lakers at memphis

[top310]

Someone tell me why I shouldnt pound the moneyline

[Stinger]

I can't see the Lakers losing 3 in a row, especially to the Grizzlies, I might pull the trigger here too.

[BelieveTheHype]

Yeah. It's really difficult for me to see the Lakers losing three in a row and the Grizzlies don't match up very well with the Lakers with undersized Randolph and the Gasol brothers.

[jspectyper]

Liking the lakers here as well. What about the over guys?

[Pensinger1]

Why don't u guys look at the two games the Lakers played in Memphis last year and get back to me...

[nbarlotta3]

Lakers haven't been playing too well lately.

[BernardMadoff]

Why don't u guys look at the two games the Lakers played in Memphis last year and get back to me...

There usually close, line inflated because the public will think the Lakers will surely not lose 3 in a row, they may not lose and not cover.

[lolbear]

lakers and spurs ML parlay maybe

[top310]

id say throw in Boston better, Since its a revenge game for Boston plus
Cleveland is looking ahead for Miami

[jcygts6]

watch out guys! This is a revenge game for memphis. I see memphis winning SU

[mtbaker]

tough call- would hit memphis but gonna lay off after lake show lost on Sunday

[Bartmeister]

Maybe next game

[absolute]

cant see lakers losing 3 in a row.

[maxvalue1]

like the OVER 204

[breathmints]

i already pounded the lakers.. its my last of what i have till i make another deposit.. shit .. lakers getting crazy .. but there not going to lose.. bought them at -3 -170 ... memphis is playing really well at home latey.. but 1st half they will lose and lakers will beat them in the 4th with superstar kobe

[dude_bg]

just something to make u feel better on the ML
lakers are 15-1 coming off 2 losses, in recent years

[BernardMadoff]

just something to make u feel better on the ML
lakers are 15-1 coming off 2 losses, in recent years

Thats not true and far from it.

[dude_bg]

hmm, have to check i kind of have it in my mind, apologies if i have mislead someone

[dude_bg]

Thats not true and far from it.

10/11 1-0
09/10 6-1
08/09 4-0
07/08 6-0
These are after Gasol came to LAkers including playoffs, so that makes me right!

not far from it at all!!!!!!!

[maxcraft]

just play this parlay.. better than laying large chalk with Lakers ML..

BOS ML, SAS ML, ORL ML and LAL ML... thank me later..

[BernardMadoff]

10/11 1-0
09/10 6-1
08/09 4-0
07/08 6-0
These are after Gasol came to LAkers including playoffs, so that makes me right!

not far from it at all!!!!!!!

Not sure where youre getting youre numbers from but their wrong. Their actually 12-3 during the regular season since 07/08.

[colts]

Not sure where youre getting youre numbers from but their wrong. Their actually 12-3 during the regular season since 07/08.

You are correct BM. NOT INCLUDING PLAYOFFS, Lakers are

10/11 (1 - 0)
09/10 (4 - 1)
08/09 (4 - 0)
07/08 (3 - 2)

Stats from the gol*sheet

[TGHMak]

Rare occasion there decent value on the lakers

[dude_bg]

Not sure where youre getting youre numbers from but their wrong. Their actually 12-3 during the regular season since 07/08.

well haven't checked without the playoffs, but i think the 2 streaks of losing 3 in a row are in 07/08 and are pre-gasol numbers

[Pensinger1]

Tried to warn you guys.. better luck next time.