1. #1
    Illusion
    Illusion's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-09-05
    Posts: 25,166

    O'Brien to get about $2.2M for Ohio State firing

    COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Ohio State must pay former basketball coach Jim O'Brien about $2.2 million plus interest for firing him for giving a recruit $6,000.

    The award by a judge in the Ohio Court of Claims on Wednesday ends two years of controversy at Ohio State, which received NCAA sanctions for the money given to the recruit.

    The 56-year-old O'Brien, who coached the Buckeyes for seven years, guided them to the Final Four in 1999. He was fired in June of 2004 after revealing to then-athletic director Andy Geiger that he had given the money to Serbian prospect Aleksandar Radojevic. He had sought $3.6 million in his lawsuit.

    O'Brien charged that the university did not follow his contract in releasing him. Judge Joseph T. Clark agreed, ruling in February that O'Brien broke his contract by giving the money and failing to inform university officials, but the error was not serious enough to warrant firing. The university violated the contract by firing him without compensation, the ruling said.

    In his ruling, Clark said, "... this single, isolated failure of performance was not so egregious" to lead to O'Brien's firing under the lenient terms of his contract.

    A subsequent investigation vacated that trip to the Final Four and found that O'Brien had violated NCAA bylaws. The sanctioning body of college sports put Ohio State on three years of probation in March for violations that including those that occurred in the basketball program under O'Brien.

    O'Brien had asked for reimbursement for his annual salary of $236,552, plus damages of $3.3 million. His contract specified he was due 3½ times his base salary for the length of the time remaining on the agreement. He still had more than five years left on the contract.

    Ohio State contended he was owed nothing because he violated his contract by breaking NCAA rules.



    "We continue to believe that the university acted appropriately in dismissing coach O'Brien," Ohio State vice president and general counsel Christopher M. Culley said in a statement. "The NCAA sanctions that followed the court's initial decision in February 2006 validated the serious nature of the violations and reinforced to us that we took the appropriate action in terminating his contract."

    Culley said he expected the university to appeal the decision.

    Joseph Murray, O'Brien's lead attorney, said he did not have an immediate comment.



    O'Brien coached the Buckeyes to a 133-88 record that included two Big Ten titles and a conference tournament title. He said he gave the money to Radojevic in 1999 because the player's father was dying and the family was unable to pay for medicine or a funeral.

    Geiger didn't find out about the payment for more than five years. In that time, Radojevic had been ruled ineligible by the NCAA for accepting $9,000 to play in his native Yugoslavia. Ohio State then appealed to the NCAA to restore Radojevic's eligibility -- with O'Brien not mentioning the payment during the lengthy appeal process.

    The appeal also was turned down and Radojevic never played for the Buckeyes.

  2. #2
    bigboydan
    bigboydan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 55,425

    that judge is an idiot, because he encourages cheating apparently. just how dumb are these judges in Ohio.

  3. #3
    isetcap
    isetcap's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-16-05
    Posts: 4,006

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboydan
    that judge is an idiot, because he encourages cheating apparently. just how dumb are these judges in Ohio.
    The judge was making a decision on the validity of the contract that was agreed upon by both parties. It's the university's fault for using language that would bind them beyond a disciplinary dismissal. The university handled the situation poorly in light of the contract they had with O'Brien and therefore he received the compensation he was due.

    The judge was in no position to further punish O'Brien for his wrongdoing and should be applauded for executing the judicial process in an unbiased manner based on the evidence that was presented in his courtroom. It is rare and refreshing to see an instance when real justice overcomes tabloid justice.

Top