Packers -9.5 +116 vs. Vikings

[Big Bear]

juice or no juice a winner is a winner

[PAULYPOKER]

104 Green Bay Packers* -12 +149 vs Minnesota Vikings

[mnwild11]

whatever you think BB. Tomorrow night we will tell...lame of GB to halt the booze. Whats the point of going to the game then???

[Richards]

Sometimes I wonder if teams should even cover MN receivers 20 yards + beyond the LOS. Ponder throws floating ducks at that range. He's mobile, and fairly accurate (sometimes) at short range.

Last week Packers seemed to treat that game like a business trip, and Tramon Williams was making business decisions, instead of tackles,
and the linebackers had a particularly bad day. Viking's played their hearts out, at home, and it was a close contest.

C. Woodson cleared to play this week. He'll be rusty, but he's the best run-defending guy in the Packer secondary. That will help, because other than Morgan Burnett, the rest of the packer 2nd level are soft against the run.

[brewcrew2k]

Bovada is still giving the Vikings +9(-130) packers at +110.

[Pick'nParlays]

Passing boys

[2daBank]

HUNGRY ?? MOTIVATED???? yea,ok.GB is wishy washy,not consistant!!The line should be no bigger than 3-4 points!! Vikings +7.5-10=,Packer Supa Bowl days are behind them.They wont do nuttin,real fast!!

well here the answer,,,gb is obviously the play if this clown likes minny....

[Beetlejuice]

Fack it. Vikings cover the spread.

[k13]

[Speedy88]

Pack -9 was probably the easiest play we'll see during these playoffs. Wish I went bigger.

[lunchbawks]

vegas must have known something about ponder

[mnwild11]

touche. let the heart get invloved with the betting, always a bad idea

[PAULYPOKER]

104 Green Bay Packers* -12 +149 vs Minnesota Vikings

Bang!!!

[meader99]

vegas must have known something about ponder

Ponder was not going to make the difference in the outcome..... Packers were winnng by 10+ regardless.