• NBA Payday •

[comon kryptonite]

good work...

[DarkEraNYSports]

Sloppy half by the pacers. 14 turnovers can't be accounted for. Thanks for the plays either way and Bol the rest of the night.

[Ratzz]

my apologies, gentlemen..
i think Nash is just too old to wager on...
having him on defense is like killing a penalty in hockey.
*the other team inevitably scores.

again. sorry for the two bad picks.

let's see if we can take one back with the next game

[Ratzz]

Feb 4th

57) CHI___+4.5__1ST HALF in Phoenix

[Ratzz]

Feb 4th

58) CHA/GSW___Over 50.5__1ST QTR

that's better... (Chicago behaving as expected)

[Trep]

Wow that lakers game was close.

gsw game they're coming out running. Hope the shots stick

[Trep]

Guess ill stay quiet next time. Oh well. At least day's almost over

[Ratzz]

Feb 5th

59) CLE___–2__1ST QTR vs. Lakers

60) ORL___+0.5__1ST QTR vs. Detroit

61) BOS/PHI___Under 52__1ST QTR

62) WAS___+0.5__1ST QTR vs. San Antonio

three homes and an Under

[Ratzz]

Feb 5th

63) SAC___pk__1ST QTR *vs.Toronto

[Ro0k]

Very nice work, thank you.

[ChicagoCover]

3-2 is better than 2-3, nice night RATZ

[Ratzz]

Feb 6th

64) GSW__–2.5__1ST QTR* vs.Chicago

I was running some tests late last night and early today.
I apologize for the shaky picks last two days (5-5) in that period.
I usually post better than that.

Learning to read stats is one thing..
learning to read between the lines of stats is clearly another.
I am working on that...

but I think i found what i found misleading. i certainly hope so.

Cheers to you all, ®

[Ratzz]

3-2 is better than 2-3, nice night RATZ

Thank you Chicago, i am working on it..

sorry to pick against Chicago this evening.. it's just the 1Q.. and of course Bulls so depleted
would be diff story with Rose in there

hope you make out this evening

cheers, ®

[Trep]

Interesting. One of my books is at -1.5 -125 and other is -2 +100...so I'm assuming both are moving to settling at -1.5.

Going to wait a little more until game time to see if I can grab -1.5 =)

I took Nets -2 1Q earlier and got totaled =( At least it was fast.

Let's see if we can go 1-0 =)

[MikeyD323]

Why did my line drop 3pts to -5.5????

[Trep]

You're looking at the game line not 1Q.

[Trep]

Holy crap. Warriors are starting like they played last game.

[Trep]

I should just learn to avoid Thursdays =(

[Ratzz]

Feb 7th

65) UTA__+2.5__1ST QTR* in Dallas

things looking more clear to me..

let's see, GL to all

[tonywayne]

Feb 7th

65) UTA__+2.5__1ST QTR* in Dallas

things looking more clear to me..

let's see, GL to all

I came up with Utah in the 1Q as well; got +3 at Bovada. Yay. GL indeed!

[Trep]

I barely have any idea who this Marvin Williams guy is...but thank you (I have game over as well) and keep doing what you're doing lol

[Trep]

Can't believe he missed both those free throws...

[tonywayne]

Can't believe he missed both those free throws...

I can't believe Utah was up 21-14, then lost the quarter 23-28. Sheesh.

[Ratzz]

insane.. looked like good call... Jazz leading 23-17...
then Dallas scores 11 straight

[Ratzz]

Feb 7th

66) MIN/N.O.__Under 50__1ST QTR

[Ratzz]

*Feb 7th

67) MIN__pk__1ST QTR* in New Orleans

[tonywayne]

insane.. looked like good call... Jazz leading 23-17...
then Dallas scores 11 straight

... the one thing we can't factor into anything we analyze. Never can tell when a team will reel off 10+ straight points... Ugh...

[MikeyD323]

I barely have any idea who this Marvin Williams guy is...but thank you (I have game over as well) and keep doing what you're doing lol

Still think over?

[Trep]

Still think over?

What kind of question is that? It's a bet that's locked in. Doesn't matter what I think during the game...

[tonywayne]

What kind of question is that? It's a bet that's locked in. Doesn't matter what I think during the game...

Seems like a fair conversational question. I took LAL/PHI under 218 and was sure I was going to lose with a 64-61 halftime score. But I came out a winner at 210; doesn't change that I was doubting my pick after the fact...

[Trep]

Seems like a fair conversational question. I took LAL/PHI under 218 and was sure I was going to lose with a 64-61 halftime score. But I came out a winner at 210; doesn't change that I was doubting my pick after the fact...

Sure =) Thought it was in a kind of mocking tone. Yea...I don't know really as Mavs seems dead on for shooting, but those legs and age does catch up to them. Utah is not getting any real body work and getting basically no free throws. Oh well. Let's see how it goes.

[Ratzz]

\Feb 7th

68) TOR/LAC__Under 52.5__1ST QTR

missed a couple this evening, but understand the dynamics more and more.
Look forward until tomorrow

the ones i lost... i was up the whole way until the very end.

While still a loss. It's a good sign that on right track,
and barking up the right tree.

[tonywayne]

\Feb 7th

68) TOR/LAC__Under 52.5__1ST QTR

I'm on this one with you, at under 52.

[Trep]

Almost crapped myself when Derozan's shot went in. Thank god that didn't count. Finally a hit =)

[Ratzz]

Almost crapped myself when Derozan's shot went in. Thank god that didn't count. Finally a hit =)

the best was that last minute... turnovers and two missed shots..

i think Toronto looks good, i think they will cover this (+6) pts..
they could win late..

also, i do not think that the Pelicans will come back on Minny..

Minnesota wins that in new Orleans*