1. 04-30-12 11:55 PM #1
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    Proof that MLB games are rigged

    Homeplate umpire tonight in SD was a real piece of work... Called a perfect strikeout pitch a ball so Braun could get another AB, possibly to hit 4HR in 1 night..

    The Padres pitchers choose to pitch to Braun every time, with 1st base open (he already hit 3HR) ...Teams just DONT DO THAT

    This is fkking ridiculous sideshow game to pad Brauns stats
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-01-12 12:00 AM #2
    MagicDiceFlow
    blinded by nostalgia
    MagicDiceFlow's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-15-12
    Posts: 4,585
    Betpoints: 1

    dont worry , au natural Braun will still end up hitting just 25 HR and batting .270 this year.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-01-12 12:51 AM #3
    BigPage25
    BigPage25's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-17-12
    Posts: 3,571
    Betpoints: 1

    Just because you lost you want to put the blame on the umpires... i bet if it was the brewers you bet on you would of been happy with the umpires call
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-01-12 12:53 AM #4
    Johnny Demonic
    Johnny Demonic's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-30-12
    Posts: 14
    Betpoints: 0

    You are really going to try to claim that this is "proof that MLB games are rigged"?

    Because the umpire (in your opinion) missed a strike call? Umpires miss calls all the time. It is not proof of anything, other than they are human beings, not machines.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 05-01-12 01:26 AM #5
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    If anyone watched the ball 4 call it was a strike right down the middle-a batters wheelhouse...forget about that...why would SD pitchers keep pitching to Braun? that's what is so obvious here. Almost like the entire SD team was trying to lose the game.

    dont give me any of that they're just humans crap. noone in their right mind would risk 4HR by 1 batter in their own ballpark.. they're just humans fckoff
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 05-01-12 01:32 AM #6
    BigPage25
    BigPage25's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-17-12
    Posts: 3,571
    Betpoints: 1

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbawks View Post
    If anyone watched the ball 4 call it was a strike right down the middle-a batters wheelhouse...forget about that...why would SD pitchers keep pitching to Braun? that's what is so obvious here. Almost like the entire SD team was trying to lose the game.

    dont give me any of that they're just humans crap. noone in their right mind would risk 4HR by 1 batter in their own ballpark.. they're just humans fckoff
    Its highly frustrating to lose your bets huh
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 05-01-12 01:35 AM #7
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    i have no problem losing a few bets. there's just no chance that was ball 4, and anyone involved in baseball knows to walk a batter when they hit 2-3 consecutive bombs.

    you can say im frustrated but noone has even mentioned the premise of this thread, because its an impossible series of events that don't ever happen in major league baseball.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 05-01-12 01:52 AM #8
    wakeboardr886
    wakeboardr886's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-09-10
    Posts: 453
    Betpoints: 7877

    Someone is on their period
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 05-01-12 01:57 AM #9
    Smutbucket
    Smutbucket's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-14-08
    Posts: 3,956
    Betpoints: 13748

    Im glad I had money on brewcrew and im glad I picked the right side of the rig! haha get over it and learn to cap on the side of the winners who rig it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 05-01-12 01:57 AM #10
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    i notice things most people miss, thought i would share..but you probably didn't watch the 9th inning just trolling
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 05-01-12 01:59 AM #11
    MatI
    MatI's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-17-11
    Posts: 5,200
    Betpoints: 7480

    The real question should be. Why the hell were you on the Padres?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 05-01-12 02:11 AM #12
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    Quote Originally Posted by MatI View Post
    The real question should be. Why the hell were you on the Padres?
    l2 meetings with wolf starting, 23 Padres runs scored.

    why weren't you on SD? line movement and history clearly showed SD was the play
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 05-01-12 02:34 AM #13
    Johnny Demonic
    Johnny Demonic's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-30-12
    Posts: 14
    Betpoints: 0

    Yea SD clearly was the play.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 05-01-12 02:50 AM #14
    frogsrangers
    Zackary > Angelito
    frogsrangers's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-25-12
    Posts: 5,792
    Betpoints: 5421

    It was a terrible call, I agree it was a strike, but I wouldn't touch the Padres with a 10 foot pole this year.

    With that being said, I think Braun juiced and will not hit 20 HRs this year. Tonight was a fluke
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 05-01-12 02:51 AM #15
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    U would have to have no knowledge of the mlb t back wolf tonight. Congtaulations if u took Milwaukee but u didn't and r trolling like true sbr loser
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 05-01-12 03:12 AM #16
    MatI
    MatI's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-17-11
    Posts: 5,200
    Betpoints: 7480

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbawks View Post
    l2 meetings with wolf starting, 23 Padres runs scored.

    why weren't you on SD? line movement and history clearly showed SD was the play
    So you don't rate Wolf, but you will take Wieland? You would rather take a rookie who hasn't a single win to his name? Wolf had one start against Padres last year, any previous years don't really factor into the decision IMO, and even last year should not be the main indicator.

    Give me an experienced pitcher over a win-less rookie any day.

    And line movement is not everything and will not clearly indicate anything.
    Last edited by MatI; 05-01-12 at 03:32 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Baseball Betting | Next Thread »