*Feb 8th
69) SAS__–1.5__1ST QTR* in Charlotte
Spurs have been slow starters of late..
maybe time to turn that around
69) SAS__–1.5__1ST QTR* in Charlotte
Spurs have been slow starters of late..
maybe time to turn that around
-
Comment -
maybe the Spurs are just washed up...
maybe i have to scratch them off the list altogether..
no team with starters over 35...
looks like they just hit that wall... where they are useless..
Comment -
IMO they are still a good bet vs the right opponent.
The Bobcats' play has improved of late....The Spurs are still 2nd in the NBA in 1st Q margin even with their recent injuries and poor starts.Comment -
Was pretty happy to get that line at -1 earlier in the day. Thought it was a massive bargain. Guess it didn't turn out as expectedComment -
*Feb 9th
70) LAK__+0.5__1ST QTR* vs. Chicago
71) LAK__+3__GAME* vs. Chicago
Improved Lakers.. coming home
Comment -
it's Nash.
I totally spaced on his presence and effect, i was just looking at numbers.
if NASH is not in, Lakers win by 10.
in 21 minutes of playing time, Nash was (–24)
the Lakers lost more than a point per minute with him in there.
i had devised games with disqualifying factors like: "No starters 36 or over"
and i forgot about that.
this game would have been disqualified based on that rule.
Comment -
Feb 9th
72) CLE__+3.5__Game* vs. Memphis
Comment -
Feb 9th
73) PHI__+16__GAME**vs. the L.A. Clippers
Comment -
Do u have pick for 1st qtr of clip/phi game?Comment -
Feb 9th
74) PHI__+9.5__1ST HALF* vs. the L.A. Clippers
Comment -
Yikes. I admire anyone that was willing to bet LA to cover by 30+ points...Comment -
Feb 10th
75) TOR__–4__1ST HALF* vs. New orleans
Comment -
Feb 10th
76) HOU__–1__1ST QTR* vs. Minnesota
Comment
