Tulsa -6.5 -110 (4x)
College Hoops Plays
Collapse
X
-
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#351Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#352Utah +6.5 -110 (7x); ML +220 (1x)Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#353Monday 2/8:
TCU +2 -110 (4x)Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#354TCU is pretty bad.
OSU sucks too. I'm not touching this game.Comment -
HockeyRocksSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-10-13
- 6069
#3554 Days now and no update on your W/L's. How come???Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#356TCU hasn't scored in 7 minutes. WtfComment -
KRITSBR Posting Legend
- 01-11-14
- 12874
-
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#360Texas +7.5 -110 (3x); ML +280 (0.5x)
I think it's back to back tough games for Oklahoma. I see this being a close game. They'll fight tooth and nail and probably find a way late but I think they'll struggle a bit again coming off the loss two days ago.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#361
Texas 1H +4.5 -110 (1.5x)
Notre Dame ML +105 (2x)
No hangover for the Irish. Clemson is coming back down to earth. ND is elevating their play as the season progresses.Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#362Texas is up 13-3 and +7.5 live at Bovada right now. I took it.Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#364
I know it's 13-3 right now too so this post is useless.
OU is in a funk right now. They pulled out some tough games the last few weeks but they're not playing their best ball.
Texas is.
I have a feeling this game will goto the wire.Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#366Texas is +1.5 now.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#367Ebb and flow of the season. They were bound to come back to earth a bit.Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#368
Honestly, as a fan, I would rather them hit this rut in February instead of March. I knew it was coming.
I still think OU is closer to an elite 8 type of team than they are a Final Four national championship type team.
With that said, it's wide open. OU could shoot their way to the Final Four or have a cold night and get bounced in the second round.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#369Exactly. They were red hot early when they were up 30 on teams like Nova.
Honestly, as a fan, I would rather them hit this rut in February instead of March. I knew it was coming.
I still think OU is closer to an elite 8 type of team than they are a Final Four national championship type team.
With that said, it's wide open. OU could shoot their way to the Final Four or have a cold night and get bounced in the second round.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#370Lid on the basket for Buddy tonight.Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19311
#371
Buddy Hield scored the final 12 points for OU. Clutch!!!
I knew this game would be close and had a feeling OU would find a way to win. That's what good teams do even when they're not at their best. As for Texas, this will be a top 5 team in two years. I was a bit worried when Smart went to OU's arch rival. They've always gotten talent down there. Now they have a good coach. At this point, they're just a little too young to close out these big games. They remind me of what OU was three years ago.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#372YTD: 63-52-4 +21.13 UnitsComment -
LiverSpotSBR Hustler
- 08-26-15
- 83
#373With all due respect, I follow these boards, I don't think you are honest about your record.
You claimed your record was 50-44-4 on February 4th.
Of those 34 wagers you posted, you won 15, and lost 19.
Your wins totaled 50.08 units.
Your losses totaled 45.8 units.
Added to your totals of what you posted on February 4th, and your real totals are:
66-63-4 +15.71.
What you posted was grossly inflated.
1. Vandy ML Won 4.1 units
2. Vandy 1H ML Won 2 units
3. Colorado +10 Lost 2.2 units
4 Colorado ML +400 Lost .2 units
5. UCLA +5.5 Lost 3.3 units
6. UCLA ML Lost 1.85 units
7. Pitt +1 Lost 3.3 units
8. Villanova -4 Won 11 units
9. Kansas -13 Won 2.27 units
10. Marquette Won 2 units
11. Marquette Lost .4 units
12. Michigan +4.5 Lost 2.75 units
13. Michigan ML +175 Lost 1 unit
14. Arizona -4.5 Won 3 units
15. New Mexico 2H +3.5 Lost 3.85 units
16. New Mexico 2H ML +190 Lost 1 unit
17. South Carolina 2H +6 Won 2 units
18. South Carolina 2H ML +270 Won 1.35 units
19. Baylor +6 Lost 2.75 units
20. Baylor ML +220 Lost .5 units
21. North Carolina -2.5 Lost 8.8 units
22. Arkansas -7 Won 4 units
23. Pepperdine +6.5 Won 4 units
24. Pepperdine ML +220 Lost 1.5 units
25. Georgia Tech +3 Lost 2.2 units
26. Georgia Tech ML +135 Lost 1 unit
27. Tulsa -6.5 Won 4 units
28. Utah +6.5 Lost 7.7 units
29. Utah ML +220 Lost 1 unit
30 TCU +2 Won 4 units
31 Texas +7.5 Won 3 units
32. Texasx ML +280 Lost .5 units
33. Texas 1H +4.5 Won 1.36 units
34 Notre Dame +105 Won 2.10 unitsComment -
FlipsideRMSBR Posting Legend
- 09-28-11
- 10518
#374With all due respect, I follow these boards, I don't think you are honest about your record.
You claimed your record was 50-44-4 on February 4th.
You then posted 35 wagers from 2/4 through 2/8, although one of them was an identical wager (Villanova -4 vs Providence).
Of those 34 wagers you posted, you won 15, and lost 19.
Your wins totaled 50.08 units.
Your losses totaled 45.8 units.
Added to your totals of what you posted on February 4th, and your real totals are:
66-63-4 +15.71.
What you posted was grossly inflated.
1. Vandy ML Won 4.1 units
2. Vandy 1H ML Won 2 units
3. Colorado +10 Lost 2.2 units
4 Colorado ML +400 Lost .2 units
5. UCLA +5.5 Lost 3.3 units
6. UCLA ML Lost 1.85 units
7. Pitt +1 Lost 3.3 units
8. Villanova -4 Won 11 units
9. Kansas -13 Won 2.27 units
10. Marquette Won 2 units
11. Marquette Lost .4 units
12. Michigan +4.5 Lost 2.75 units
13. Michigan ML +175 Lost 1 unit
14. Arizona -4.5 Won 3 units
15. New Mexico 2H +3.5 Lost 3.85 units
16. New Mexico 2H ML +190 Lost 1 unit
17. South Carolina 2H +6 Won 2 units
18. South Carolina 2H ML +270 Won 1.35 units
19. Baylor +6 Lost 2.75 units
20. Baylor ML +220 Lost .5 units
21. North Carolina -2.5 Lost 8.8 units
22. Arkansas -7 Won 4 units
23. Pepperdine +6.5 Won 4 units
24. Pepperdine ML +220 Lost 1.5 units
25. Georgia Tech +3 Lost 2.2 units
26. Georgia Tech ML +135 Lost 1 unit
27. Tulsa -6.5 Won 4 units
28. Utah +6.5 Lost 7.7 units
29. Utah ML +220 Lost 1 unit
30 TCU +2 Won 4 units
31 Texas +7.5 Won 3 units
32. Texasx ML +280 Lost .5 units
33. Texas 1H +4.5 Won 1.36 units
34 Notre Dame +105 Won 2.10 unitsComment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#375With all due respect, I follow these boards, I don't think you are honest about your record.
You claimed your record was 50-44-4 on February 4th.
You then posted 35 wagers from 2/4 through 2/8, although one of them was an identical wager (Villanova -4 vs Providence).
Of those 34 wagers you posted, you won 15, and lost 19.
Your wins totaled 50.08 units.
Your losses totaled 45.8 units.
Added to your totals of what you posted on February 4th, and your real totals are:
66-63-4 +15.71.
What you posted was grossly inflated.
1. Vandy ML Won 4.1 units
2. Vandy 1H ML Won 2 units
3. Colorado +10 Lost 2.2 units
4 Colorado ML +400 Lost .2 units
5. UCLA +5.5 Lost 3.3 units
6. UCLA ML Lost 1.85 units
7. Pitt +1 Lost 3.3 units
8. Villanova -4 Won 11 units
9. Kansas -13 Won 2.27 units
10. Marquette Won 2 units
11. Marquette Lost .4 units
12. Michigan +4.5 Lost 2.75 units
13. Michigan ML +175 Lost 1 unit
14. Arizona -4.5 Won 3 units
15. New Mexico 2H +3.5 Lost 3.85 units
16. New Mexico 2H ML +190 Lost 1 unit
17. South Carolina 2H +6 Won 2 units
18. South Carolina 2H ML +270 Won 1.35 units
19. Baylor +6 Lost 2.75 units
20. Baylor ML +220 Lost .5 units
21. North Carolina -2.5 Lost 8.8 units
22. Arkansas -7 Won 4 units
23. Pepperdine +6.5 Won 4 units
24. Pepperdine ML +220 Lost 1.5 units
25. Georgia Tech +3 Lost 2.2 units
26. Georgia Tech ML +135 Lost 1 unit
27. Tulsa -6.5 Won 4 units
28. Utah +6.5 Lost 7.7 units
29. Utah ML +220 Lost 1 unit
30 TCU +2 Won 4 units
31 Texas +7.5 Won 3 units
32. Texasx ML +280 Lost .5 units
33. Texas 1H +4.5 Won 1.36 units
34 Notre Dame +105 Won 2.10 units
It's the same reason I did not count my Temple win a few weeks back.
Also, like I said all year, I have been tracking my record by games. So for instance, when I bet 3x spread, 0.5x ml, it goes down as one play. Regardless of whether both hit, one hits, both lose.Comment -
FlipsideRMSBR Posting Legend
- 09-28-11
- 10518
#376UNC and Arkansas were not posted in time. I thought they were posted but I was out and the window never loaded. UNC lost, Arkansas hit. Had both plays won, you'd all be bitching that I counted them towards my record.
It's the same reason I did not count my Temple win a few weeks back.
Also, like I said all year, I have been tracking my record by games. So for instance, when I bet 3x spread, 0.5x ml, it goes down as one play. Regardless of whether both hit, one hits, both lose.
how the Fuk does this make sense?Comment -
FlipsideRMSBR Posting Legend
- 09-28-11
- 10518
#378Clueless. Amateur hour at the Apollo
Comment -
LiverSpotSBR Hustler
- 08-26-15
- 83
#379UNC and Arkansas were not posted in time. I thought they were posted but I was out and the window never loaded. UNC lost, Arkansas hit. Had both plays won, you'd all be bitching that I counted them towards my record.
It's the same reason I did not count my Temple win a few weeks back.
Also, like I said all year, I have been tracking my record by games. So for instance, when I bet 3x spread, 0.5x ml, it goes down as one play. Regardless of whether both hit, one hits, both lose.
You can hit Marquette +12 but lose the ML. Those are two entirely different bets.
Can you understand why everyone would think that is not accurate?
It does not make any sense.
And, even if that were the case and you did grade it as such, you still would have 56 losses not the 52 you listed.
And even if you did not count the Arkansas-North Carolina games because of post-time, you still would not have 21+ units.
Your record is simply not accurate or honest.Comment -
LiverSpotSBR Hustler
- 08-26-15
- 83
#380
You could not find a single person on any gambling board that would agree with that.
An ATS wager and a ML wager are not the same.
Try it.
Bet with any book, make 2 bets. One ATS, the other ML.
If you lose either one, a book is not going to credit you with a win.
And if you happen to win ATS, but lose the ML, you will be really angry if the book graded both as a loss.Comment -
SBRMAN23SBR Hall of Famer
- 01-07-11
- 6905
#381Lmfao two different plays count as 1Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#382LiverSpot your math was way off. Worry about that before you want to critique how I record W/L's.Comment -
LiverSpotSBR Hustler
- 08-26-15
- 83
#383
You know that. Using your "ATS-ML" counts as one theory, or doing it the right way, "2 different bets, 2 different results", you have more than 52 losses.
I don't insult anyone. If you like, I could simply type out the losses so you can count them yourself.
Watch...
We both agree your starting point of February 4th where you listed 44 losses.
I'll use your "2 bets-1 loss" theory.
And eliminated North Carolina's 8.8 unit loss.
You listed 44 losses on February 4th.
I just listed another 11 losses for you below (even though it was 19), and that brings the total to 55.
Still, not your listed 52.
1. Colorado +10 Lost 2.2 units
1A Colorado ML +400 Lost .2 units
2. UCLA +5.5 Lost 3.3 units
2A.UCLA ML Lost 1.85 units
3. Pitt +1 Lost 3.3 units
4. Marquette Lost .4 units
5. Michigan +4.5 Lost 2.75 units
5A Michigan ML +175 Lost 1 unit
6. New Mexico 2H +3.5 Lost 3.85 units
6A.. New Mexico 2H ML +190 Lost 1 unit
7. Baylor +6 Lost 2.75 units
7A. Baylor ML +220 Lost .5 units
8. Pepperdine ML +220 Lost 1.5 units
9. Georgia Tech +3 Lost 2.2 units
9A.. Georgia Tech ML +135 Lost 1 unit
10. Utah +6.5 Lost 7.7 units
10A. Utah ML +220 Lost 1 unit
11. Texasx ML +280 Lost .5 units
Comment -
LiverSpotSBR Hustler
- 08-26-15
- 83
#384Do you want me to list the math as well to prove you don't have 21+ units?
Let me know.Comment -
t-wizzleBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-18-09
- 38099
#385Marquette, Pepperdine, Texas you just listed as if I didn't take the spread for more and won on all 3.
Liver you're way off here man. Way way off. My math is spot on down to the hundredth of a unit.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code