Tues hoops

[2daBank]

Busy as hell last 2 days but just had time to run thru tonight's card real quick.. Didn't see a lot I liked, only played 2 gms..

Miz/lsu ov 138... Generally the pace of miz gms is dictated by opponent as they will play slow against grinding teams but the more uptempo teams they play they tend to run a little more, think this be played at a good pace and they knock enough shots down to get in the 140s..

Clem+11.. I really like pit but just don't think it easy to beat a team like Clem by double digits when they will make u play a game in the low 60s, tigers score 55 should be enough to cover...

[NJcap]

like the picks banktster....im on the 1h over for 2 units and over 202.5 in the jazz game for 4 units....BOL

[Louisvillekid1]

Wow Clemson?

First time we disagreed in a long time

[No coincidences]

Wow Clemson?

First time we disagreed in a long time

In the past, a high spread with a low total typically = blowout.

Since Vegas has been copying KenPom's homework, who knows.

[2daBank]

I dunno what to say lk? I'm sorry,.. Lol

feels like too many points to me but it possible Clemson doesn't get me 50.

[2daBank]

Felt like 2 plays just wasn't enough so half unit each on

Temple+12

Rutgers/smu un 136.5

Gl everyone..

[Louisvillekid1]

Banker you got 10 min to share how you could play this weak ACC team visiting the zoo?

[Louisvillekid1]

I mean I got this 72-54

[Louisvillekid1]

They playing with the big boys this ain't conference game as far as I'm concerned

[Louisvillekid1]

You know I'm adding another Hundo making this first b2b 2x plays since I been here

[You mad bro]

They playing with the big boys this ain't conference game as far as I'm concerned

but but but clemson beat duke

my blue devils suck this year i know

i have pitt winning this game 67-52

[No coincidences]

Doesn't the Pitt/Clemson under make sense guys?

[Louisvillekid1]

Clemson Tt prob good play if under 55

[2daBank]

Banker you got 10 min to share how you could play this weak ACC team visiting the zoo?

Pit has played 2 good defensive teams all yr, in those 2 gms they failed to score 60... Not sure why I should believe they can hit much more than that number against Clem in a gm that be played at a snails pace? Maybe Clem garbage offense fails to get in the 50s but when all I need is a team to get into the 50s to cover I usually take it..

[No coincidences]

I like Northwestern +3.5 and Texas -5.

[2daBank]

I mean I got this 72-54

I feel like u seriously overrating pit offense with that number but I been wrong before.. I don't see how they get more than 65 tops..

[You mad bro]

anyone like michigan state?

[2daBank]

I like Northwestern +3.5 and Texas -5.

I don't dislike either really. I think tex should be the fav but not sure bout 5... I might ml parlay tex/lsu

[No coincidences]

anyone like michigan state?

Not with Payne out, a lookahead to Michigan on Saturday, them covering a bunch of games in a row and having routed IU on the road already earlier this season. MSU has been better on the road than at home, too.

[You mad bro]

Not with Payne out, a lookahead to Michigan on Saturday, them covering a bunch of games in a row and having routed IU on the road already earlier this season. MSU has been better on the road than at home, too.

yeah they are 5-5 ats at home and 5-1 ats on the road

13 does seem like a lot but indiana didn't even reach 50 against northwestern at home in their last game

[grease lightnin]

Anybody have thoughts on Butler @ Providence? Providence seems to be a better team at home...worth laying 5.5?

[grease lightnin]

...down to 5...

[BiffTFinancial]

Doesn't the Pitt/Clemson under make sense guys?

No way. College hoops totals are for suckers.

[BiffTFinancial]

Clemson Tt prob good play if under 55

agree, considered it.

[BiffTFinancial]

Say it ain't so on Clemson, Bank. We don't disagree often, but at least one of us will win.

like Northwestern TT under. Mildcats will not score more than 55.

Lean LSU at 7 but probably passing.

Going in for a closer look on Rutgers/SMU total. I skipped that game, but SMU at home is fkn lights out this season.

BOL tonight Bank.

[No coincidences]

Like Indiana now that it's up to 13.5.

[No coincidences]

No way. College hoops totals are for suckers.

LOL -- you nailed that DePaul over. Wish I would've taken that instead of the Demons, who decided to be allergic to defense yesterday.

[You mad bro]

took indiana after that 13.5 jump

who knows

[KRIT]

Kind of like a lot of faves today. I'm on:

LSU -5, BC -5.5, Pitt -10, Texas, 5

ML Parlay: Texas ML/OKC Thunder ML pays even.

[ebbearsfb1]

butler and boise +5.5 separate and teased to 9.5

for me tonight

hoping for the best

[BiffTFinancial]

LOL -- you nailed that DePaul over. Wish I would've taken that instead of the Demons, who decided to be allergic to defense yesterday.

That was fun. Watched the last ten minutes of that one at the bar after work. Wish they could all be like that and UVA.

[BiffTFinancial]

Felt like 2 plays just wasn't enough so half unit each on

Temple+12

Rutgers/smu un 136.5

Gl everyone..

I get around 130-131 on Rutgers/SMU. Like under but gonna play Rutgers TT under 62'. I think it's something like SMU, 75-55.

[2daBank]

Everyone against me on Clem, lol.. At least if I'm wrong y'all will win !

[grease lightnin]

butler and boise +5.5 separate and teased to 9.5

for me tonight

hoping for the best

Why Butler? Within the last week or so I watched them drop a big lead to DePaul in the 2nd half to lose in double OT at home, and then watched them lose to Gtown in OT @ home...look at what happened to the Hoyas @ Providence. Not that I know anything, I don't know jack. Just wondering what I am missing...

[You mad bro]

watching michigan st struggle at home is hysterical

indiana 13.5 should be enough