percent of his passes I believe and Flacco hit for 63 percent? Broncos better get pressure on Mahomes or they will get murdered...Broncos Offensive Line regressed last week as well.. I think the Chiefs also have the Broncos number beating them 5 straight times...Good Luck

[thomorino]

I agree, Denver's defense is thought to be elite because they still have some players remaining from the super bowl years, but its a very average defense overall.

[thomorino]

I'm adding the Rams -6.5, Grffin is their best pass rusher and the Viking defense isn't the same on the road, peters and Talib should be fine.

[Easy-Rider 66]

I'm adding the Rams -6.5, Grffin is their best pass rusher and the Viking defense isn't the same on the road, peters and Talib should be fine.

Saw a report that Talib and Peters were out. Would not touch Minn though with Everson Griffin situation being played out.

[gauchojake]

Talib is out and probably needs surgery. Peters injury isn't as bad as initially thought, but he could be out too. We will probably know today.

[thomorino]

Peters is day-to-day, I think he plays, Talib should be fine long-term, but looks like will may miss this game. The Griffin situation should be a distraction in addition to him being their best pass rusher.

[SharpAngles]

Not that I care but betting on a rookie QB -4 in prime time at Denver is a bad idea.

[thomorino]

Not that I care but betting on a rookie QB -4 in prime time at Denver is a bad idea.

I don't know anyone who would argue that Denver is a harder place to play than Pittsburgh, and he's not a rookie, he's a first year starter. I think the fact that its primetime will keep KC focused, a rookie QB off a record setting performance might be flat the next game. Denver's defense is nothing special, very mediocre secondary.

[Pick'nParlays]

they should trend upwards after last weeks TNF

[Yankfan4life2]

Tough to bet against mahomes and the chiefs and agree that denver's secondary is mediocre now but I think this week will be a test for him with two great edge rushers in von and chubb. If broncos don't expose him this week, the jags most certaintly will next week. BOL

[thomorino]

Tough to bet against mahomes and the chiefs and agree that denver's secondary is mediocre now but I think this week will be a test for him with two great edge rushers in von and chubb. If broncos don't expose him this week, the jags most certaintly will next week. BOL

I don't think Chubb is anything special yet, Wolfe is good not great, I don't see Denver's pass rush as anything special, they get no push in the middle

[ikid2groove415]

Not that I care but betting on a rookie QB -4 in prime time at Denver is a bad idea.

Look at this pathetic dumb bitch with 30 names - following me around - don’t you have 2 beg people to go pro? So you can pocket that hundo? Lollololol lollol

[Grosshhit]

I'm adding the Rams -6.5, Grffin is their best pass rusher and the Viking defense isn't the same on the road, peters and Talib should be fine.

Rams are a very square play

[JayDr3am]

Oakland offense has scored 52 pts in 3 games
Solid

thats probably the best thing you can do. is legit say rubbish in your posts and you can some what count over a 3 week period. congrats

oakland has scored 52 points in 3 games but is also 0-3? what are you even saying?? that has nothing to do with the outcome of this game you fuccking bozo

[thomorino]

Rams are a very square play

Fuk off

[thomorino]

thats probably the best thing you can do. is legit say rubbish in your posts and you can some what count over a 3 week period. congrats

oakland has scored 52 points in 3 games but is also 0-3? what are you even saying?? that has nothing to do with the outcome of this game you fuccking bozo

I agree, the Raiders faced good defenses and were on the road for 2 of the first 3, they still led at the beginning of the 4th in most of their games.

[JayDr3am]

I agree, the Raiders faced good defenses and were on the road for 2 of the first 3, they still led at the beginning of the 4th in most of their games.

no i agree with your angle morino. maggie the SBR police is just a penetrating idiot and that specific comment literally said nothing of value lol he will just creep and chime in wherever he can.

he legit opened up the raiders schedule and brought out his calculator to add up how much theyve scored over 3 weeks. woah dude.

stating how many points they scored week to week doesnt even come close to correlating how they could easily lose this game outright and be 0-4. browns have done 3 things the raiders cant seem to do in the 4th.. play defense, make a come back, and also win.

[maggiethebestdog]

thats probably the best thing you can do. is legit say rubbish in your posts and you can some what count over a 3 week period. congrats

oakland has scored 52 points in 3 games but is also 0-3? what are you even saying?? that has nothing to do with the outcome of this game you fuccking bozo

Lol
You can't make this shit up

[JayDr3am]

Lol
You can't make this shit up

so oakland scoring 52 pts over 3 weeks of football makes them a great pick and secure win. auto lock right maggie? why are you even in these posts? youre not even betting dude. its not your "financial incentive" cause youre BROKE dude. just a fat grimlin trolling. let people who are actually picking games talk.

[maggiethebestdog]

so oakland scoring 52 pts over 3 weeks of football makes them a great pick and secure win. auto lock right maggie? why are you even in these posts? youre not even betting dude. its not your "financial incentive" cause youre BROKE dude. just a fat grimlin trolling. let people who are actually picking games talk.

Unreal
He picked the Raiders and said their offense was solid the 1st 3 weeks
I posted the point total to show how stupid he was
But then you stepped in and upped the stupid to a whole new level

[JayDr3am]

whats your point in them scoring 52 pts over 3 weeks?? what does that have to do with anything.. when thats not even close to being the most in the NFL. lol what is your point maggie in post #3