I've seen quite a few posters tie their money up on a World Series bet at basically even odds.
The odds for Game 1 were virtually the same.
So if you wanted to place a SF series bet, why didn't you just take the Giants in Game 1 on the ML instead? That way, you either cash if they win and be done with it or double up at a much better price on the series "live" after the first game is over if they lose.
I see these types of wagers posted here all the time and I've never understood it. Doesn't make sense to make a series bet to me and tie your cash up when you have a much quicker alternative.
The odds for Game 1 were virtually the same.
So if you wanted to place a SF series bet, why didn't you just take the Giants in Game 1 on the ML instead? That way, you either cash if they win and be done with it or double up at a much better price on the series "live" after the first game is over if they lose.
I see these types of wagers posted here all the time and I've never understood it. Doesn't make sense to make a series bet to me and tie your cash up when you have a much quicker alternative.