Ok, so I'm always hearing talk of "yeah books will be out of business in 2 years" "ALERT ALERT SHARPS KILLING BOOKS!". With that said do you think books ever try to set a "fake trap" and bait the sharps into thinking they are playing a sharp play when really, in the eye's of the books, it's the square play? You follow?
What I'm saying (Syracuse is perfect example) Line is moving against Syracuse slightly yet we have 80% of the public slamming the line. Now, as a sharp player with a OH SO HUGE bankroll aren't you thinking damn look at that RLM maybe I should look into pounding ASU.....and the Sharp Hook 4000 has been sunken into your gums. Actually the play here is the "square play" in the eyes of the sharp player who's betting more...
Now I'm not trying to start another damn Cuse spread and I'm not saying to take Syracuse, it was just a good fit for the question since everyone's mind is on this game it seems.
So the question... Do books do this?
What I'm saying (Syracuse is perfect example) Line is moving against Syracuse slightly yet we have 80% of the public slamming the line. Now, as a sharp player with a OH SO HUGE bankroll aren't you thinking damn look at that RLM maybe I should look into pounding ASU.....and the Sharp Hook 4000 has been sunken into your gums. Actually the play here is the "square play" in the eyes of the sharp player who's betting more...
Now I'm not trying to start another damn Cuse spread and I'm not saying to take Syracuse, it was just a good fit for the question since everyone's mind is on this game it seems.
So the question... Do books do this?
