1. #1
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    MLB - Tuesday, 6/20/17

    1 MLB Side Tuesday

    Pirates +105 (Bookmaker)


    YTD: 267-284-15, -6.61

    Totals Coming

  2. #2
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    2 MLB Plays Tuesday

    2 MLB Plays Tuesday

    Pirates +105 (Bookmaker)
    Red Sox / Royals UNDER 8.5 -105 (5 Dimes)

  3. #3
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    1 MLB Addition

    3 MLB Plays Tuesday

    Pirates +105 (Bookmaker)
    Red Sox / Royals UNDER 8.5 -105 (5 Dimes)
    Tigers / Mariners UNDER 9 +105 (Heritage)

  4. #4
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    2 More MLB Additions

    5 MLB Plays Tuesday

    Giants +104 (Heritage)
    Pirates +105 (Bookmaker)
    Padres / Cubs UNDER 8.5 +110 (Heritage)
    Red Sox / Royals UNDER 8.5 -105 (5 Dimes)
    Tigers / Mariners UNDER 9 +105 (Heritage)
    Last edited by LT Profits; 06-20-17 at 12:12 PM. Reason: Meant Cubs Under 8.5+110

  5. #5
    pilebuck13
    pilebuck13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-15-15
    Posts: 17,889
    Betpoints: 1717

    What did yah end up getting ml in Minnesota white Sox? Seems like Santana a tad overvalued

  6. #6
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Note my correction on Cubs Under. I chose Under 8.5 +110 over a juiced Under 9 but accidentally typed Under 9 +110 originally.

  7. #7
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by pilebuck13 View Post
    What did yah end up getting ml in Minnesota white Sox? Seems like Santana a tad overvalued
    Yes he does, I get Twins 58% (-138). Thing is Holland is not that good either, these are two of my pending regression pitchers opposing each other.
    Points Awarded:

    pilebuck13 gave LT Profits 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  8. #8
    Conqueror
    Conqueror's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-08-13
    Posts: 16,075
    Betpoints: 5420

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Yes he does, I get Twins 58% (-138). Thing is Holland is not that good either, these are two of my pending regression pitchers opposing each other.
    Then OVER should be a good play.

  9. #9
    pilebuck13
    pilebuck13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-15-15
    Posts: 17,889
    Betpoints: 1717

    Quote Originally Posted by Conqueror View Post
    Then OVER should be a good play.
    Conquer that's where I'm headed.

  10. #10
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by Conqueror View Post

    Then OVER should be a good play.
    Quote Originally Posted by pilebuck13 View Post

    Conquer that's where I'm headed.
    Regression seems to be built into the 9.5 total, I get 9.8

  11. #11
    RavensFan2k3
    Handicappin' like I'm Trappin'
    RavensFan2k3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-12
    Posts: 17,377
    Betpoints: 18704

    Please thoroughly explain to me why Giants here

  12. #12
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by RavensFan2k3 View Post
    Please thoroughly explain to me why Giants here
    There is absolutely no reason why the Giants offense should be as bad as it has looked now that they have all of their regulars back, which suggest I may be on them quite a bit until they go into seller's mode. On paper at least, they have the far superior L/R splits here, although you would not know it looking at only this season. Model has San Francisco 53% (-113).

  13. #13
    RavensFan2k3
    Handicappin' like I'm Trappin'
    RavensFan2k3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-12
    Posts: 17,377
    Betpoints: 18704

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    There is absolutely no reason why the Giants offense should be as bad as it has looked now that they have all of their regulars back, which suggest I may be on them quite a bit until they go into seller's mode. On paper at least, they have the far superior L/R splits here, although you would not know it looking at only this season. Model has San Francisco 53% (-113).
    Ok you mentioned alot about offense, but what about Matt Moore and Teheran?

  14. #14
    44 Mag
    44 Mag's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-14-13
    Posts: 34,467
    Betpoints: 12882

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Yes he does, I get Twins 58% (-138). Thing is Holland is not that good either, these are two of my pending regression pitchers opposing each other.
    Every pitcher YOU don't like is regressing???? Then you use xFIP etc. numbers that nobody understands. LOL. I even went on Sabermetrics on pitchers and THEY don't have them, never mind rate pitchers by them. What about when you predict guys to be an Ace, like Nola, Aka LOLA. This guy gets hammered, and I noticed you don't take him much, not that anybody should. The standard for pitchers is good enough for me, never mind all this made up bullshit.

  15. #15
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by RavensFan2k3 View Post
    Ok you mentioned alot about offense, but what about Matt Moore and Teheran?
    Not enough separation to swing Braves to favorites. Yes, Teheran grades out 8% better for me (Teheran slightly below average, Moore 8% more below average), but that gets offset by Giants grading out much better vs. righties offensively and Braves grading out worse vs. lefties, around a 13% edge in batting splits.

  16. #16
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by 44 Mag View Post
    Every pitcher YOU don't like is regressing???? Then you use xFIP etc. numbers that nobody understands. LOL. I even went on Sabermetrics on pitchers and THEY don't have them, never mind rate pitchers by them. What about when you predict guys to be an Ace, like Nola, Aka LOLA. This guy gets hammered, and I noticed you don't take him much, not that anybody should. The standard for pitchers is good enough for me, never mind all this made up bullshit.
    You are 100% off here, pitchers tend to regress to their sabermetric numbers, not the other way around. And I love xFIP because it incorporates the most important stats my model uses, namely K/BB and flyballs/groundballs. Those stats have much less to do with luck than common stats like ERA and WHIP.

  17. #17
    RavensFan2k3
    Handicappin' like I'm Trappin'
    RavensFan2k3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-12
    Posts: 17,377
    Betpoints: 18704

    I guess agree to disagree. Goodluck LT

  18. #18
    44 Mag
    44 Mag's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-14-13
    Posts: 34,467
    Betpoints: 12882

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    You are 100% off here, pitchers tend to regress to their sabermetric numbers, not the other way around. And I love xFIP because it incorporates the most important stats my model uses, namely K/BB and flyballs/groundballs. Those stats have much less to do with luck than common stats like ERA and WHIP.
    And I suppose wins & losses, weather, ballparks, revenge, and certain players playing or not playing have nothing to do with it???? Are you kidding me???? The pitcher isn't the only single reason some team wins or loses a game. Is it ?????

  19. #19
    44 Mag
    44 Mag's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-14-13
    Posts: 34,467
    Betpoints: 12882

    [QUOTE=LT Profits;27040479]You are 100% off here, pitchers tend to regress to their sabermetric numbers, not the other way around. And I love xFIP because it incorporates the most important stats my model uses, namely K/BB and flyballs/groundballs. Those stats have much less to do with luck than common stats like ERA and WHIP.[/QUOTE]

    And by the way, a pitchers ERA & WHIP are Luck ??????? Please, spare us the details of this ridiculous statement, LUCK ??????? I suppose when Kluber won his

  20. #20
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by 44 Mag View Post
    And I suppose wins & losses, weather, ballparks, revenge, and certain players playing or not playing have nothing to do with it???? Are you kidding me???? The pitcher isn't the only single reason some team wins or loses a game. Is it ?????
    Of course not (i.e., you are correct), and my model incorporates pitching, hitting (with adjustable default lineups), defense, ballpark factors and umpires (after Game 1 of series). It is just that pitching (starters and bullpen) counts the most. And model stats are 90% saber based.

  21. #21
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    [QUOTE=44 Mag;27040557]
    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    You are 100% off here, pitchers tend to regress to their sabermetric numbers, not the other way around. And I love xFIP because it incorporates the most important stats my model uses, namely K/BB and flyballs/groundballs. Those stats have much less to do with luck than common stats like ERA and WHIP.[/QUOTE]

    And by the way, a pitchers ERA & WHIP are Luck ??????? Please, spare us the details of this ridiculous statement, LUCK ??????? I suppose when Kluber won his
    xFIP is FAR superior to ERA and/or WHIP, both of which can be skewed by team defense, favorable./unfavorable ballparks and even little things like the official scorer. Oh and not to mention extremes in BABIP, which the pitcher has no control over.

  22. #22
    MiTzRacEr07
    MiTzRacEr07's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-17-17
    Posts: 43
    Betpoints: 204

    Anyone playing pirates vs brewers? Or astros vs As? Havent seen much on these ones today. I like the brewers and the astros today. Havent played yet though..

    Brewers -122
    Astros -102

  23. #23
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by MiTzRacEr07 View Post
    Anyone playing pirates vs brewers? Or astros vs As? Havent seen much on these ones today. I like the brewers and the astros today. Havent played yet though..

    Brewers -122
    Astros -102
    Pirates were first game I played, Post #1. Looks like I got shitty line though.

  24. #24
    juicername
    Thomorino - Fade and Get Paid
    juicername's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-14-15
    Posts: 6,906
    Betpoints: 3972

    Davies getting his lit up in Milwaukee.

  25. #25
    RavensFan2k3
    Handicappin' like I'm Trappin'
    RavensFan2k3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-12
    Posts: 17,377
    Betpoints: 18704

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Pirates were first game I played, Post #1. Looks like I got shitty line though.
    Who cares, a winner is a winner. Beating the closer doesn't matter.

  26. #26
    chosen4th
    chosen4th's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-29-12
    Posts: 1,106
    Betpoints: 886

    LT- thought u were taking a totals break??

  27. #27
    grey area
    grey area's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-17-14
    Posts: 1,182
    Betpoints: 1604

    Quote Originally Posted by chosen4th View Post
    LT- thought u were taking a totals break??
    Just needed to pound the first one really

  28. #28
    JayDr3am
    Handi
    JayDr3am's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-06-14
    Posts: 18,259
    Betpoints: 8206

    lol so lucky with the giants pick. no way in hell you saw that one coming. holy shit

  29. #29
    stackz125
    stackz125's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-03-16
    Posts: 6,094
    Betpoints: 206

    Quote Originally Posted by chosen4th View Post
    LT- thought u were taking a totals break??
    He still play them just not laying anymore than -110 juice.

  30. #30
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by chosen4th View Post
    LT- thought u were taking a totals break??
    I said I would be playing fewer of them due to not laying more than -110 as of now.

  31. #31
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Another nice night, 7-1-1 to begin the week.

  32. #32
    chosen4th
    chosen4th's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-29-12
    Posts: 1,106
    Betpoints: 886

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Another nice night, 7-1-1 to begin the week.
    Nice start to week!

Top