Oregon -3.5 B1G Champion

[darrell74]

Leaning this way.
Penn State has a tendency to get humiliated by the good teams, as they unnecessarily humiliated Maryland last Saturday

I'll look at the injuries that morning, but honestly, I would lay as many as 8.5 if I had to. 2+scores, back door slammed shut.

[SBR Andy]

I agree. Think Oregon wins by 7+, can never trust Franklin in a big game.

[ChuckyTheGoat]

GL, guys. Andy, it's so true. My only question is whether Franklin can beat a team not named Mich/OhioSt.

I've thought of Oregon as a tough team to evaluate this season. Putting me in the camp of seeing Oregon as being overrated:
*They struggled to put Idaho away. Probably should have lost to Boise.
*Duck schedule has mostly been favorable. Buckeyes had to travel west.
*Gabriel is NOT the most dominant QB (imho). His arm-strength is mediocre.
*This PennSt defense will challenge him.

It's a great matchup. No opinion ATS. But I don't think it's a slam-dunk.

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Leaning this way.
Penn State has a tendency to get humiliated by the good teams, as they unnecessarily humiliated Maryland last Saturday

I'll look at the injuries that morning, but honestly, I would lay as many as 8.5 if I had to. 2+scores, back door slammed shut.

Darrell, if you lay it, Good Luck. I always root for guys to cash (if I don't have action on the other side).

[SundanceKid]

Love it. Oregon lost this game last year to Pennix, who may very well save the Falcons's season after Kirk implodes on Sunday. I don't see Allar from Penn State making the plays down field. He will get some runs for first downs but I just see the explosive plays from PSU on Saturday.

[darrell74]

Im also leaning on 2 team ml parlay Boise State and Oregon

Plus money that's easy money, is the best money
My personal favorite quote

[darrell74]

Darrell, if you lay it, Good Luck. I always root for guys to cash (if I don't have action on the other side).

[Eddy Munny]

I think Penn State reverses the narrative that they can't win the big game.

[darrell74]

Spam

[Slurry Pumper]

Penn States pass D got smoked several times this year from much lesser foes. As an alumni, it pains me to say that I have been viewing all the games this year and every year for that matter. I got Oregon -3 last week right when the line came out. I am probably adding to it still at 3.5.

[Eddy Munny]

Penn States pass D got smoked several times this year from much lesser foes. As an alumni, it pains me to say that I have been viewing all the games this year and every year for that matter. I got Oregon -3 last week right when the line came out. I am probably adding to it still at 3.5.

Don't bother handicapping this game. It's one of those end-of-the-year tilts where all your data points go out the window. I think Penn State wants it more, there's no science to it... I think PSU keeps it very close if not wins outright.

[darrell74]

Oregon -5.5 +120
Why not?

[darrell74]

7-0 first drive
LFG!!!

[actiondan]

oregon or nothing

[actiondan]

psu will always be frauds until further notice

[actiondan]

if you bet psu you’re a fn retardd. seacreast out

[DJK]

Well, here comes Penn State.

I planned on betting PSU, but since I won on Georgia already I'm just chilling and watching.

Thing with PSU is that they cannot beat Michigan or OSU, but they can beat others who are higher ranked.

[DJK]

At least James Franklin wasn't a chicken shit that time and went for it instead of punting.

[actiondan]

party! ducks! penn state cant hang with the big boys

[Eddy Munny]

party! ducks! penn state cant hang with the big boys

They did hang though. There's a reason you didn't chirp until the game concluded after premature ejaculating in the 1st quarter.

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Oregon -5.5 +120
Why not?

Nice hit, darrell. Covering the Alt-line, can't beat that.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

They did hang though. There's a reason you didn't chirp until the game concluded after premature ejaculating in the 1st quarter.

Bottom line: he called it right, you called it wrong.

[Eddy Munny]

Bottom line: he called it right, you called it wrong.

Yeah, he called it in the 2nd quarter, dumbass.

Bottom line: you're a drunk horse banger.

[actiondan]

i guess they did hang. i was surrounded by lions fans today and chirped too much, sorry eddy. peace and love

[darrell74]

Thanks for the positive Chucky the greatest of all time
LFG!

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Thanks for the positive Chucky the greatest of all time
LFG!

You bet. Have a great Sunday.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

Yeah, he called it in the 2nd quarter, dumbass.

Bottom line: you're a drunk horse banger.

Okay, maybe he posted UO or nothing late but you were stupid enough to babble about throwing data points out when the most obvious "data point" was staring you right in the face, that being that Penn St. doesn't cover against the elite teams. Next tine think with your head, not your ass if you can tell them apart.

[Eddy Munny]

Okay, maybe he posted UO or nothing late but you were stupid enough to babble about throwing data points out when the most obvious "data point" was staring you right in the face, that being that Penn St. doesn't cover against the elite teams. Next tine think with your head, not your ass if you can tell them apart.

It was a coin flip contest, you goober. Of course you fall for the lazy, armchair narrative of PSU in big games because you're a casual who devours round table fluff, but the Nittany Lions had over 500 yards of total offense against the #1 team in the country.

I would take +3.5 one-hundred percent of the time in that situation and live with the results. That's the difference between someone who understands the game, and some derp like you who glances at the final score and strokes himself off. It's not like you had the Ducks anyways, you can't bet with food stamps.

It doesn't even matter, everything I said is over your head because you're a wretched, tired, old degenerate who is so dumbed down that you actually aspire to Johnny Vegas' level and routinely praise him. Let that sink in.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

It wasn't a coin flip at all, it was a great bet based upon a legitimate theory that has been proven correct. You'd take +3.5 100% of the time because you're a "be different just to be different so everyone looks at me" shithead. As I said before regarding JV, if you're going to slam him when he loses then give him props when he wins you fool.

[Eddy Munny]

It wasn't a coin flip at all, it was a great bet based upon a legitimate theory that has been proven correct. You'd take +3.5 100% of the time because you're a "be different just to be different so everyone looks at me" shithead. As I said before regarding JV, if you're going to slam him when he loses then give him props when he wins you fool.

Lmao, what game were you watching? It was absolutely a coin flip. The Ducks made the interception on 2nd and 1 (WR narrowly missing the deflection) to seal the game, whereas earlier Gabriel fumbled the ball on a sack but good fortune fell to Oregon on this night and they retained possession. It really boils down to something that simple.

You're a complete asshat. The Nittany Lions matched or exceeded the Ducks in every meaningful metric except turnovers, which tend to be random and don't carryover. So yes, absolutely I would take +3.5 one-hundred percent of the time.

PSU could have survived a -1 turnover game last night and covered, but -2 (including a pick-six) was too much to overcome. It has nothing to do with "look at me" it has everything to do with common sense. You're just dense, I wouldn't expect you to understand.

[Spite]

They did hang though

Not really. They had it within a touchdown a couple of times but I never felt the -3.5 was going to lose at any point in the contest. When guy threw the INT to end the game I was not the least bit surprised. I would have been shocked if Chester State scored there.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

Lmao, what game were you watching? It was absolutely a coin flip. The Ducks made the interception on 2nd and 1 (WR narrowly missing the deflection) to seal the game, whereas earlier Gabriel fumbled the ball on a sack but good fortune fell to Oregon on this night and they retained possession. It really boils down to something that simple.

You're a complete asshat. The Nittany Lions matched or exceeded the Ducks in every meaningful metric except turnovers, which tend to be random and don't carryover. So yes, absolutely I would take +3.5 one-hundred percent of the time.

PSU could have survived a -1 turnover game last night and covered, but -2 (including a pick-six) was too much to overcome. It has nothing to do with "look at me" it has everything to do with common sense. You're just dense, I wouldn't expect you to understand.

Oregon was in control the entire way. Sure, they got a break here and there but you can almost always find things like that going both for and against each team and that doesn't count the fact that good teams tend to create their own breaks. BTW, shithead; Oregon beat PSU in one meaningful metric that you conveniently didn't mention: that would be the one that counts....you know, the score?

[Eddy Munny]

Not really. They had it within a touchdown a couple of times but I never felt the -3.5 was going to lose at any point in the contest. When guy threw the INT to end the game I was not the least bit surprised. I would have been shocked if Chester State scored there.

Penn State was carving them up. The 2nd and 1 call was questionable but I understand it, taking a deep shot knowing you could come back and pick up a 1st down if it didn't connect. The interception obviously killed it, but nobody would have been shocked had Penn State scored on that possession.

I think it's disingenous to suggest that it was never in doubt. A touchdown there and the Lions either tie the game on a two-point conversion, or miss the conversion and cover the spread, which would've been the more desirable result for PSU backers.

Both defenses had their hands full, Oregon scoring first and getting an early pick-six meant they established some margin and the dog had to play catch-up all night, but if they play that game 10 times, it's not crazy to posit PSU could win 5 of those outright, and cover the spread in at least 6. That's all I'm saying. I would take +3.5 every single time.

[Eddy Munny]

You're a fukkin fool. You slame everyone else for stupidity when they lose then come up with the classic if, if, if but crap when you make a clearly foolish bet and predictably lose. Quit taking betting advice from your boyfriend/avatar you monkey-brained fool.

You're missing the point. I've already accepted the loss. You don't understand how gambling works which is why you're a chronic loser. I'm blaming nobody... There's no blame to be had. I'm refuting the notion that the bet was dead on arrival or had no chance or however you want to spin it.

Gambling is probability based and I'm positing that it's not unreasonable to believe the dog would cover this spread at least 60% of the time, maybe a touch more. That is where I'd place my chips every single time. Obviously 60% isn't 100% so you get what you get.

You wanted to play grab-ass with someone who was lauding for the Ducks after they'd already established a double digit lead in the 2nd quarter. You want to play grab-ass with Johnny Vegas when he connects on 1 out of every 10 bets. You continually fail to comprehend elementary ideas and fail at making cogent arguments, which is why I've determined that you're an idiot.

If you have any evidence to counter the assertion that you're an idiot I haven't seen it yet.

[DrunkHorseplayer]

First you called it a coin flip, now you're saying 60%. Which one is it, dumbass?