[Snowball]

You people fail to realize we need the Saudi's help in fighting terrorism and radical Islam..

That's b.s. JIBBY, don't make excuses. The facts are the Saudis have sponsored terrorism
for many years in Syria and Iraq, and in Libya and everywhere there is Al-Queda, ISIS, Daesh,
you name it, Saudis and Israel are backing it. They want to take out Iran and Syria who does zero terrorism.
The Saudis were put there by the British Zionists. Installed as sheiks just like the whole Arabian peninsula,
fake kingdoms who oppress their people - and want war to destroy the Shia who commit no terrorism at all.

[reigle9]

do you think "saudis" are one group that has the same ideals and gameplan?

rhetorical question

jesus fukk

[Nitrogen]

With the exception of the Roger Stone types, people aren't upset that he bowed/curtsied/lowered etc.

They are simply pointing out his blatant hypocrisy.

When you are reliant on countries who are

- theocracies
- have citizens who finance enemies of your own
- outright opposite of you on rights etc

But you need them for either resources or geopolitical balancing, then it's not worth creating tension with them over a custom. Whether it was Reagan dedicating a shuttle launch and being cozy with the Taliban, Clinton looking chummy with Arafat, GW holding hands with the Saudi, Obama bowing or Trump doing whatever he was doing.

Only one of these leaders railed against his predecessor(s) like Trump has. It's become an online joke that for every action Trump does, there's an angry tweet about someone else having done the exact same thing.

That's it. No one really gives a f@k if Trump bowed or genuflected. It's just funny to not only see him doing exactly what other former leaders have, but to see those same outraged people now defending him.

[DwightShrute]

With the exception of the Roger Stone types, people aren't upset that he bowed/curtsied/lowered etc.

They are simply pointing out his blatant hypocrisy.

When you are reliant on countries who are

- theocracies
- have citizens who finance enemies of your own
- outright opposite of you on rights etc

But you need them for either resources or geopolitical balancing, then it's not worth creating tension with them over a custom. Whether it was Reagan dedicating a shuttle launch and being cozy with the Taliban, Clinton looking chummy with Arafat, GW holding hands with the Saudi, Obama bowing or Trump doing whatever he was doing.

Only one of these leaders railed against his predecessor(s) like Trump has. It's become an online joke that for every action Trump does, there's an angry tweet about someone else having done the exact same thing.

That's it. No one really gives a f@k if Trump bowed or genuflected. It's just funny to not only see him doing exactly what other former leaders have, but to see those same outraged people now defending him.

except he didn't. Kind of a huge difference actually. Trump leaned over to accept a medal. Others bowed. Not sure why so many of you refuse to see it. Oh actually I do know why. No need to explain.

Any person can see the blatant difference but obviously not everyone will admit it. Something that is true doesn't require your belief.

[reigle9]

the funny thing is, he could do a legit curtsy and it would matter fukkin zero...who cares?

just today's talking point, will be forgotten tomorrow when the next insanity is up to bat

[Nitrogen]

except he didn't. Kind of a huge difference actually. Trump leaned over to accept a medal. Others bowed. Not sure why so many of you refuse to see it. Oh actually I do know why. No need to explain.

Any person can see the blatant difference but obviously not everyone will admit it. Something that is true doesn't require your belief.

I didn't think he bowed. But he definitely seemed to do some sort of curtsy. Neither mattered to me.

I also however believe he was making fun of that disabled reporter back during the campaign. Strong hunch you disagree. (Just pointing out how 2 views of the same thing are interpreted)

He had the perfect opportunity to blast Radical Islamic Terrorism by calling it BY NAME while in Saudi giving his speech, but failed to.

Now, was it because strategically it's not wise to stand in the shadow of Mecca and throw shade at your hosts because they (right or wrong) would feel slighted and you have a pending arms sale? Or was he just exhausted and skipped over that line on the teleprompter speech? (Remember how teleprompters were for the weak?)

All through the campaign we were told Trump isn't a politician.
He's outright made impossible promises (He's smarter than the generals, Mexico will pay for the wall that'll be built on day one, the replacement for Obamacare will be cheaper and better). He's pandered within his party for votes purely for optics. He's taken credit for things already done before him. Promised he'd release his taxes. Lied about his opponents.

He's exactly like other politicians.

[JIBBBY]

That's b.s. JIBBY, don't make excuses. The facts are the Saudis have sponsored terrorism
for many years in Syria and Iraq, and in Libya and everywhere there is Al-Queda, ISIS, Daesh,
you name it, Saudis and Israel are backing it. They want to take out Iran and Syria who does zero terrorism.
The Saudis were put there by the British Zionists. Installed as sheiks just like the whole Arabian peninsula,
fake kingdoms who oppress their people - and want war to destroy the Shia who commit no terrorism at all.

What? Every Muslim/Arab Country in the Middle East has some form of Radical Islam in it.. Saudi's certainly have terrorist groups in their boarders but clearly no longer support or sponsor it..

Saudi's on our side right now.. Iran is not.. That's the difference... Trump spoke boldly against Radical Islam to all the Arab leaders when he was in Saudi Arabia.. He was welcome and applauded...

[DwightShrute]

I didn't think he bowed. But he definitely seemed to do some sort of curtsy. Neither mattered to me.

I also however believe he was making fun of that disabled reporter back during the campaign. Strong hunch you disagree. (Just pointing out how 2 views of the same thing are interpreted)

He had the perfect opportunity to blast Radical Islamic Terrorism by calling it BY NAME while in Saudi giving his speech, but failed to.

Now, was it because strategically it's not wise to stand in the shadow of Mecca and throw shade at your hosts because they (right or wrong) would feel slighted and you have a pending arms sale? Or was he just exhausted and skipped over that line on the teleprompter speech? (Remember how teleprompters were for the weak?)
All through the campaign we were told Trump isn't a politician.

He's outright made impossible promises (He's smarter than the generals, Mexico will pay for the wall that'll be built on day one, the replacement for Obamacare will be cheaper and better). He's pandered within his party for votes purely for optics. He's taken credit for things already done before him. Promised he'd release his taxes. Lied about his opponents.

He's exactly like other politicians.

I can show you absolute proof he never made fun of a reporter's disability. Trump has denied if several times and its been debunked several times. It was easily the biggest lie in the entire campaign. The proof seems to be that you still believe it. I started threads with absolute proof it was a lie.

He never said Mexico will pay for the Wall on DAY ONE. Never. There are several ways to make Mexico pay for the Wall. Its early. Let's see what happens. Same with healthcare.

He did say he would release his taxes and I never believed he would and I hoped he wouldn't. Just like I don't believe and never have believed he would deport 11 million or so illegals. Its called politics. He will use that as a bargaining chip for something else. AS far as lying about his opponents, ok fair enough but surely you aren't saying he's the only one that did? If so, then hahaha.

anyways, here's the proof that Trump never mocked a reporter's disability. The first is the short version and the second goes into dept proving the it was fabricated story by the Washington Post. Educate yourself if you dare. Even most of the biggest Trump haters agree he never did mock a disabled person's for being disabled. https://www.catholics4trump.com/the-...rs-disability/







https://www.sportsbookreview.com/for...media-lie.html

[reigle9]

prayers

[reigle9]

i added them cause of dog pics

[Nitrogen]

I can show you absolute proof he never made fun of a reporter's disability. Trump has denied if several times and its been debunked several times.

Him denying it is not proof he wasn't mocking the reporter. If you want to parse words, I said he made fun of the disabled reporter. I didn't say he made fun of his disability. He just HAPPENS TO HAVE a disability that causes him to carry himself coincidentally in the same manner that Trump made fun of him for. Oh, and these other examples, none of them were as flailing or dramatic, but that's ok. I believe Trump had a vague memory of the guy, didn't realize he was disabled, and was just mocking the movements of someone who seemed to act spastically.

He never said Mexico will pay for the Wall on DAY ONE. Never. There are several ways to make Mexico pay for the Wall. Its early. Let's see what happens. Same with healthcare.

He constantly said Mexico would pay and that he'd get started on day 1. He didn't say he'd reshape trade arrangements and juggle import taxes to offset the cost of building it. He said they would pay. I believed from day 1 that he would pivot to this after the campaign, but tell me that isn't a classic politicians move?

He did say he would release his taxes and I never believed he would and I hoped he wouldn't.

So because he flat out lied, but you didn't want him to do something, you're ok with the provable lie. But you choose to believe other statements, even though that is an outright provable lie.

It's not a promise that he can't fulfill - he could very easily clear it up. He never had any intention to - that's quite obvious. A flat out lie.

He made some claim about wiping out ISIS in 30 days etc. That's obviously not right (and just a bit insulting to our troops and allies who fight an enemy that wears no uniform and lives among families and in hospitals). But it's not an outright lie.

If you actually care about leaders having outside influence (many back in the Clinton days were concerned not that he got a BJ, but that his affair could be used as blackmail. Or that Lewinsky, being so young, could easily be co-opted by a foreign power and used to either spy or shape his agenda).

Transparency about possible influence is never a bad thing.

[DwightShrute]

Him denying it is not proof he wasn't mocking the reporter. If you want to parse words, I said he made fun of the disabled reporter. I didn't say he made fun of his disability. He just HAPPENS TO HAVE a disability that causes him to carry himself coincidentally in the same manner that Trump made fun of him for. Oh, and these other examples, none of them were as flailing or dramatic, but that's ok. I believe Trump had a vague memory of the guy, didn't realize he was disabled, and was just mocking the movements of someone who seemed to act spastically.

He constantly said Mexico would pay and that he'd get started on day 1. He didn't say he'd reshape trade arrangements and juggle import taxes to offset the cost of building it. He said they would pay. I believed from day 1 that he would pivot to this after the campaign, but tell me that isn't a classic politicians move?




So because he flat out lied, but you didn't want him to do something, you're ok with the provable lie. But you choose to believe other statements, even though that is an outright provable lie.

It's not a promise that he can't fulfill - he could very easily clear it up. He never had any intention to - that's quite obvious. A flat out lie.

He made some claim about wiping out ISIS in 30 days etc. That's obviously not right (and just a bit insulting to our troops and allies who fight an enemy that wears no uniform and lives among families and in hospitals). But it's not an outright lie.

If you actually care about leaders having outside influence (many back in the Clinton days were concerned not that he got a BJ, but that his affair could be used as blackmail. Or that Lewinsky, being so young, could easily be co-opted by a foreign power and used to either spy or shape his agenda).

Transparency about possible influence is never a bad thing.

that is simply a lie. If you watched the second video, you would see that. If TRUMP was mocking the reporter, he wouldn't be waving his arms around like he did. He would be perfectly still because the reporter's disability does not cause his arms to move around at all.

He never said that on day 1 Mexico would pay for it. Even you aren't that naive not to know there is such a thing like the congress. He said they will pay for it and there is nothing so far that you can say he is wrong about it. Maybe the US taxpayer will get the bill initially but Mexico will pay for it one way or another. Tariffs or taxes on money wires back to Mexico. There are dozens of ways to make it happen.

There is no law that Trump is required to release his taxes. Ya he said it and it drove you guys nuts. I never believed he would release em and especially after he won his historical landslide victory. There is no benefit for him to do so.

No sane person believed that he would wipe out ISIS within 30 days. Its called talking a good fight. Just as when someone say they are gonna beat the shit out of you. No one really thinks that there will be all of your shit all over the ground. Just as when someone said they laughed their head off. No one thinks there are decapitated audience members at the show. Surely not the same as saying you can keep your doctor and that your premiums will go down. Also, remember that it took Obama over a year to pass obamacare.

[Nitrogen]

There is no law that Trump is required to release his taxes. Ya he said it and it drove you guys nuts. I never believed he would release em and especially after he won his historical landslide victory. There is no benefit for him to do so.

Not that anyone didn't already know this from reading your posts, but this is where you're exposed as merely being a troll and not actually interested in debate.

#1 - I never said it was law. I said he promised it, then refused. He lied. Whether it drives people nuts and gives you pleasure is secondary. I bet people with pre-existing conditions who heard him promise "everyone will be covered" are now sweating bullets also being driven nuts to the laughter and pleasure of some of his supporters who felt that was a bad promise to make.

#2 - By no metric was it a historical landslide victory. Not by electoral college previous results, not by (obviously) popular vote standards. None. But it's something he has said, and you repeat it. It was historic in that polls had hillary winning by 1-3% (which she did in the popular vote). But for a gambling site, having a +500 dog win outright is not exactly unheard of. He won enough electoral votes and thus is POTUS. Historic in that poll after poll had her up by a couple points.

But Brexit and other elections prove that when there is a non conventional choice or candidate, often there is a small group who may claim to be undecided, who actually are on board in a big way.
A landslide? Hardly.

[DwightShrute]

Not that anyone didn't already know this from reading your posts, but this is where you're exposed as merely being a troll and not actually interested in debate.

#1 - I never said it was law. I said he promised it, then refused. He lied. Whether it drives people nuts and gives you pleasure is secondary.

#2 - By no metric was it a historical landslide victory. Not by electoral college previous results, not by (obviously) popular vote standards. None. But it's something he has said, and you repeat it. It was historic in that polls had hillary winning by 1-3% (which she did in the popular vote). But for a gambling site, having a +500 dog win outright is not exactly unheard of. He won enough electoral votes and thus is POTUS. A landslide? Hardly.

there is very little, if any, debating you on which is worthwhile. I like how you refused to even admit you being wrong about the reporter Trump never mocked. Just as expected, I was right as usual and .... well I don't need to say it.

I said he did lie about releasing his taxes. I don't care that he lied about it. I don't care that Bill Clinton lied about getting a blow job either.


306-232 is a landslide victory. Not the biggest ever electoral college victory ever and that wasn't implied. But arguably the biggest political upset in world history. He was +6000 when he announced. Maybe even a tad higher. I got him at +4000 in June 2015. On November 8th after the first polls close he was still at over +1000 and I kept putting in bets he would win. Even after an hour after the polls closed, I was betting and getting +350 to +550 on Trump winning. Then, it went to -1100 in flash. Then all the media and liberals started crying. Then the term snowflake was basically born. Then America started recovering from the previous 16 years.

The popular vote in completely irrelevant in a general election. Trump schlonged the bitch.

[Nitrogen]

The popular vote in completely irrelevant in a general election. Trump schlonged the bitch.

The term Snowflake (politically) was not "basically born" because of it. It came about in England (for the most part) from that book "I find that offensive!"

But focus on the word "basically" to explain instead of how you pull stuff out of your ass (which creates kind of a weird russian nesting doll situation when you consider how far up Trump's ass you are)

[DwightShrute]

[reigle9]

that is so gross dude

[reigle9]

has to suck being a girl

[wikkidinsane]

No one is questioning he bowed his head to put medal on. Its the second little curtsy he did after the medal was completely secured around his neck. Stop spinning it boys. Ya boy trump is not too proud to bow down like a dog that he is!

[wikkidinsane]

The term Snowflake (politically) was not "basically born" because of it. It came about in England (for the most part) from that book "I find that offensive!"

But focus on the word "basically" to explain instead of how you pull stuff out of your ass (which creates kind of a weird russian nesting doll situation when you consider how far up Trump's ass you are)

Trump contradicts himself on a daily basis on twitter. I will try to post a topic a day based on this hypocrite

[wikkidinsane]

Donald "Double dipping" Trump
Hahahaha

[wikkidinsane]

Here we go again. Medal around neck...and bow down again!

[wikkidinsane]

[chico2663]

You people fail to realize we need the Saudi's help in fighting terrorism and radical Islam.. Has nothing to do with Trump sucking up to Saudi's.. Besides the Saudi's has been our allies for over half a century.. They are an Arab Country we have been working with for a very long time.. We need their help to fight back ISIS...

Trump is doing the right thing... Better their troops then ours fighting ISIS..

So they are going to do what they haven't done in 20 years? The only ones that ever fight is jordanians. Unless you count the saudi's fighting for isis. They throw money at the clerics so that they won't rise up on them

[MinnesotaFats]

I'm actually shocked that the Washington Post is calling that a bow, in contrast to Obama bowing in submissive form of greeting. Trump bent over to accept a medal, not in the form of introduction. The social aspect here is Apple's and oranges and this is really journalistic malpractice. God help anyone who reads print news anymore at face value, without that video you'd have two different perceptions of reality here.

[chico2663]

What? Every Muslim/Arab Country in the Middle East has some form of Radical Islam in it.. Saudi's certainly have terrorist groups in their boarders but clearly no longer support or sponsor it..

Saudi's on our side right now.. Iran is not.. That's the difference... Trump spoke boldly against Radical Islam to all the Arab leaders when he was in Saudi Arabia.. He was welcome and applauded...

Iran didn't plot and pay for 9-11. Iranians weren't the guys on the planes.

[DwightShrute]

[DwightShrute]

Iran didn't plot and pay for 9-11. Iranians weren't the guys on the planes.

your family members probably

[chico2663]

The term Snowflake (politically) was not "basically born" because of it. It came about in England (for the most part) from that book "I find that offensive!"

But focus on the word "basically" to explain instead of how you pull stuff out of your ass (which creates kind of a weird russian nesting doll situation when you consider how far up Trump's ass you are)

Snow flake was called by my group about the millennials . That 's the problem with the retards today they change everything. They used it in Fight Club in 1999 to talk about crybabies that needed a timeout. Sort of like dwight everytime something is said about fuhrer

[chico2663]

Snow flake was initially used for people that wanted to free the slaves before the civil war. Google it.

[khicks26]

Give it up already. The hypocrisy is Trump going to Saudi Arabia.

So post as many bow vids as you want.

[chico2663]

Trump could actually stick a dick in his mouth and dwight would deny it. fuckking snowflack troll

[DwightShrute]

Trump could actually stick a dick in his mouth and dwight would deny it. fuckking snowflack troll

if anyone stuck a dick in my mouth I would deny it. Gross. You would post it on instagram to make your dad jealous.

[jtoler]

Dweit's a funny cat.

[FrozenMAN]

He bowed to receive the medal ya dumb liberal penetrates, he didn't bow like obammy did. Obammy was bowing in regards to showing respec which is all he did during his apology tour across the world that he went on when he first took office and first started destroying the country

i do add though his bow was odd...as if his back is fused...(Probably because he's a russian puppet blah blah blah...where's rachel maddow spouting her retardedness on the subject???