RochesterTitans thread of NBA+NCAA winners w/ ratings 96-48 on season

[thechaoz]

Let's go get it bud...trailing on your picks....see ya on tonight

[lasker]

Any Americans have trouble with payouts on Bodog or Bookmaker? I haven't tried yet, but I was just wondering if they make it a hassle since sports betting isn't exactly legal in this country

[jspectyper]

Bodogs pretty good about payouts. Check usually comes within a week.

[lasker]

Thanks

[NYsportsfreak]

bodog probably has the best payouts..awful lines tho

[NYsportsfreak]

A ton of games tomorrow!! ROCH to get your plays, how often should I check back? Seems crazy to check every hour?? Does anyone else know ROCH's schedule for posting plays on weekends? Thanks!

he may have about 40 plays tomorrow ok may a little exaggeration but i'd say expect 15-20

[SolidDala]

Bodogs pretty good about payouts. Check usually comes within a week.

Using NETELLER for my withdraws then from them direct to my bank, easy peachy. Never have and never will use checks

[chickenwang]

I'm gonna have to say Over for Montana/ Port St. Last game went over this amount, and Port St. has been putting up some points lately.

I think you miss this one just like the Michigan game last night

[sokrboyz]

Good luck roch

[NOREGRETS]

NYsportsfreak - Thanks for the information. So do you just check back periodically?

Chickenwang - How about you take the over and I will take the under (Montana game) and we will see who wins. Wanna bet that I win

[The Oddsbreaker]

I'm gonna have to say Over for Montana/ Port St. Last game went over this amount, and Port St. has been putting up some points lately.

I think you miss this one just like the Michigan game last night

This is just my opinion so take it for what it's worth. Just something to consider -

The guy is 67% over 330 games. Trying to go thru and pick games you think he's got wrong will only hurt you. All of his plays must be tailed or you don't tail any. Picking and choosing which games to play will just lower your overall winning percentage. No one on this site is 67% with their picks so you're automatically working with a system that is producing less than his system. Why would you want to meld a weaker system in with the best system? You'll only end up with a watered down version of the best system.

[NOREGRETS]

Very, very well put.

[trevlyn1983]

I cashed out on Bookmaker 2 times and got a check the next day both times

[NYsportsfreak]

This is just my opinion so take it for what it's worth. Just something to consider - The guy is 67% over 330 games. Trying to go thru and pick games you think he's got wrong will only hurt you. All of his plays must be tailed or you don't tail any. Picking and choosing which games to play will just lower your overall winning percentage. No one on this site is 67% with their picks so you're automatically working with a system that is producing less than his system. Why would you want to meld a weaker system in with the best system? You'll only end up with a watered down version of the best system.

people in general should just keep their leans to themselves except RT of course....start your own thread if you wanna go against the man!

[Morrisbettor]

8-3 pretty good night from the Rochtradomas

I thought you liked the over in the Gonzaga game too? Or was that not an official play?

[asch04]

Not official....it was second half and someone was just asking for his input. He picked zags and over so it was a split.

[Morrisbettor]

Oh ok, thanks

[AceofSP2107]

does anyone like cornell to crush penn by like 25

[Axis]

I'm not hating, only trying to see where you're coming from on those to unders, because I got over on the Montana (barely) and a super high over on Columbia/Princeton.

I don't bet over/unders often, but I have a pretty successful math formula that has worked well, and in the past 5, season, and home/away...the average for Princeton/Columbia point in the direction of a game in the 120's...

I was only curious how you came up with your numbers...if you don't want to explain it's fine, just always trying to pick the mind...see what can be tweaked and what not.

Appreciate your picks.

[NYsportsfreak]

columbia may not score 40 pts

[trevlyn1983]

Im a bit new to Handicapping / Betting and wondering what stats you all normally look at when handicapping these games ... Any help would be appreciated . Thanks and Good Luck Tonight .

[Airjoe30jb]

keep up the good work roch

[talnted]

tailin tonight roch

[jorge1]

Roch roch roch

Im new to SBR as a poster, but ive been browsing over the forum for a year now. finally gonna start posting, and as one of my first posts i would like to THANK U ROCH. Been tailin your picks and im that much richer. u r gold man...waiting for your final friday card...

BTW bird shit on my head today out of nowhere + Following the ROCH = $$$

Tail the ROCH and my shat on head and u will be okay, LOL

BOL

[thecomebacker]

I got the Columbia under at 109 and seems its dropping on every line change

[Tigers1230]

This thread has blown up so it is hard to keep track of where his picks are. Just to make sure, he has 4 picks tonight. 2 totals and 2 sides?

[Axis]

^^
Correct.

And yea, my formula for over/unders may only be good for NBA...g/l to those taking the under...I didn't bet them either way

[ProfessorGoatduk]

Picks as of now are:

colum/prince under 110 2nd
weber st -11 3rd
montana/port st under 143.5 1st
fairfield -1 4th


They are ranked in order of confidence. Possibly more to come from Rochtradamus

[rochestertitans]

colum/prince under 110 2nd
weber st -11 3rd
montana/port st under 143.5 1st
fairfield -1 4th

[rochestertitans]

agan fairfield is a gut so use with caution

[tylerguy02]

Is U 108 ok for the Col/Prince game?

[namdeezy]

on you with the over/unders, BOL tonight

[rochestertitans]

yes play it to 106

[bluegg]

tailing weber st thanks for the pick

[RJ89]

Hey, what do you think about Yorel Hawkins being out for Fairfield?