what are the odds they won't have a team in the finals. Last yr fla st defeated aub in a tight game but oklahoma (with the worst big game chocker head coach) beat alabama. If anyone else coaches that team; okla wins by 3 tds. No more will you get a bye for a ring playing a tressel team. SEC has best coaches but has benefited by the espn love affair. in the next decade; i doubt they will win 3 rings. This could be my stroke speaking but it is just one fat mexican-p.r. opinion!
-
-
LSU and Florida were just better teams, don't make fun of Tressel.Comment -
States of Mississippi and Alabama have the best 4 teams in the country. Any less than 2 sec teams in the final 4 would be a travesty. Should be 2-3 forsure.Comment -
nobody wants to see SEC play SEC in the final 4. If they are truly the best conference than they need to walk through the best from the rest of the conferences on their way to a title...bottom line, rematches against conference opponents in the final 4 would be a joke bigger than the BCS. The SEC ISN'T the only conference that is afraid to schedule big time non conference games but they do just as much...well come the playoff, there's no hiding for any of these teams. Win the big bad SEC and walk your way to a title if it's really that easy out of conference.Comment -
tressel sucks. he got lucky that uc dropped 3 balls in the endzone. Plus there were alot of phantom fouls on uc during the game. I was there an also tevoed it and went back and watched it.Comment -
nobody knows who will get in
lol they all play each otherComment -
So you would rather see two sec teams who played each other once already rather than two teams who have never played each other in the past decade or decades. If oregon, tcu, mich st. all finish with at least 1 loss...I think the best final 4 would have 2 of them over a second sec team assuming you have fl state and the sec champ at the other 2.Comment
