NFL 74-53-4 +35.31u
Oakland +4 -110 x2.2u
seahawks TT o25.5 -110 x2.2u
Oakland +4 -110 x2.2u
seahawks TT o25.5 -110 x2.2u
-
-
I guess you are assuming that the Oakland-Houston game will be low scoring. Do you think it will go under 36? Remember they play in a Domed Stadium so the weather will not be a factor.
As far as the Seattle team total goes, that is a rather gutsy play IMO. They have been held under 25.5 in half of their games. They averaged about 22.5 ppg and the Detroit defense averaged giving up about 22.4 ppg. I think this may be a lower scoring game than many think. With the crappy weather we have been having along the west coast, rain may be a factor. It will be cold, even for Seattle standards.Last edited by BigdaddyQH; 01-05-17, 06:06 PM.Comment -
dont try and guess my reasoning behind my picks and be that far off QH... i know you're much smarter than that. my style of picking is unprecedented & unique so i cant really blame your terrible assumption.. i actually think it goes over. 21-17 or 23-19. somewhere in there.. connor should be able to make some timely throws.. move the ball/chains.. get in the endzone a couple times or so to make things interesting.
the weather will not be that big of an issue.. russell plays in these conditions all the time. the way detroit plays, they are going to force seattle to play up tempo.. & seattle at home in a playoff game?.. cmon QH. i would be really surprised if seahawks score anything under 28 points here..Last edited by JayDr3am; 01-05-17, 07:38 PM.Comment -
wildcard addition:
Greenbay/giants u44.5 -110 x2.2uComment -
Jay i know you dont post parlays but this is the wild card game..if you have anything in mind lmk..ill just play a small bet in for fun..thanks bro..do you think my NYG stand a chance against the redhott packers??? Giants playing well so far i really hope they win SU ..love your under for that game also..BOL my brother. .cheers!!!Comment -
this is the perfect time for a teaser! im actually toying with 10pt teasers as we speak but havent made anything official yet. if i come up with something ill let you guys know.
i was leaning giants but im staying away from the spread in that game.. i think the giants defense slows down greenbay though.. 23-16 type of game.Comment -
Both Crabtree and Cooper have been limited in practice all week, meaning that I still think we see timing issues between Cook and them. Raiders already top 3 in the league in drops, now you have a rookie QB who you don't have any chemistry with. I think there will be some struggles in the passing game.
Texans switched up to a no huddle offense last week and got a ton of targets to Hopkins, Brock looked much more comfortable running the no huddle.
Give me the team that's 7-1 at home with one of the best defensive units in the league. AJ Bouye is the most underrated corner in the league, he will have his national TV breakout this offseason.Comment -
post-season not offseason*Comment -
it is very joe to fade the rookie making his NFL start in the playoffs.. only the contrarian guys will see where im going with this.. and im not saying being a joe is bad or anything you just have to know when to turn it on and off.
but by me getting +4 in this game, im simply getting the better half of the wishbone. texans rarely get in the endzone, (which is basically 7pts if they make the XP). texans are ranked 30th in the redzone in scoring. oakland is ranked 14th. texans dont score alot of touchdowns to begin with and im getting 60% of a full score. me personally, if im getting more than 50% on anything i like my position. period. lol thats with anything really.. business deals, commission, things on sale during christmas lol ill take it!
could i be an idiot for backing a rookie quarterback making his first start ever in a wildcard game? yes. but del rio has gambled all season and im sure he has something up his sleeve.Comment -
if oakland can run the pigskin and atleast get in field goal range & put janikowski in a position to be successful i see oakland putting the pressure on the spread making it difficult for the cover. Houston could very well win this game, but it wont be by 5 pts. it just wont be.Comment -
I misread your post. I also agree on Seattle going over, but the Raider wager was just pure duh...Comment -
-
-
Jay you must have good memory
Comment -
NFL 75-54-4 +35.11u
Greenbay/giants u44.5 x2.2u *pending
Wildcard addition:
steeler -12 -110Last edited by JayDr3am; 01-07-17, 11:38 PM.Comment -
if you took the seattle TT pick the day i did, you beat the line by a half point.
small vig loss today. i see the steelers blowing the doors off of miami.. pitts defense has tightened up.. Bell ben & brown should have big games. last time when miami beat them tannehill was at the helm.. i dont expect matt more to keep up with ben in a shootout AT HOME.. just dont see it. 30-14 pittComment -
wildcard addition:
Steelers tt o28.5 -115Comment -
-
yeah yeah yeah.. texans were lucky to win by 13.. they played well and very well should have won but oakland still had chances to make things interesting and possibly cover ATS if the oakland receivers didnt drop 20 balls.. for him to be a rookie the game was still in reach..Comment -
-
Air bettor. Nobody in the history of gambling has ever bet 10 times their normal bet just because it was the playoffs and bowl season. You were getting crushed in bowls and all of a sudden risking 10x the normal bet chasing it. You don't gamble . Any retard on here that thinks you do is a joke like you. I have already proven all of this. How soon we forget.Comment -
i dont have to cheat you fu*kin moron i swear i will send your fat british ass 400 euros right now to never post on here ever again. seriously. where are you from? london? newcastle? sunderland? i will send it right now i promise. why are you even awake right now?? stupid wankah got his knickers in a bunch. i think its hilarious you thought it would cool to comment in my thread all nonchalant. stay out of here pu**yLast edited by JayDr3am; 01-08-17, 12:57 AM.Comment -
"nobody in the history of gambling".. you are so stupid. what history do you know?? who's keeping the records of what "real gamblers" do?? if you have a book or notes you have taken please send them to me. cause i want to read it. you sound so fuc*in stupid right now i would slap the dog piss out of you. "the history of gambling" 
you're 100% right i was getting crushed in bowl season so i began to chase... and cashed. BIG. its okay man i understand your hate and malicious behavior trust me.. i would be pissed too if i didnt have a dime to my name and didnt make a pick all season cause the sportsbooks doesnt accept coupons.Last edited by JayDr3am; 01-08-17, 01:24 AM.Comment -
i am so serious. and when you receive the euros i want you to post the euros and make that your last post here ever again you fat british wasteComment -
please tell me what a "real gambler" is? im staying awake just to see this. i cant wait.Last edited by shari91; 01-09-17, 05:33 PM.Comment -
If you don't have to cheat, why have I caught you cheating almost every time you post??
What is a real gambler??? Real gamblers know how to calculate simple W/L and unit totals. You don't. Real gamblers don't have time to post every thought, lean and pick on a forum. Real gamblers know what simple gambling terms mean, like backdoor cover. You don't. Real gamblers don't tell everyone how great they are every other sentence. Real gamblers don't chase losses. They NEVER bet 10x their normal amount on ANY bet. Only air bettors do that. Real gamblers don't post fake lines that were never available like you do.
Just a few things. Also, real gamblers don't get defensive when questioned because their life worth isn't based on some phony betting record on a forum. You are the most obvious fake to ever be on a forum, and that is saying something.
Finally, all of your defensive, retarded comeback posts contain homosexual acts. Gee, I wonder why.....lolLast edited by shari91; 01-09-17, 05:38 PM.Comment
