FULL VIDEO BELOW:
Basically he thinks this will be like the 80's (and part of the 90's) where the FAR more complete and tough NFC teams dominated the pass oriented AFC teams that had poor running games, little pass rush, and poor pass (and run) defenses (as the Pats have)..
And he implies that the fact the Pats don't have any true deep threats, they won't even be as good as those AFC teams in the 80's who at least had some deep threats. He said that's why tight ends in the middle of the field is such a big part of the Patsies game, because they don't have anyone to go deep.
And thinks this will only make NY's job easier, making the Pats easier for them to defend as the pats don't have that dimension of a deep passing game.
I have to say though, that NE no-huddle offense when they go to it is deadly. I wonder if they employ that today as they may need to go through bags of tricks.
I grew up watching those games and super bowls in the 80's and 90's.. your thoughts to what he said??
Basically he thinks this will be like the 80's (and part of the 90's) where the FAR more complete and tough NFC teams dominated the pass oriented AFC teams that had poor running games, little pass rush, and poor pass (and run) defenses (as the Pats have)..
And he implies that the fact the Pats don't have any true deep threats, they won't even be as good as those AFC teams in the 80's who at least had some deep threats. He said that's why tight ends in the middle of the field is such a big part of the Patsies game, because they don't have anyone to go deep.
And thinks this will only make NY's job easier, making the Pats easier for them to defend as the pats don't have that dimension of a deep passing game.
I have to say though, that NE no-huddle offense when they go to it is deadly. I wonder if they employ that today as they may need to go through bags of tricks.
I grew up watching those games and super bowls in the 80's and 90's.. your thoughts to what he said??