Need A Good Teaser? Check In Here!

Totolover1409 · 10-10-15, 11:54 PM

IMO, the only ones thats can screw you here are the Jags or the Giants.

2Shirts · 10-11-15, 12:04 AM

everything looks good until the games start and reality sets in. Would agree that it looks strong though - may tail since I made a ton of $ in college ball.

The J-Dizzle · 10-11-15, 03:21 AM

I don't generally like going over the ML on teaser, like you did on Cards.
I'm on Cards-2.5 myself but if they lose, chances are they lose by more than 3. Would rather go with Kansas-3.

WildCelticsFan · 10-11-15, 03:30 AM

Originally posted by The J-Dizzle

I don't generally like going over the ML on teaser, like you did on Cards.
I'm on Cards-2.5 myself but if they lose, chances are they lose by more than 3. Would rather go with Kansas-3.

I normally don't either...but I just like them so much in this spot. Wierd thing is I'm worried about Pats.

slacker00 · 10-11-15, 04:02 AM

I'm going the opposite way on most of these, I made a "fade parlay" for fun just to see what it would look like:

WagerType:PARLAY (7 TEAMS)
Date:	Team:
Oct 11	NFL [452] TAMPA BAY -3EV
Oct 11	NFL [462] PHILADELPHIA -275
Oct 11	NFL [463] ST. LOUIS +365
Oct 11	NFL [466] CINCINNATI -3-110
Oct 11	NFL [468] DETROIT +3EV
Oct 11	NFL [470] DALLAS +9-115
Oct 11	NFL [473] SAN FRANCISCO +6½-105
Risking 5 SBR To Win 878.72 SBR

LittleLarryY · 10-11-15, 07:13 AM

Originally posted by The J-Dizzle

I don't generally like going over the ML on teaser, like you did on Cards.
I'm on Cards-2.5 myself but if they lose, chances are they lose by more than 3. Would rather go with Kansas-3.

Just asking here. What is the logic on this? Couldn't it be viewed as a stronger play used to increase the odds of the teaser?

Thanks and good luck.

thebestthereis · 10-11-15, 07:25 AM

Originally posted by LittleLarryY

Just asking here. What is the logic on this? Couldn't it be viewed as a stronger play used to increase the odds of the teaser?

Thanks and good luck.

Crossing through zero on a teaser like taking the Cardinals vs the Lions doesn't make mathematical sense. Lions +8.5 would be a better bet.

The J-Dizzle · 10-11-15, 07:27 AM

Just personal preference I guess. Normally I use teams with a higher spread (like Kansas and pats this week) when I'm pretty confident they will win but perhaps not cover that high spread. I've played Cards as a single but if they lose the game, chances are it will be with more than 3 points. I rather drop big favorites mot high spreads down to ML och use big underdogs who I like and put some extra points on them(like Minnesota last week).

If the teams screws up, I can still get a backdoor cover on a Minnesota+13, but it's hard to win if Arizona screws up with only +3. Capish?

LittleLarryY · 10-11-15, 07:55 AM

Yeah. I see what you guys are saying. I just have a hard time convincing my brain that making the chalk stronger is not necessarily the best play.

Thanks for the insight.

Lazy-Man · 10-11-15, 09:14 AM

I can guarantee you this teaser won't hit. One of these will fall today.

WildCelticsFan · 10-11-15, 02:18 PM

Yepp saints screwing me..