Very nice. Tough beat on Grizz/Kings.
-
Comment -
no more picks on B2B's, they are so misleading.. when i pick it and watch, it comes in,Originally posted by Ratzz
when i pick it and go for it.. sometimes.
that lost for that reason..*
just regular games... both teams on two days rest.. it creates a missed basket or two, and that's the difference.
Comment -
no-, i know exactly what went wrong today.. eliminate B2B's and the reason why MIL did not come inOriginally posted by tonywayne
(which i found)
so we should be good*
Comment -
Great work keep it upComment -
Jan 30th
i typed in wrong figures.. my apologies
(thnx, Trep)
Comment -
Think you have some of the numbers off. I think you have the quarter numbers for half and vice versa. Both of my books showing:
1st quarter, 1st half
36 PHX +4 +7
37 CLE +1.5 +3.5
38 LAC +1.5 +3
It's awesome you're getting these out earlier though =) Thanks!Comment -
What has you capping 1H's instead of just 1Q's?
And I agree, great to have these out a bit earlier! Sometimes I miss a few picks later in the afternoon, as I'm on the Pacific Coast and it's right in the middle of my commute time.Comment -
Correct. Going by numbers posted or by quarter/halves?
I'm liking LAC....just wondering if I should take them 1q or 1half.
They have been hot in 1q, and could deflate from being a b2b as the game wears on...but gsw can put up points quickly. Leaning towards 1q. Defense may fade as game wears on and golden state starts warming up.Comment -
Good point, blerp. Both Phoenix & LAC are on B2B, which I thought were now being skipped for the purposes of this system...Comment -
dang.. did it again
Comment -
i thought to skip them.. but then decided to do Money Line for favorites (1H)*Originally posted by tonywayne
Comment -
Jan 30th
36) PHX___+7___1ST HALF @ Indiana
37) CLE___+1.5___1ST QTR @ New York
38) LAC___+3___1ST HALF @ Golden St.
ok. these figures are good,
a single 1Q, and two 1H's*
apologies for the mix-up
Comment -
Keeping PHX even tho maybe no dragic ?Comment -
bets are not placed yet.. i meant to asterisk that.. with that annotation.Originally posted by blerpblerp
thank you for pointing that out.. (game-time decision)*
Comment -
I've got Cleveland +2 (-105) for the 1Q on Bovada. Yippee.
Comment -
sweetness!!Originally posted by tonywayneI've got Cleveland +2 (-105) for the 1Q on Bovada. Yippee.
Comment -
Dragic is playing per RotoworldComment -
i thought that he would. Thank you for posting this, CK, *Originally posted by crazykind
Comment -
Dont like ur phx or cle pick bc knicks will come out dominant and phx will catch up 2nd half when pacers slow a little.
But GLComment -
PHX looks like gold so far... highly doubt IND outscores them by 21 pts or so in the 2QOriginally posted by MikeyD323
but hey, anything can happen... let's see
Comment -
Ya looks good. I ddnt take anything as like i stated wrongly towards you, i dont like anything lol. Hope u won budOriginally posted by RatzzComment -
not at all, sir.. i think all cappers share a common goal..Originally posted by MikeyD323
i hope you do well tonite as well... *cheerz, ®
Comment -
Good call on Phoenix. Wow. I wasn't expecting them to take the Pacers to the shed like that.Comment -
have to look at Cleveland... again, figure that one out.. head scratcher.. did not show up
Comment -
Not so much Cleveland, really. Halfway thru 1Q and they're shooting 45%. But NY is shooting 76%, which includes 4-5 threes and 6-8 free throws. Tough to beat a team shooting the lights out...Originally posted by RatzzComment -
sorry about Cleveland... i found the error
(will eliminate for the future)
Comment -
your error is in the assumption you can see into the future.Originally posted by Ratzz
BOLComment -
i have never claimed that i could see into the future. If i could– i would be 100%,Originally posted by SpreadSniper
and would have successfully predicted the outcome of the CLE/NYK 1Q
what i can do is make prognoses, based on events that have occurred in the past..
no one can 'see' into the future.
but people make fortunes every day anticipating that certain events will unfold.
(of course the opposite is also true).
so, you may determine for yourself if the point is moot.
Comment -
Interested in your plays tomm!
Took the clips today 1h...They could be flat, but I trust the extra 1.5pts we're getting for first half rather than 1q at +1.5. I just hope they have enough energy on both ends of the court today for both quarters.
Tommorrow I'm really feeling Dallas and Minnesota.Comment -
Jan 31st
39) MIL___+1.5___1ST QTR*@ Orlando
Comment -
Best of luck buddy. May tailComment -
Originally posted by Ratzz
Just curious... what has you ever betting on Milwaukee? Not just because of last time, but given how terrible they are this season, why would you ever trust them with your money?
A couple stats that will keep me away from betting them: they are dead last in 1Q points per game & dead last in 1Q margin per game.
I know you're working on your system, and I don't have any idea what you're using to decide on picks, but I know I would personally rather look elsewhere for decent bets...
Just my $0.02...
(Of course, now I've said all this and they'll go out and win the 1Q tonight... hahaha...)Comment -
Originally posted by Ratzz
Again, Ratzz??
They burned you last time and they're burning you again now.
I'm tellin ya man...create a bank of poisonous teams and throw them in there.Comment -
Jan 31st
40) SAC/DAL___UNDER 54.5___1ST QTR
sorry about MIL.
prolly scratch team off list
Comment -
Jan 31st
41) TOR/DEN___OVER 52___1ST QTR
Comment
