1. #1
    DiggityDaggityDo
    DiggityDaggityDo's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-30-08
    Posts: 82,770
    Betpoints: 30698

    Panthers trade up to first overall pick

    Bears get two firsts, two seconds, D.J. Moore

  2. #2
    asiagambler
    asiagambler's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-23-17
    Posts: 6,372
    Betpoints: 30436

    WOW. Do they want Richardson ?

  3. #3
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by asiagambler View Post
    WOW. Do they want Richardson ?
    Would Carolina really need to trade up to #1 to take Richardson? Now they'll have a QB (maybe) and they lose their best receiver a bunch of picks. They will regret. Great haul for the Bears.

    I would assume they are taking Young.

  4. #4
    asiagambler
    asiagambler's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-23-17
    Posts: 6,372
    Betpoints: 30436

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    Would Carolina really need to trade up to #1 to take Richardson? Now they'll have a QB (maybe) and they lose their best receiver a bunch of picks. They will regret. Great haul for the Bears.

    I would assume they are taking Young.
    I haven't really been following but... I'm pretty sure they want Richardson. Crazy how much they gave up... just a massive haul for Chicago

  5. #5
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by asiagambler View Post
    I haven't really been following but... I'm pretty sure they want Richardson. Crazy how much they gave up... just a massive haul for Chicago
    Yeah, and a rookie QB without receivers...Carolina will likely be bottom-feeders. That first rounder next year will probably be top 5.

  6. #6
    asiagambler
    asiagambler's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-23-17
    Posts: 6,372
    Betpoints: 30436

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    Yeah, and a rookie QB without receivers...Carolina will likely be bottom-feeders. That first rounder next year will probably be top 5.
    I think I remember hearing Bears' asking price was 3 first rounders and... I think this is even better. Moore is a legitimate WR1, still young and 3 years remaining on a very reasonable deal

    That Texans' 2 point conversion made this all possible

  7. #7
    TheGoldenGoose
    TheGoldenGoose's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-27-12
    Posts: 3,606
    Betpoints: 3621

    da Bears. Nice haul.

  8. #8
    GunShard
    Invest In Ethereum And Bitcoin
    GunShard's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-05-10
    Posts: 9,983
    Betpoints: 1920

    Panthers skipped on Kenny Pickett in last years draft. Interesting they did it now.

  9. #9
    Mike78
    Mike78's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-16-20
    Posts: 90
    Betpoints: 3937

    Draft props have been taken down at all my books, so I can't verify this. But VSIN just said that Stroud has moved from +200 to -200 as being the first pick. Young has gone from -250 or so to plus money.

  10. #10
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    I read in The Athletic last month that Fields was bitching a moaning about how the winter Chicago weather is not conducive to his style of play (or something to that effect)

    Personally speaking, I don't want players like that.
    Adjust and adapt or STFU is what I say, but then again I say a lot of things.

    You know who could play in brutal winter weather?
    Guys like Terry Bradshaw, Favre, Big Ben, Aaron Rodger, Eli, Josh Allen, Jim Kelly, Mahomes, and that Brady fella.
    Seems to me they adapted and adjusted.

    The long list of Bears QB failures continues.
    Amazing how they've never had a great QB, no less a good one.
    Bears defense carried Jim McMahon who was mediocre at best, Jay Cutler was not.

    Think about it, name a noteworthy Bears QB that was really good not named Sid Luckman, win valuable prizes.

  11. #11
    GunShard
    Invest In Ethereum And Bitcoin
    GunShard's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-05-10
    Posts: 9,983
    Betpoints: 1920

    The Bears had a chance to draft Patrick Mahomes. They missed out on an elite quarterback.

  12. #12
    jackpot269
    jackpot269's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-24-07
    Posts: 11,495
    Betpoints: 8377

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    I read in The Athletic last month that Fields was bitching a moaning about how the winter Chicago weather is not conducive to his style of play (or something to that effect)

    Personally speaking, I don't want players like that.
    Adjust and adapt or STFU is what I say, but then again I say a lot of things.

    You know who could play in brutal winter weather?
    Guys like Terry Bradshaw, Favre, Big Ben, Aaron Rodger, Eli, Josh Allen, Jim Kelly, Mahomes, and that Brady fella.
    Seems to me they adapted and adjusted.

    The long list of Bears QB failures continues.
    Amazing how they've never had a great QB, no less a good one.
    Bears defense carried Jim McMahon who was mediocre at best, Jay Cutler was not.

    Think about it, name a noteworthy Bears QB that was really good not named Sid Luckman, win valuable prizes.
    1. Sid Luckman, 1939-1950

    2. Jay Cutler, 2009-2016

    3. Jim McMahon, 1982-1988

    4. Jim Harbaugh, 1987-1993

    5. Erik Kramer, 1994-1998


  13. #13
    ex50warrior
    ex50warrior's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 10-10-09
    Posts: 3,731
    Betpoints: 25064

    Quote Originally Posted by asiagambler View Post
    I think I remember hearing Bears' asking price was 3 first rounders and... I think this is even better. Moore is a legitimate WR1, still young and 3 years remaining on a very reasonable deal

    That Texans' 2 point conversion made this all possible
    Yep, that could be the Texans raking in that haul.

  14. #14
    Easy-Rider 66
    Easy-Rider 66's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-14-12
    Posts: 33,186
    Betpoints: 3353

    Quote Originally Posted by asiagambler View Post
    WOW. Do they want Richardson ?
    NO way Car takes Richardson IMO. too Risky. Thinking either Young or Stroud.

  15. #15
    Otters27
    Otters27's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-14-07
    Posts: 30,688
    Betpoints: 410

    Quote Originally Posted by GunShard View Post
    The Bears had a chance to draft Patrick Mahomes. They missed out on an elite quarterback.
    Andy helped make mahomes. Letting him be more like a point guard.

    I think McDaniel would kill it with Mahomes

  16. #16
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by Easy-Rider 66 View Post
    NO way Car takes Richardson IMO. too Risky. Thinking either Young or Stroud.
    Word is they like Stroud.

    I guess they figured that Young and Stroud would go top 2 and Houston wasn't going to trade the pick, so if they wanted him they had to move to 1.

  17. #17
    Easy-Rider 66
    Easy-Rider 66's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-14-12
    Posts: 33,186
    Betpoints: 3353

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    Word is they like Stroud.

    I guess they figured that Young and Stroud would go top 2 and Houston wasn't going to trade the pick, so if they wanted him they had to move to 1.
    OK THX for the info.

  18. #18
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    The combine gurus that I pay attention to are pretty much saying not only is Stroud NFL ready right now, he's got the potential to be the next big thing one scout said, I'm reading he's doing some eye popping things.

    I'm not sure Eberflus is the correct head coach for Stroud though.
    Eberflus is a defensive minded coach, he was linebacker for those good Toledo teams in the MAAC in the 90's.
    Bears need offense, defense doesn't win anymore like the 1985 Bears and the 1986 Giants.


    Look around the league now, what's the common denominator?
    Teams with strong offensive minded head coaches are winning all the hardware these days.
    Coaches like Dabol for instance, look at what he did for Allen in Buffalo and Daniel Jones for the Giants, a big reason why many are saying (me included) the game has passed Bill Belichick by, Belichick still thinks ball control and defense still wins, it does not.

    Bears need an offense guru HC, not another defense specialist.

  19. #19
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 31,511
    Betpoints: 24869

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike78 View Post
    Draft props have been taken down at all my books, so I can't verify this. But VSIN just said that Stroud has moved from +200 to -200 as being the first pick. Young has gone from -250 or so to plus money.
    Very interesting:

    *Stroud played very well vs Georgia.
    *Will always be a question about Bryce Young's size. Alabama was very lacking in Big Plays this past year.
    Nomination(s):
    This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: GunShard

  20. #20
    manny24
    pay Bobby
    manny24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-22-07
    Posts: 20,088
    Betpoints: 649

    any Blowjob Taylor (UCF) projections ?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!?

  21. #21
    BOA12
    BOA12's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-12
    Posts: 19,377
    Betpoints: 2047

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    I read in The Athletic last month that Fields was bitching a moaning about how the winter Chicago weather is not conducive to his style of play (or something to that effect)

    Personally speaking, I don't want players like that.
    Adjust and adapt or STFU is what I say, but then again I say a lot of things.

    You know who could play in brutal winter weather?
    Guys like Terry Bradshaw, Favre, Big Ben, Aaron Rodger, Eli, Josh Allen, Jim Kelly, Mahomes, and that Brady fella.
    Seems to me they adapted and adjusted.

    The long list of Bears QB failures continues.
    Amazing how they've never had a great QB, no less a good one.
    Bears defense carried Jim McMahon who was mediocre at best, Jay Cutler was not.

    Think about it, name a noteworthy Bears QB that was really good not named Sid Luckman, win valuable prizes.
    The wrong team left Chicago. I'm not a big Fields fan. If memory serves me, they had a chance to draft Bradshaw. Bears QB "failures" would be considered an upgrade to me.

  22. #22
    BOA12
    BOA12's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-12
    Posts: 19,377
    Betpoints: 2047

    Quote Originally Posted by jackpot269 View Post
    1. Sid Luckman, 1939-1950

    2. Jay Cutler, 2009-2016


    3. Jim McMahon, 1982-1988

    4. Jim Harbaugh, 1987-1993

    5. Erik Kramer, 1994-1998
    My favorite was Kramer, wasn't born when Luckman played.

  23. #23
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 94,069
    Betpoints: 7696

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    I read in The Athletic last month that Fields was bitching a moaning about how the winter Chicago weather is not conducive to his style of play (or something to that effect)

    Personally speaking, I don't want players like that.
    Adjust and adapt or STFU is what I say, but then again I say a lot of things.

    You know who could play in brutal winter weather?
    Guys like Terry Bradshaw, Favre, Big Ben, Aaron Rodger, Eli, Josh Allen, Jim Kelly, Mahomes, and that Brady fella.
    Seems to me they adapted and adjusted.

    The long list of Bears QB failures continues.
    Amazing how they've never had a great QB, no less a good one.
    Bears defense carried Jim McMahon who was mediocre at best, Jay Cutler was not.

    Think about it, name a noteworthy Bears QB that was really good not named Sid Luckman, win valuable prizes.
    How dare you tell a man of color to STFU?

    I'm very offended.

  24. #24
    MoMoneyMoVaughn
    Down but not out
    MoMoneyMoVaughn's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-08-14
    Posts: 14,988
    Betpoints: 4547

    Panthers will take Stroud and he will struggle.

  25. #25
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    The combine gurus that I pay attention to are pretty much saying not only is Stroud NFL ready right now, he's got the potential to be the next big thing one scout said, I'm reading he's doing some eye popping things.

    I'm not sure Eberflus is the correct head coach for Stroud though.
    Eberflus is a defensive minded coach, he was linebacker for those good Toledo teams in the MAAC in the 90's.
    Bears need offense, defense doesn't win anymore like the 1985 Bears and the 1986 Giants.


    Look around the league now, what's the common denominator?
    Teams with strong offensive minded head coaches are winning all the hardware these days.
    Coaches like Dabol for instance, look at what he did for Allen in Buffalo and Daniel Jones for the Giants, a big reason why many are saying (me included) the game has passed Bill Belichick by, Belichick still thinks ball control and defense still wins, it does not.

    Bears need an offense guru HC, not another defense specialist.
    Carolina is going to draft Stroud, no the Bears. Regardless though, the HC doesn't necessarily matter that much for the QB. More about the OC.

  26. #26
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by MoMoneyMoVaughn View Post
    Panthers will take Stroud and he will struggle.
    Who is he going to throw the ball to now that they traded their best WR?

    I think Stroud will eventually be good, but Carolina won't be good next season. And they really made it tough trading away all those picks.

  27. #27
    asiagambler
    asiagambler's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-23-17
    Posts: 6,372
    Betpoints: 30436

    Quote Originally Posted by Easy-Rider 66 View Post
    NO way Car takes Richardson IMO. too Risky. Thinking either Young or Stroud.
    I think it's a smokescreen. They want another Cam Newton

    This might just be a way to find out who really wants Stroud and they can re-trade the pick

    Young, I don't think is in the picture at all. It'd be either Richardson or Stroud

  28. #28
    Covering the #
    Covering the #'s Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-17
    Posts: 846
    Betpoints: 4205

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    Who is he going to throw the ball to now that they traded their best WR?

    I think Stroud will eventually be good, but Carolina won't be good next season. And they really made it tough trading away all those picks.
    I already said this awhile back, but when the Panthers hired Frank Reich, it looked like an intention to tank a few more years. Not sure the direction of their franchise, but nobody in their division is going to win a playoff game anytime soon. I'm going to guess Carolina isn't interested in winning for the next few years until they get more pieces in place, which will be 3 years minimum. Reich will be replaced by then.

  29. #29
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by Covering the # View Post
    I already said this awhile back, but when the Panthers hired Frank Reich, it looked like an intention to tank a few more years. Not sure the direction of their franchise, but nobody in their division is going to win a playoff game anytime soon. I'm going to guess Carolina isn't interested in winning for the next few years until they get more pieces in place, which will be 3 years minimum. Reich will be replaced by then.
    If that was the case then why in the hell would they trade their 2024 #1 and 2025 #2? That doesn't mesh.

  30. #30
    JIBBBY
    JIBBBY's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-10-09
    Posts: 83,073
    Betpoints: 11862

    Panthers suck. Cam Newton sucked with that experiment. Their coaching and drafting players suck. Be shocked if they make the playoffs next year.

  31. #31
    Covering the #
    Covering the #'s Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-17
    Posts: 846
    Betpoints: 4205

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    If that was the case then why in the hell would they trade their 2024 #1 and 2025 #2? That doesn't mesh.
    I'm guessing whoever they draft this year would be their QB of the future, but won't play him much this year and let Darnold or whoever lead this offensive challenged team to the cellar for the next year or two. They don't want to win next couple of years so missing those high draft picks next couple years is probably part of the plan to ensure it.

  32. #32
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21665

    Quote Originally Posted by Covering the # View Post
    I'm guessing whoever they draft this year would be their QB of the future, but won't play him much this year and let Darnold or whoever lead this offensive challenged team to the cellar for the next year or two. They don't want to win next couple of years so missing those high draft picks next couple years is probably part of the plan to ensure it.
    That's a weird ass "plan".

  33. #33
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 31,511
    Betpoints: 24869

    Quote Originally Posted by Covering the # View Post
    I'm guessing whoever they draft this year would be their QB of the future, but won't play him much this year and let Darnold or whoever lead this offensive challenged team to the cellar for the next year or two. They don't want to win next couple of years so missing those high draft picks next couple years is probably part of the plan to ensure it.
    I think you could be on to something here. Never know about these decisions:

    *Why not just keep Wilks?

    It's crazy to me. Team showed more life under the interim coach. If the players respect him, just keep Wilks.

    If they had kept Wilks, they could easily dispose of him if they have a bad season. Is Stroud that much of a prospect to make this deal? Wonder where this trade rates on the old Jimmy Johnson conversion chart.

  34. #34
    Covering the #
    Covering the #'s Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-17
    Posts: 846
    Betpoints: 4205

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    That's a weird ass "plan".
    It probably is, but why else did they trade McCaffrey and Moore and hire Reich? That tells you all you need to know for the next few years.

  35. #35
    Covering the #
    Covering the #'s Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-17
    Posts: 846
    Betpoints: 4205

    Quote Originally Posted by ChuckyTheGoat View Post
    I think you could be on to something here. Never know about these decisions:

    *Why not just keep Wilks?

    It's crazy to me. Team showed more life under the interim coach. If the players respect him, just keep Wilks.

    If they had kept Wilks, they could easily dispose of him if they have a bad season. Is Stroud that much of a prospect to make this deal? Wonder where this trade rates on the old Jimmy Johnson conversion chart.
    I agree they should have kept Wilks, but as I've tried to convey, they don't want to win the next few years.

12 Last
Top