that 70's % show
20 games are in! i used to track this a decade ago if any of you guys remember.
we'll see if this system still checks out.
11/30 2 plays: *im surprised it produced a couple of plays already!
suns -4.5 (-5.5) #11.00
celtics -9.5 #10.17
~ playing this by ear. dunno how to go abt load mgmt - tatum, horford & brown?. my personal opinion, it's not a real injury were the player needed some timeoff/rehab (ex. siakam). so im counting this one as an official play as of now. if brown doesn't play, then this becomes a NO play. idk i guess he's really injured?
-------
N/A due to filter/s:
nuggets -11.50 (-13) #11.50 ~ dd spread
blazers +5.5 #10.27 ~ b2b
--------
other games (posting here initially for transparency/cross-checking):
cavs -3.5 #1.88
hawks -5.5 #5.79
wizards +6.5 #4.69
bucks -5.5 #4.53
grizzlies -3.5 #-0.31 *bordering a play for wolves
pelicans -1.5 #4.00
thunder -6.5 #1.26
clippers +6.5 #6.96
pacers +4.5 #5.18
-------
index/notes for reference:
(-13) ~ spread in parenthesis means 'playable up to'.
#10.** ~ derived from calculation. *play if 10 or > or if < / = -1, play other team
ps. not my system(!). kindly just find the old thread to understand the mechanics of this system OR perhaps someone who is familiar with this system can explain it here. me, im just doing this for fun. if there are none posted in the future, it probably means there are no plays. this system hardly ever produces plays!! 20, if lucky. if i miss something (miscalculations or missed system plays), feel free to comment.
also, starter injuries had been a big debate before. im sure it'd still be. especially with player load management. etc. not sure how to really go about it so we'll just play it by ear. dont blame the system (or me) if an 'official' play becomes null and void because a player all of sudden was ruled in/out. *see celtics above.
that's it for now. will check back later. bol to all!
20 games are in! i used to track this a decade ago if any of you guys remember.
we'll see if this system still checks out.11/30 2 plays: *im surprised it produced a couple of plays already!
suns -4.5 (-5.5) #11.00
celtics -9.5 #10.17
~ playing this by ear. dunno how to go abt load mgmt - tatum, horford & brown?. my personal opinion, it's not a real injury were the player needed some timeoff/rehab (ex. siakam). so im counting this one as an official play as of now. if brown doesn't play, then this becomes a NO play. idk i guess he's really injured?
-------
N/A due to filter/s:
nuggets -11.50 (-13) #11.50 ~ dd spread
blazers +5.5 #10.27 ~ b2b
--------
other games (posting here initially for transparency/cross-checking):
cavs -3.5 #1.88
hawks -5.5 #5.79
wizards +6.5 #4.69
bucks -5.5 #4.53
grizzlies -3.5 #-0.31 *bordering a play for wolves
pelicans -1.5 #4.00
thunder -6.5 #1.26
clippers +6.5 #6.96
pacers +4.5 #5.18
-------
index/notes for reference:
(-13) ~ spread in parenthesis means 'playable up to'.
#10.** ~ derived from calculation. *play if 10 or > or if < / = -1, play other team
ps. not my system(!). kindly just find the old thread to understand the mechanics of this system OR perhaps someone who is familiar with this system can explain it here. me, im just doing this for fun. if there are none posted in the future, it probably means there are no plays. this system hardly ever produces plays!! 20, if lucky. if i miss something (miscalculations or missed system plays), feel free to comment.
also, starter injuries had been a big debate before. im sure it'd still be. especially with player load management. etc. not sure how to really go about it so we'll just play it by ear. dont blame the system (or me) if an 'official' play becomes null and void because a player all of sudden was ruled in/out. *see celtics above.
that's it for now. will check back later. bol to all!
