[angtank]

Has anyone used them before? If so I would love to talk about the Super Situations. Been trying to pick them apart cuz of the over load in info.

Thanks
Angtank

[Dark Horse]

They're good at collecting data, but not at analyzing data. You're better off creating your own super situations.

They did attract some good cappers on their forum for a while, but statfox messed things up and most left their HOF. I think they're having a hard time keeping up with the times, or are too stuck to their data templates. Where SBR is an example of a very dynamic approach, statfox is very stagnant. Comparing it to stocks, SBR may have gone from 10 to 100 and statfox from 30 to 5 in the last five years. They were probably hurt by their decision not to advertise sportsbooks (after the new internet legislation). If I were them I would increase the number of magazine publications, such as for the NCAAF bowls, March Madness, etc. There's a gambling market for quick up-to-date magazines with a short shelf life (think major golf tournaments, tennis grand slams, Triple Crown races, etc) that they could corner. Download only would work.

[Sawyer]

Statfox Forum is nice

[skrtelfan]

They're good at collecting data, but not at analyzing data. You're better off creating your own super situations.

Exactly. They're a good resource if you want archived lines and similar, but their individual game analysis is small sample garbage.

[bigbank]

agree, great for stats, don't follow their game analysis.

[LT Profits]

You mean you don't put much credence in how teams do on a Wednesday when favored by between -125 and -150 and coming off of a win while playing on grass vs. a pitcher with an ERA between 4.50 and 6.00 when the total is between 8 and 9.5?

[LT Profits]

Almost forgot [/sarcasm]

[Dark Horse]

You mean you don't put much credence in how teams do on a Wednesday when favored by between -125 and -150 and coming off of a win while playing on grass vs. a pitcher with an ERA between 4.50 and 6.00 when the total is between 8 and 9.5?

lol


I feel for them, because they could have evolved (but did not).

[Wrecktangle]

I've never used them. Even thought they have a slick site, I've just felt that using the the service of anyone whose business model is essentially based on the utilization of angles is doomed to failure.

[pats3peat]

do you guys use any angles you feel are useful on statfox? Do you use it get a feel sometimes?

[Venkman]

It's my first season handicapping baseball and i find that their power ratings have been helpful. I don't really look at their super situations to much. I look at the overall stars (super sit., power matchups, situational). Then how the team has done previous 7 days ( w/l, bullpen, batting, etc....). Then i look at starting pitcher vs team. I also use covers matchups.

[Venkman]

do you guys use any angles you feel are useful on statfox? Do you use it get a feel sometimes?

I sometimes play the five or six star angles