"70% math play" system tracking

**mundane** · 12-11-08, 03:47 AM

12/11 we have a play!

i think this one applies. no injuries on celtics. it's not b2b.

ytd: 0-0

**porkchop817** · 12-11-08, 03:50 AM

celtics is the play ATS, right? Or is it the ML?

**mundane** · 12-11-08, 03:59 AM

i believe this system is ATS betting since it takes into account the spread. no mention of ML whatsoever. but if u like (small) ML play, i dont see why not.

this is not my system btw. this has been brought up here saying it's a 70% winning system. i figured i make an excel sheet for it and created this thread to keep track of the PLAYS. time will tell!

**turboj** · 12-11-08, 04:46 AM

how about por@utah? no play coz of the injuries? thanks

**porkchop817** · 12-11-08, 05:55 AM

Yeah, I read the NBA MATH post...but I didn't see where it said definitively either way, concerning ATS/ML.

Theres no value in the Celtics ML, so I wouldn't bet that way anyway, just curious about the system.

**strictlywinners** · 12-11-08, 04:35 PM

Spread just moved to 10 so is it a no play then.

**bostonbruins** · 12-11-08, 04:50 PM

But the spread moved so if you buy it back to 9.5 it's still good? Is this based on opening lines?

**mundane** · 12-11-08, 05:32 PM

idk.

please stop asking me!

i dont have an all absolute answer for any inquiries about this 'system'.

like i mentioned, im juzz gonna (try to) keep track of whatever game/s i see fit for this 'system'. that's all!

bet at ur own disgretion! as im not gonna take shit if this system doesnt pan out for anyone!

**strictlywinners** · 12-11-08, 06:54 PM

Oh ok, I thought it was yours, I was going to track it as well, hence the questions.

**B1GER1C828** · 12-11-08, 07:13 PM

well iguess i hope its rong, i went on wash +10

**nick2060** · 12-11-08, 07:44 PM

I know it didn't say any specific rules as to opening lines or closing but i dont think this should really be a play seeing at the spread is 10 now, but i guess it doesn't matter cause its about the long term and i doubt anybodies tailing the system right now anyways

**bostonbruins** · 12-11-08, 08:26 PM

Yea, I thought mine was a pretty simple question. Don't worry, I'm not blindly betting on your system bud.

**mundane** · 12-11-08, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by bostonbruins

Yea, I thought mine was a pretty simple question. Don't worry, I'm not blindly betting on your system bud.

again not my system!

**mundane** · 12-11-08, 09:06 PM

edit: let me just reiterate this, THIS IS NOT MY SYSTEM! im merely tracking how this system goes.

**MexicanStallion** · 12-11-08, 09:55 PM

Why give up on this? It is one day of testing. See how everything works

**losturmarbles** · 12-11-08, 09:57 PM

boston up by only 14 now. might be close. i wish your system told me to take the 1st half.

**Mr.Bushido** · 12-11-08, 10:52 PM

good start.

**Mr.Bushido** · 12-12-08, 12:55 AM

tomorrow

SAS@MIN (619-190)/20=21.45-3(away)-7(spread)=11.45(final number) PICK SAS

~~LAC@POR (652-190)/20=23.1+3(home)-9.5(spread)=16.6(final number) PICK POR~~(back to back)

GL

**AdaBarber** · 12-12-08, 09:30 AM

I tailed the Boston play. It worked well. I guess you have to catch it when the line first opens up. That would be my guess. it wouldn't make sense to use a line that moved pass ten.

**mundane** · 12-12-08, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by MexicanStallion

Why give up on this? It is one day of testing. See how everything works

idk. some things ^^^ bug me...

**mundane** · 12-12-08, 11:06 AM

let me just reiterate this, THIS IS NOT MY SYSTEM! im merely tracking how this system goes.

PLAY ON SPURS -7 (UP TO -8)

POSSIBLE PLAY: MAGIC +3 OR HIGHER

IF CAVS LINE WENT DOWN TO -9.5, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A PLAY BUT 1 STARTER IS MISSING (ILGAUSKAS). SO A NO PLAY!

**zackattack** · 12-12-08, 11:35 AM

good job mundane.......the spread on magic is -1......so should we play this or is it now a no play?

**mundane** · 12-12-08, 11:46 AM

system says no play. so that doesn't count. only play today is spurs -7 (-8) accrdng to this system.

personally, id play magic on this spot. intact road warriors magic vs eclipsing suns? easy pick! hopefully these undermanned suns dont play out of their minds again (ie lakers game).

**strybie** · 12-12-08, 03:19 PM

Originally posted by mundane

system says no play. so that doesn't count. only play today is spurs -7 (-8) accrdng to this system.

personally, id play magic on this spot. intact road warriors magic vs eclipsing suns? easy pick! hopefully these undermanned suns dont play out of their minds again (ie lakers game).

You can play orlando in additional point spread. It pays a bit less.

**turboj** · 12-12-08, 11:19 PM

yahoo! spur won the system is 2-0. nice work.

**mundane** · 12-13-08, 05:54 AM

12/13

no lines yet but possible play on the @nuggs vs gsw. im not sure how to quantify kenyon martin though.

we dont know who came up with this system so we cant really direct any question or inquiry about this but i believe if this system need a strict adherance to the 'rules', this is a no play. how sadd!

maybe i'll put an asterisk on my tracking if this so happen to be a play (<9.5 spread).

all other games are back to backs. equate to no play.

**NBA Hero** · 12-13-08, 07:00 AM

nice call on the spurs. no call yet for the day?

you do the math, har har, and wont get any comment from me

**turboj** · 12-13-08, 07:59 AM

nice work. can u make available the excel file. thanks

**demize21** · 12-13-08, 10:03 AM

can you post the plays that the system thinks should win/cover for the day?

**mundane** · 12-13-08, 10:19 AM

.

**mundane** · 12-13-08, 10:20 AM

.dead link

**losturmarbles** · 12-13-08, 11:53 AM

File upload seems to be abandoned by sender :/

**turboj** · 12-13-08, 12:05 PM

can't download the file?

**demize21** · 12-13-08, 04:06 PM

me either???