Army/Navy Game Broke every college football betting record possible

johnnyvegas13 · 12-13-21, 06:55 PM

I would think opposite

most watching this one were just fans

Brock Landers · 12-13-21, 06:57 PM

Favorite losing outright killed the public for certain

JacketFan81 · 12-13-21, 07:05 PM

Gold took Army ML at huge juice, let's not forget that before he drops his "knowledge" on us

jjgold · 12-13-21, 07:08 PM

Sportsbooks got hurt on the total

Renegades · 12-13-21, 07:23 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

Sportsbooks got hurt on the total

Of course. They need to start posting this gm at 30-31

Renegades · 12-13-21, 07:24 PM

Army/Air Force went to OT and they only scored 35.

mtofell · 12-13-21, 07:31 PM

No surprise.... if there's only one fat girl at the bar at closing she's going to get lots of attention.

LT Profits · 12-13-21, 07:50 PM

Public won HUGE on the Under, that "remarkable streak in play". Under now 15-0 last 15 Army/Navy games and 41-9 last 50 Armed Forces games.

stake1 · 12-13-21, 08:59 PM

Total killed the books far greater than the side

Otters27 · 12-13-21, 09:12 PM

41-9 wow

Mike Huntertz · 12-14-21, 12:19 AM

Originally posted by mtofell

No surprise.... if there's only one fat girl at the bar at closing she's going to get lots of attention.

I was there!

thetrinity · 12-14-21, 12:45 AM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Public won HUGE on the Under, that "remarkable streak in play". Under now 15-0 last 15 Army/Navy games and 41-9 last 50 Armed Forces games.

There was 48 points in 10 and 11. You are saying those both went under? Someone else said it was 17 straight before the game. I was trying it look it up myself but I could only confirm 6 straight.

rm18 · 12-14-21, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by thetrinity

There was 48 points in 10 and 11. You are saying those both went under? Someone else said it was 17 straight before the game. I was trying it look it up myself but I could only confirm 6 straight.

Navy was one of highest scoring teams in the nation in that era lots of totals in the 70's vs other teams

stevenash · 12-14-21, 01:47 AM

Originally posted by mtofell

No surprise.... if there's only one fat girl at the bar at closing she's going to get lots of attention.

Fat bottom girls make the rockin' world go round.

TheMoneyShot · 12-14-21, 01:54 AM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Public won HUGE on the Under, that "remarkable streak in play". Under now 15-0 last 15 Army/Navy games and 41-9 last 50 Armed Forces games.

Not necessarily true. I have a lot of friends who are new at gambling.... and the low total made them take the over. Some people just don't look at stats between 2 teams. You set a total at like 35... people just take the OVER because it looks so low.

stevenash · 12-14-21, 02:30 AM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

Not necessarily true. I have a lot of friends who are new at gambling.... and the low total made them take the over. Some people just don't look at stats between 2 teams. You set a total at like 35... people just take the OVER because it looks so low.

Or as I like to say "It's 35 for a reason"

hehfest · 12-14-21, 05:22 AM

Originally posted by stevenash

Fat bottom girls make the rockin' world go round.

And they help re-populate the Earth with bald fat people that have low IQ's. Don't forget!

stevenash · 12-14-21, 06:26 AM

Originally posted by hehfest

And they help re-populate the Earth with bald fat people that have low IQ's. Don't forget!

Take the good with the bad.
That's the facts of life, the facts of life.

thetrinity · 12-14-21, 07:18 AM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

Not necessarily true. I have a lot of friends who are new at gambling.... and the low total made them take the over. Some people just don't look at stats between 2 teams. You set a total at like 35... people just take the OVER because it looks so low.

This is a good point. If you just look at their ppg the total should have been around 50 actually. They will always get into some shootouts yearly because a bad run defense will give up big plays against them and their own defense can’t stop any decent offense. The only way this will go over is special team help or short fields from turnovers. Just look at this site. Every post on a total is the over.

LT Profits · 12-14-21, 07:38 AM

Originally posted by thetrinity

There was 48 points in 10 and 11. You are saying those both went under? Someone else said it was 17 straight before the game. I was trying it look it up myself but I could only confirm 6 straight.

Yep. Total was 55. And it was 15-0 BEFORE last week (see below) so now 16-0 last 16.

Betting On

Home Team

Visitor Team

Home Score

Visitor Score

Event Date

Odds

Result

Units Won

Season

Visitor Team

Home Team

Over / Under

Season Type

Under

Army

Navy

15

0

12/12/2020

36

W

90.9

2020-21

Navy

Army

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

31

7

12/14/2019

41.5

W

92.6

2019-20

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Army

Navy

17

10

12/8/2018

38.5

W

86.2

2018-19

Navy

Army

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

13

14

12/9/2017

44

W

93.5

2017-18

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

17

21

12/10/2016

47.5

W

93.5

2016-17

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

21

17

12/12/2015

51

W

94.3

2015-16

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

17

10

12/13/2014

55.5

W

100

2014-15

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

34

7

12/14/2013

49.5

W

104

2013-14

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Army

Navy

13

17

12/8/2012

55.5

W

95.2

2012-13

Navy

Army

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

27

21

12/10/2011

55

W

97.1

2011-12

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Army

Navy

17

31

12/11/2010

52

W

90.9

2010-11

Navy

Army

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

17

3

12/12/2009

41.5

W

95.2

2009-10

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Army

Navy

0

34

12/6/2008

43

W

89.3

2008-09

Navy

Army

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

38

3

12/1/2007

64

W

95.2

2007-08

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

Under

Navy

Army

26

14

12/2/2006

50

W

92.6

2006-07

Army

Navy

Under

Regular

LT Profits · 12-14-21, 07:43 AM

Should have included 2005 went Over at 42-23 with Total 50, so streak did indeed start in 2006

LT Profits · 12-14-21, 07:44 AM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

Not necessarily true. I have a lot of friends who are new at gambling.... and the low total made them take the over. Some people just don't look at stats between 2 teams. You set a total at like 35... people just take the OVER because it looks so low.

But this streak was so highly publicized before the game it was practically impossible to escape it.

thetrinity · 12-14-21, 08:01 AM

Originally posted by LT Profits

But this streak was so highly publicized before the game it was practically impossible to escape it.

This is also a good point. However, every USA site is always geared to points. Their same game parlays often only have one side of a bet based on scoring happening. Crookstool bets overs with some blonde bimbo and has the overs tournament. These sites are pushing players to where they want to go anyways. One of the pa books had a promo for points be scored on this very game, 2 dollars per point free play. You don’t think that pushes players to the over? Everything at USA books is geared to scoring, much more than the offshores ever did.

flyingillini · 12-14-21, 08:33 AM

Very weird