Carolina is good but look at their schedule

[ShowMeDaMoney]

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=panthers+schedule+2015

3 point wins over the Saints, Giants, and Colts...and lost to the Falcons.

What would this teams record have been if they played Denver's schedule?

Don't get me wrong they're a great team but they are beatable.

[WildCelticsFan]

Denver also hasn't faced dual threat QB this year.

[Git Lo]

Okay now post a write up about their wins.. include the playoffs as well

[ShowMeDaMoney]

Okay now post a write up about their wins.. include the playoffs as well

every AFC playoff team would have handled Arizona with ease that night. Palmer might as well have been wearing a Panthers jersey.

They beat a good Seattle team but they were held to zero points in the second half. They're a great team some pretty average teams played they tight during the regular season, and if Seattle's D can contain them...I would think Denver's has a shot too.

[Git Lo]

Ill give you that. Im mainly fading PM inability to manage the game against a solid Panthers defense. Notable wins is when they trashed the Cowboys on thanksgiving, injuring Romo who had just returned. 44-16 against the redskins, beat GB by 8. Most wins aren't more than a touchdown but they went 15-1, that in itself is very hard to do, and without their #1 receiver.

[ShowMeDaMoney]

Valid points for sure. For me +6 is a no brainer and I think the Broncos have a really good shot at winning the game if PM doesn't shoot himself in the foot.

[MarcusPaige]

Panthers tendency was to blow teams out of the stadium then let them come back. Final scores don't always tell the whole story. Are you seriously suggesting that not scoring in the second half against Seattlle when they led 31-0 really means anything?

[ShowMeDaMoney]

Panthers tendency was to blow teams out of the stadium then let them come back. Final scores don't always tell the whole story. Are you seriously suggesting that not scoring in the second half against Seattlle when they led 31-0 really means anything?

How does it not mean anything that Seattle was able to make adjustments, hold them to zero points in the second half, and put themselves in position to send the game into OT despite being down 31-0 at the half? Are you suggesting Carolina was not trying on either side of the ball in the second half?

[MarcusPaige]

How does it not mean anything that Seattle was able to make adjustments, hold them to zero points in the second half, and put themselves in position to send the game into OT despite being down 31-0 at the half? Are you suggesting Carolina was not trying on either side of the ball in the second half?

Yeah they were trying. Trying to run clock and make it impossible for Seattle to win.

Trying to play as conservative as possible and not turn the ball over, which is the only possible way Seattle could come back.

Trying to get out of the game without revealing any more of their playbook.

Trying to let Seattle have as many short plays in the middle of the field as they wanted.

If you think that second half means anything, you just started watching football.

[KnownUnknown]

Yeah they were trying. Trying to run clock and make it impossible for Seattle to win.

Trying to play as conservative as possible and not turn the ball over, which is the only possible way Seattle could come back.

Trying to get out of the game without revealing any more of their playbook.

Trying to let Seattle have as many short plays in the middle of the field as they wanted.

If you think that second half means anything, you just started watching football.

Simply stated- Seattle was not anywhere near as strong as they had been the previous two seasons. Would you agree or disagree with this statement? Word to the wise- don't take too much away from beating a lessor team (imo).

[rkelly110]

Yeah they were trying. Trying to run clock and make it impossible for Seattle to win.

Trying to play as conservative as possible and not turn the ball over, which is the only possible way Seattle could come back.

Trying to get out of the game without revealing any more of their playbook.

Trying to let Seattle have as many short plays in the middle of the field as they wanted.

If you think that second half means anything, you just started watching football.

Marcus has a clue.

Looks like Carolina gets everything done in the 1st half then takes a break the 2nd.

Let's see if Denver has caught on to their shenanigans.

[Bigh2001]

every AFC playoff team would have handled Arizona with ease that night. Palmer might as well have been wearing a Panthers jersey.

They beat a good Seattle team but they were held to zero points in the second half. They're a great team some pretty average teams played they tight during the regular season, and if Seattle's D can contain them...I would think Denver's has a shot too.

why are people still saying stuff like this? it just makes you sound stupid. please re-read what you have written.

[Git Lo]

Marcus has a clue.

Looks like Carolina gets everything done in the 1st half then takes a break the 2nd.

Let's see if Denver has caught on to their shenanigans.

This is the last game of the season, it probably wont happen again assuming thats correct

[ShowMeDaMoney]

another unbeatable team has been beat int he Super Bowl

[chaka]

Carlina defense played awesome. Denvers d made a few key turnovers deep in carolina territory
carolina needs rb, wr help but keep that d together they will be tough

cam needs to stop pouting though