April Ladder Challenge (Prize Pool Doubled)

[BHExchange]

After reviewing the picks, there were a couple instances early in his streak where taterhead quoted an incorrect line from the 'best odds' brick in the matchup pages. No fault of his own, but those lines were never available on the line history.

Therefore, DwightShrute is the winner of the April Ladder Challenge - congrats! I will reach out via PM to get your payment details.

We will need to revisit the structure of this contest as too many issues arose during this month. Thanks all for playing!

Awesome contest, just need to figure out how to police it better. Just mikejamm can't do it all by himself!

[pavyracer]

After reviewing the picks, there were a couple instances early in his streak where taterhead quoted an incorrect line from the 'best odds' brick in the matchup pages. No fault of his own, but those lines were never available on the line history.

Therefore, DwightShrute is the winner of the April Ladder Challenge - congrats! I will reach out via PM to get your payment details.

We will need to revisit the structure of this contest as too many issues arose during this month. Thanks all for playing!

Agreed. Maybe split it into two contests. One for regular game lines and one for just props. No issues with regular game lines as those can be very easily reviewed by all players on multiple sources. And thanks for the contest and congrats to DwightShrute!

[Krashman]

Final: LA KINGS 6-5
$ 528.66 ---> $ 1,057.32

Congrats!

[mikejamm]

Final: LA KINGS 6-5
$ 528.66 ---> $ 1,057.32

Congrats Dwight.

[mikejamm]

I totally had it won. Gotta get a lot more organized.

Yeah, sure you did.

[Headsterx]

Congrats Dwight!

[SBR Andy]

After reviewing the picks, there were a couple instances early in his streak where taterhead quoted an incorrect line from the 'best odds' brick in the matchup pages. No fault of his own, but those lines were never available on the line history.

Therefore, DwightShrute is the winner of the April Ladder Challenge - congrats! I will reach out via PM to get your payment details.

We will need to revisit the structure of this contest as too many issues arose during this month. Thanks all for playing!

[brumbies]

grats

[Igor_1965]

Well played winners, and nearly winners. How many people LOST a bet that would get them over the finish line? At least 3? This has gotta be a record lol

[Ian]

Final: LA KINGS 6-5
$ 528.66 ---> $ 1,057.32

Congrats on a well earned victory.

[CARDANOS]

Congrats Dwight and Taterhead. Nice plays.

[Getch13]

Nice Job Dwight

[stevenash]

Final: LA KINGS 6-5
$ 528.66 ---> $ 1,057.32

Good work DS!

[Optional]

[DwightShrute]

NHL
Monday, April 21, 2025
Edmonton - Los Angeles
Over 5.5 +100
$ 528.66

Final: LA KINGS 6-5
$ 528.66 ---> $ 1,057.32

[BHExchange]

Not up to me. But like you guys I have been thinking have to use the correct posted odds so if over +200 I could not take it. It's not really a mathematical advantage though I guess.

Shame this is coming down to rule issues on multiple entries this month.

I totally had it won. Gotta get a lot more organized.

[BHExchange]

and Another One Bites The Dust!

It's also pretty likely (50/50) Edmonton game isn't getting past 5. 0-2 at the first intermission

Looks like a 4-1 Kings win to me

[mikejamm]

Wasn't trying to jinx. Looks like he was smart and bet Chelsea to win at 14/1 towards the end to get something out of this. Both people who came close to win the $1000, had tremendous hedge opportunities with minimal risk especially when you don't pay to play in this contest. How often as a gambler you get presented with the opportunity to choose how much money to win without sweating the bankroll as you don't need a bankroll to play this contest?

Totally agree bro. You try to help them and good advice gets ignored by noobs.

[mikejamm]

4/20 - 10pm - NHL -Edmonton vs LA Over 5.5 -112 FD $10

[DwightShrute]

Not up to me. But like you guys I have been thinking have to use the correct posted odds so if over +200 I could not take it. It's not really a mathematical advantage though I guess.

Shame this is coming down to rule issues on multiple entries this month.

I am not saying he used a greater than +200 odds prop and posted +200, but if he did, then the only thought that goes through my head is "This is why we can't have nice things!" A free contest

Several times I wanted to use a prop bet where the odds were over +200, and just barely over in many cases, but I would never consider purposely changing those odds because that's obviously against the rules.

[Optional]

they won't get by Andy or Opti. Of course you can't use +200 if the odds were longer.

Not up to me. But like you guys I have been thinking have to use the correct posted odds so if over +200 I could not take it. It's not really a mathematical advantage though I guess.

Shame this is coming down to rule issues on multiple entries this month.

[DwightShrute]

I often looked at player props and didn't bet, because they were +230 or even +205. I assumed posting +200, when current odds were, in fact, longer, was illegal.

So once these two winners on Tatis and Lindor are verified, this fun-filled, insane contest will be officially over.

Well done, regardless of whether you win or get DQed on a technicality lol!

they won't get by Andy or Opti. Of course you can't use +200 if the odds were longer.

[Optional]

4/21 $430.68 MLB NYY -1.5 +140 v CLE Draftkings

and Another One Bites The Dust!

[BHExchange]

Wasn't trying to jinx. Looks like he was smart and bet Chelsea to win at 14/1 towards the end to get something out of this. Both people who came close to win the $1000, had tremendous hedge opportunities with minimal risk especially when you don't pay to play in this contest. How often as a gambler you get presented with the opportunity to choose how much money to win without sweating the bankroll as you don't need a bankroll to play this contest?

I actually got Lindor HR at +435 and over 1.5 bases at +122 at crypto books. Made more money here, than on my small Chelsea +1400 ticket the other day.

[BHExchange]

I often looked at player props and didn't bet, because they were +230 or even +205. I assumed posting +200, when current odds were, in fact, longer, was illegal.

So once these two winners on Tatis and Lindor are verified, this fun-filled, insane contest will be officially over.

Well done, regardless of whether you win or get DQed on a technicality lol!

[BHExchange]

4/21. MLB Francisco Lindor record an RBI +200 betmgm $340.41 payout $1021.23.

Exhibit B

[BHExchange]

4/20. Tatis jr MLB record RBI +200 DK $113.47

Exhibit A

[makaveli66]

$30 on Dallas Stars +128 BetRivers

[Krashman]

NHL Los Angeles Kings -1.5 +200 Bet365

$10 to win $20

[trobin31]

4-20 Royals +194 prophetx $10
4-21 Cardinals +185 mgm $28

[cade]

4/21 $86.16 edm/la u5.5 -110 caesars

[CARDANOS]

4/20 $10 MLB Kansas City ML +185 DK
4/21 $28.50 MLB St. Louis ML +180 DK

[pavyracer]

Ha! You jinxed his ass, lol Congrats to what? Losing? Never say “miracle” and “Congrats” when karma is in play.
Ahh the soccer gods.

Wasn't trying to jinx. Looks like he was smart and bet Chelsea to win at 14/1 towards the end to get something out of this. Both people who came close to win the $1000, had tremendous hedge opportunities with minimal risk especially when you don't pay to play in this contest. How often as a gambler you get presented with the opportunity to choose how much money to win without sweating the bankroll as you don't need a bankroll to play this contest?

[pabonaparte]

4/21
Under 5.5 Edmonton@LA NHL
10 > 19
-110 at Caesars

[taterhead]

4/21. MLB Francisco Lindor record an RBI +200 betmgm $340.41 payout $1021.23.