I see this a lot on this forum. People go big on a side just because they think the other side is a trap. So since the Thunder have the best record in the NBA and Boston is 4-7 looking like shit, Boston must be the play because the line is so low???
I would like some Boston backers to chime in here. Why are you taking Boston? Do you guys have any other reason than "the line is telling me to"?
Personally, I'm not betting on the game because I'm a huge Thunder fan. I don't like betting on teams I'm a fan of because of bias. With that said, I don't see how anyone could back Boston here. I know the line is fishy, etc but give me a good reason to take the Celtics besides the line.
If the Thunder win, I don't want to hear crap like, "Well, the squares won again". Is it really square if the an 11-2 team covers three against an old team that is 4-7 and struggling?
I would like some Boston backers to chime in here. Why are you taking Boston? Do you guys have any other reason than "the line is telling me to"?
Personally, I'm not betting on the game because I'm a huge Thunder fan. I don't like betting on teams I'm a fan of because of bias. With that said, I don't see how anyone could back Boston here. I know the line is fishy, etc but give me a good reason to take the Celtics besides the line.
If the Thunder win, I don't want to hear crap like, "Well, the squares won again". Is it really square if the an 11-2 team covers three against an old team that is 4-7 and struggling?