**packers +150 is an absolute gift

[Tully Mars 63]

Not I. This game nearly brought me back to even for the day. Fukking sports gambling... happy when I walk away down only a couple Benny's. Oh well, some days are diamonds... some days are rust. Tomorrows another day and thanks the 9'ers covering I'm still alive.

[k13]

So much fail in this thread. It would take to long to reply to all of it.

[tatddy]

So much fail in this thread. It would take to long to reply to all of it.

Cheers

[k13]

http://www.tmz.com/2012/09/14/ronnie-lott-aaron-rogers-49ers-jersey-alex-smith-bet-boyz-ii-men/

This is funny even if half true.

And since Aaron lost his bet with B2M -- and should have to wear an Alex Smith 49ers jersey -- Lott tells us the QB needs to pay up soon ... or else it could haunt him later in the season.

“I have a feeling it will bother him the next time he plays the Niners. If they meet again this season, it will bother him.”

Ronnie Lott = Sharp

Aaron Rodgers = Stiff

[freakydave]

SF certainly is the better team this year but GB had a good season.

[lakerboy]

Packer fans. Good season my ass. A good season in packerland is a superbowl or nothing.

[slacker00]

49ers dominated the series (13-3) until Lombardi showed up (3-13-1), then again (9-5) until Ron Wolf showed up in GB (1-13). Maybe this is a start of another cycle with Baalke/Harbaugh, they are 1-0 so far.

I'll go out on a limb and predict a decade of domination from these 49ers over the Packers. 2-0 with Harbaugh.

[Tully Mars 63]

Packer fans. Good season my ass. A good season in packerland is a superbowl or nothing.

I don't know if it's still true but about 6 yrs ago a friend of mine did a study on sport teams loses and domestic violence and the top three NFL cities/areas to see a rather dramatic increases in home violence was Green Bay, Dallas and Oakland.

[ChiLLx]

I don't know if it's still true but about 6 yrs ago a friend of mine did a study on sport teams loses and domestic violence and the top three NFL cities/areas to see a rather dramatic increases in home violence was Green Bay, Dallas and Oakland.

That's cuz GB is a dumb. Nothing there. All they have is their worship of "the Pack".

[slacker00]

I don't know if it's still true but about 6 yrs ago a friend of mine did a study on sport teams loses and domestic violence and the top three NFL cities/areas to see a rather dramatic increases in home violence was Green Bay, Dallas and Oakland.

I'd like to examine this study if it is available. I dispute that GB has a domestic violence problem. It's a tiny, sleepy town.

[daimoshokage]

MilwaukeeMike is a fukking joke.. A fukking loser play from the ass-wiper..

[PAULYPOKER]

Mike,


You all right buddy?

It has been 7 hours and 3 days since you took your posts away.......................

It was only a game bud.............

[Tully Mars 63]

I'd like to examine this study if it is available. I dispute that GB has a domestic violence problem. It's a tiny, sleepy town.

I don't have access to her study at the moment. I'll we if I can get a copy via e-mail later today. But for now here's this-

http://www.wiscnews.com/news/local/article_4691e998-40be-11e1-9583-0019bb2963f4.html

It's not just Green Bay fans breaking out the wife beater t-shirts either it's pretty much any national sport team fan. Her study focused on which cities showed the largest increase in domestic violence. I'll try to get her study. there was some section about violence increases in a couple cities that spanned gender meaning chicks and wives were beating the crap out of more of their partners after a loss at an increased rate as well.

[slacker00]

MilwaukeeMike is a fukking joke.. A fukking loser play from the ass-wiper..

Someone should track these GB homers, they were all fired up last week, now they are all gone, lol. Typical.

[slacker00]

I don't have access to her study at the moment. I'll we if I can get a copy via e-mail later today. But for now here's this-

http://www.wiscnews.com/news/local/article_4691e998-40be-11e1-9583-0019bb2963f4.html

It's not just Green Bay fans breaking out the wife beater t-shirts either it's pretty much any national sport team fan. Her study focused on which cities showed the largest increase in domestic violence. I'll try to get her study. there was some section about violence increases in a couple cities that spanned gender meaning chicks and wives were beating the crap out of more of their partners after a loss at an increased rate as well.

I wonder about violence after a team wins. I was on campus when a local football team won a big game and there was a riot.

[Sportsbetting123]

Packers ML was a good value play despite the loss.

[slacker00]

Packers ML was a good value play despite the loss.

Did you not watch that game? GB's defense looked lost out there, trying to guess where the ball was at.

[PAULYPOKER]

Packers ML was a good value play despite the loss.

Never did understand how a LOSER could have any value whatsoever

[rthoughton]

k13's avatar pic is perfect, only way 49ers win is by getting on their knees and praying for a miracle

love.

[rthoughton]

right. no value in a loser. ever. i dont understand that either. i'd rather hit a bet at -200 than lose five straight +Ev. you want value on a juicy winner?? risk more.

[bigblue74]

Never did understand how a LOSER could have any value whatsoever

right. no value in a loser. ever. i dont understand that either. i'd rather hit a bet at -200 than lose five straight +Ev. you want value on a juicy winner?? risk more.

billy walters better watch the fuk out cuz these sharp as blade foxes are the future of gamblin

[slacker00]

right. no value in a loser. ever. i dont understand that either. i'd rather hit a bet at -200 than lose five straight +Ev. you want value on a juicy winner?? risk more.

It wouldn't be so bad if GB got beat by a late TD or something, but if SF didn't spot GB 7 to start they were never in it.

[Tully Mars 63]

I wonder about violence after a team wins. I was on campus when a local football team won a big game and there was a riot.

No idea. Only studies I've looked at study the increase in domestic violence. That's completely different then violence in a riot.

I agree with your observation though. I was in LA at a hotel near the "Forum" when the Lakers beat the Celtics in the late 80's. I was attending a conference on something completely unrelated and just happened to be in the area. Not a fan of the Celtics and can't stand the Lakers. Some friends and I went to dinner and as we were leaving our waiter suggested we stay and have a couple drinks as the Lakers had just won the series and the streets were a little crazy. We looked out and there were people basically rioting. We had several drinks and left the bar on foot at nearly 2am. On our way back to our hotel we were stopped twice by cops on horseback and once by a patrol car. The only reason we didn't end up in jail was we weren't that toasted and we had hotels keys to show we were staying near by. The streets looked like WWIII just broke out.

I've never understood this... "my team just won the big game, think I'll torch this car to celebrate." But then I don't the "my team just lost the big game, honey get in here I want to beat the crap out of you" either.

[slacker00]

No idea. Only studies I've looked at study the increase in domestic violence. That's completely different then violence in a riot.

I agree with your observation though. I was in LA at a hotel near the "Forum" when the Lakers beat the Celtics in the late 80's. I was attending a conference on something completely unrelated and just happened to be in the area. Not a fan of the Celtics and can't stand the Lakers. Some friends and I went to dinner and as we were leaving our waiter suggested we stay and have a couple drinks as the Lakers had just won the series and the streets were a little crazy. We looked out and there were people basically rioting. We had several drinks and left the bar on foot at nearly 2am. On our way back to our hotel we were stopped twice by cops on horseback and once by a patrol car. The only reason we didn't end up in jail was we weren't that toasted and we had hotels keys to show we were staying near by. The streets looked like WWIII just broke out.

I've never understood this... "my team just won the big game, think I'll torch this car to celebrate." But then I don't the "my team just lost the big game, honey get in here I want to beat the crap out of you" either.

It's the hysteria of it all. People get all fired up and don't know what to do about it, so they lash out at whatever is there.

[meader99]

It wouldn't be so bad if GB got beat by a late TD or something, but if SF didn't spot GB 7 to start they were never in it.

Didn't GB give that 7 right back anyway on the fumbled punt inside the 10?

I might buy intop the study of Green Bay's domestic violence raises after a loss, BUT only because there are only 100,000 people in the city. One domestic abuse charge alone would have a much bigger impact in Green Bay than any other market ion the NFL.

[Tully Mars 63]

Didn't GB give that 7 right back anyway on the fumbled punt inside the 10?

I might buy intop the study of Green Bay's domestic violence raises after a loss, BUT only because there are only 100,000 people in the city. One domestic abuse charge alone would have a much bigger impact in Green Bay than any other market ion the NFL.

That just it this was done as a term paper for stat class. For the numbers to have any meaning what so ever they have to be calculated in terms of population. Same with murder or other crime rates when the FBI releases their annual report you'll always see the number given in terms like 4 per every 100k residents. That how you end up with things like Dallas, which is a much large urban area came in 2nd and Oakland, larger then GB as well was 3rd.

I sent this chick an e-mail this morning. Haven't heard back but her and her husband have visited twice since I moved to Mexico I'm sure I'll hear from her at some point.

[Slimpickens]

Packers ML was a good value play despite the loss.

Packers ML was one of the biggest suckers bets that I have ever seen in well over a decade of sports betting.

[slacker00]

Didn't GB give that 7 right back anyway on the fumbled punt inside the 10?

Right. GB gave up the 20 yd TD to Kap, then GB gave up the muffed punt, then a TD to Crabtree, then another TD to Crabtree, then a FG to end 1H, then a Rodgers INT to start 2H, then a 56 yard run TD by Kap, Gore TD, Dixon TD. Packers gave SF 579 yards and 45 points.

[PAULYPOKER]

It wouldn't be so bad if GB got beat by a late TD or something, but if SF didn't spot GB 7 to start they were never in it.

A loser is a loser no matter how you slice it up pal,the value bet /close but no cigar is nothing but a self coping tool to accept and live with failure.............

[meader99]

Right. GB gave up the 20 yd TD to Kap, then GB gave up the muffed punt, then a TD to Crabtree, then another TD to Crabtree, then a FG to end 1H, then a Rodgers INT to start 2H, then a 56 yard run TD by Kap, Gore TD, Dixon TD. Packers gave SF 579 yards and 45 points.

Yeah, I watched the game and the stats suggest they should have won by a lot more. People forget this game was 24-24 over half way through the 3rd quarter, but as you say it wouldn't have even been close if they didn't spot Green Bay 7. Looks to me like each team "spotted" the other 7.

[slacker00]

Yeah, I watched the game and the stats suggest they should have won by a lot more. People forget this game was 24-24 over half way through the 3rd quarter, but as you say it wouldn't have even been close if they didn't spot Green Bay 7. Looks to me like each team "spotted" the other 7.

Lets just say SF spotted GB 24 and GB spotted SF 45. Then SF gave GB a mercy TD with 1 min left.