Originally posted by L8night
trickle down not working
Collapse
X
-
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#71Good catch. I try to always use leftist sources. I have always been a CNBC fan from back in the days when they were moderates and non-political. I bet they wished they stayed there as their audience has long since moved to Fox.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#72man this is so easy David stockman Budget director of ron reagan. Also thomas sowell was a economist that subscribed to ths. Shea get out of your mom's basement.Originally posted by ByeSheaMaybe you can enlighten everyone and name the economist who espouses "trickle down" economics?
No, of course you cannot. This is because "trickle down" isn't an economic policy, it's an inexact criticism of economic policies that would favor deregulated playing fields.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#73by the way you don't need to be an economist to be in charge of an economy.
Budget and fiscal managers work with an organization's various departments and management staff to oversee the complete financial management of a company. They analyze budget proposals and legal parameters from all departments, estimate future demands, compare data and determine availability of funds.Comment -
khicks26SBR Aristocracy
- 09-16-06
- 44208
#74Thought it started with Milton Friedman & the Chicago School. The call it supply side, but its not. Supply Side is tax cuts for all. Trickle Down is tax cuts for mostly the rich.Originally posted by chico2663man this is so easy David stockman Budget director of ron reagan. Also thomas sowell was a economist that subscribed to ths. Shea get out of your mom's basement.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#76pretty sure it was hubert humphrey. But he said not 1 economist . I gave him the budget director during reagan's term. Not stating who started it. Sorry for not clarifying .Originally posted by khicks26Thought it started with Milton Friedman & the Chicago School. The call it supply side, but its not. Supply Side is tax cuts for all. Trickle Down is tax cuts for mostly the rich.Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#77You're both wrong.Originally posted by chico2663pretty sure it was hubert humphrey. But he said not 1 economist . I gave him the budget director during reagan's term. Not stating who started it. Sorry for not clarifying .
Wally Heller was a liberal Dem who was the architect of tax cuts to promote growth.
It seems surreal that Dems were once the champions of cutting taxes.Comment -
vitterdRestricted User
- 09-14-17
- 59265
#78I see trump is planning on a middle class tax cut after the midterms. I thought we already did that? Are you ready to concede that first “Tax cut” was a failure.Originally posted by RoyBaconYou're both wrong.
Wally Heller was a liberal Dem who was the architect of tax cuts to promote growth.
It seems surreal that Dems were once the champions of cutting taxes.Comment -
L8nightSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-04-13
- 5535
#79Actually he said that it would be put in place by the end of October ?? isn't congress out??Originally posted by vitterdI see trump is planning on a middle class tax cut after the midterms. I thought we already did that? Are you ready to concede that first “Tax cut” was a failure.
here's the link
Comment -
vitterdRestricted User
- 09-14-17
- 59265
#80Who knows. He lies so much that you never know. But I thought the middle class already got a tax cut?Originally posted by L8nightActually he said that it would be put in place by the end of October ??Comment -
khicks26SBR Aristocracy
- 09-16-06
- 44208
#81HA Dumb Ass Trump admitting his first Tax Cut was for rich people. 83% for the rich to be exact.Originally posted by vitterdI see trump is planning on a middle class tax cut after the midterms. I thought we already did that? Are you ready to concede that first “Tax cut” was a failure.Comment -
vitterdRestricted User
- 09-14-17
- 59265
#83Pelosi saying middle class received crumbs....she was overstating. They didn’t even get that.Originally posted by khicks26HA Dumb Ass Trump admitting his first Tax Cut was for rich people. 83% for the rich to be exact.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#84problem with the left who wants to look at pocahantas sp, pelosi and schumer. Give some new blood instead of these relicsComment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#85They switched parties. I guess you didn't hear thatOriginally posted by RoyBaconYou're both wrong.
Wally Heller was a liberal Dem who was the architect of tax cuts to promote growth.
It seems surreal that Dems were once the champions of cutting taxes.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#86Originally posted by RoyBaconYou're both wrong.
Wally Heller was a liberal Dem who was the architect of tax cuts to promote growth.
It seems surreal that Dems were once the champions of cutting taxes.
Vice presidential campaign[edit]
Humphrey's defeat in 1960 had a profound influence on his thinking; after the primaries he told friends that, as a relatively poor man in politics, he was unlikely to ever become President unless he served as Vice President first.[106] Humphrey believed that only in this way could he attain the funds, nationwide organization, and visibility he would need to win the Democratic nomination. So as the 1964 presidential campaign began, Humphrey made clear his interest in becoming Lyndon Johnson's running mate. At the 1964 Democratic National Convention, Johnson kept the three likely vice-presidential candidates, Connecticut Senator Thomas Dodd, fellow Minnesota Senator Eugene McCarthy, and Humphrey,[107] as well as the rest of the nation, in suspense before announcing his choice of Humphrey with much fanfare, praising his qualifications at considerable length before announcing his name.[108]
The following day Humphrey's acceptance speech overshadowed Johnson's own acceptance address:Hubert warmed up with a long tribute to the President, then hit his stride as he began a rhythmic jabbing and chopping at Barry Goldwater. "Most Democrats and Republicans in the Senate voted for an $11.5 billion tax cut for American citizens and American business," he cried, "but not Senator Goldwater. Most Democrats and Republicans in the Senate – in fact four-fifths of the members of his own party – voted for the Civil Rights Act, but not Senator Goldwater."
Time after time, he capped his indictments with the drumbeat cry: "But not Senator Goldwater!" The delegates caught the cadence and took up the chant. A quizzical smile spread across Humphrey's face, then turned to a laugh of triumph. Hubert was in fine form. He knew it. The delegates knew it. And no one could deny that Hubert Humphrey would be a formidable political antagonist in the weeks ahead.[109]
Please roy don't argue history with me. roy humphrey came before Reagan. But humphrey got this passed thru congress right before he took the oath of vice president.
Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#87roy do you practice being wrong this muchOriginally posted by RoyBaconYou're both wrong.
Wally Heller was a liberal Dem who was the architect of tax cuts to promote growth.
It seems surreal that Dems were once the champions of cutting taxes.
wally heller said they won't work. I guess you need to start proof reading before you post.
Roy sometimes it is better to be quiet and have us think you are a fool. Instead of opening you yapper and proving us right.Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#88Tards like you saying tax cuts don't work is the real lie.
Why do you hate The People keeping more of their money?
This is the 3rd major tax cut and everyone has worked brilliantly. You have 200,000+ a month coming off food stamps, wages rising above inflation for the 1st time since you were a kid. There are 7.1 million job openings out there, double the amount Obama averaged.
When do you tards scratch your heads and say; yea, I guess they do work?Comment -
d2betsBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-10-05
- 39847
#89Yes. That's what you get from a pathological liar.Originally posted by L8nightActually he said that it would be put in place by the end of October ?? isn't congress out??
here's the link
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...idterms-925383Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44644
#90lol go find a mirror you idiotOriginally posted by d2betsYes. That's what you get from a pathological liar.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44644
#91and again khicks loses an argument and buries his head in the sand. Trends.
Originally posted by brooks85
those are not answers to my question. So again, you've proven you have nothing and that you are wrong. More importantly the answers is NO WAY help your case lol
wrong that has nothing to do with it and is just a personal opinion you're desperately hoping will hold water. It will not.
if you'd like to try again go ahead. Try answering the questions even though you know they prove you wrong. Be adult for once.
"when rich people build $400 million hotel's what would you call it and what section of the "classes" do you think are actually building it? "Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#92Uh little buddy there is no "us".
Your tard buddies think you are bipolar for pretending to be a republican.
But yes, Kennedy rather lib staff engineered the 1st major tax cut which all tards voted for. The majority of tards also voted for Reagan's. You can look that up.
At least you learn some good stuff hanging out here.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44644
#93keep running khicks.Originally posted by brooks85and again khicks loses an argument and buries his head in the sand. Trends.
Khicks posted one of the dumbest things ever and really proves he knows nothing about the basics of economics. He said the goal of capitalism is to have the people who built an item be the ones who use it... so a $400 million hotel should be built by the elites... lol
it's like talking to a kid about economics. Just penetrating stupid but funny because they are a kid.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36993
#94Comment -
rkelly110BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-05-09
- 39410
#95IDK, seems everyone who tried it has put their states if financial peril. And I mean everyone, Maybe it's only a fed thingy.Originally posted by RoyBaconTards like you saying tax cuts don't work is the real lie.
Why do you hate The People keeping more of their money?
This is the 3rd major tax cut and everyone has worked brilliantly. You have 200,000+ a month coming off food stamps, wages rising above inflation for the 1st time since you were a kid. There are 7.1 million job openings out there, double the amount Obama averaged.
When do you tards scratch your heads and say; yea, I guess they do work?Comment -
dante1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-31-05
- 38658
#96khicks forgot more than you will ever know.Originally posted by brooks85keep running khicks.
Khicks posted one of the dumbest things ever and really proves he knows nothing about the basics of economics. He said the goal of capitalism is to have the people who built an item be the ones who use it... so a $400 million hotel should be built by the elites... lol
it's like talking to a kid about economics. Just penetrating stupid but funny because they are a kid.
so let me see since you are writing about econ you must have a ton of knowledge on the subject. my question to you is basic and you should answer this in seconds. what is the main problem economists, are attempting to solve, go ahead tell us. and if you would have been paying attention years ago I answered this question. but I will wager you were not paying attention.
so again, the basic number one problem economists are attempting to solve--go ahead.
I claim my friends he will not reply or reply with handfuls of BS.Comment -
dante1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-31-05
- 38658
#97let me write this again.
BS TO COME OR NOTHING AT ALL.Comment -
dante1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-31-05
- 38658
#98that is the answer in a nutshell. If the working class received 82% of the cuts and not the other way around the strategy would have a much better chance of working. however, when the very wealthy become even more wealthy they often don't spend it and outcome helps the middle class much less than desired. this is basic econ.Originally posted by vitterdPelosi saying middle class received crumbs....she was overstating. They didn’t even get that.Comment -
dante1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-31-05
- 38658
#99ask this handjob a question, even when the question is a subject he implies he has some knowledge about, and the answer is BS, or no answer. his knowledge about economics is equivalent to his knowledge about everything--ZERO. you want a great example, just read the last two sentences this idiot produced. read those a few times, especially the very last sentence and ask yourself...is this the type of "sentence" produced by an individual that has a fckin clue about anything, anything at all.Originally posted by brooks85keep running khicks.
Khicks posted one of the dumbest things ever and really proves he knows nothing about the basics of economics. He said the goal of capitalism is to have the people who built an item be the ones who use it... so a $400 million hotel should be built by the elites... lol
it's like talking to a kid about economics. Just penetrating stupid but funny because they are a kid.
again brooks, tell us the main problem faced by all economists, still waiting.Comment -
dante1BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-31-05
- 38658
#100Originally posted by brooks85keep running khicks.
Khicks posted one of the dumbest things ever and really proves he knows nothing about the basics of economics. He said the goal of capitalism is to have the people who built an item be the ones who use it... so a $400 million hotel should be built by the elites... lol
it's like talking to a kid about economics. Just penetrating stupid but funny because they are a kid.
beating a dead horse, yes.
however, I defy anyone of you including the idiot himself (brooks) or his twin dwightie to define..."but funny because THEY are a kid." this man, Mr Brooks is possibly as stupid as his twin brother dwightie. I know most of you find that difficult to believe, I am simply writing that it is possible.
what is truly sad is this clown knows I will be examing his comments for stupidity, he knows this and still cannot help himself. so, in other words, my friends this is the very best this idiot can produce. when you are reading his BS remind yourself this is his very best. again, I thank, almost daily, the political gods for tossing the true idiots on the heap of garbage labeled Republicans.Comment -
L8nightSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-04-13
- 5535
#101hey danteOriginally posted by dante1beating a dead horse, yes.
however, I defy anyone of you including the idiot himself (brooks) or his twin dwightie to define..."but funny because THEY are a kid." this man, Mr Brooks is possibly as stupid as his twin brother dwightie. I know most of you find that difficult to believe, I am simply writing that it is possible.
what is truly sad is this clown knows I will be examing his comments for stupidity, he knows this and still cannot help himself. so, in other words, my friends this is the very best this idiot can produce. when you are reading his BS remind yourself this is his very best. again, I thank, almost daily, the political gods for tossing the true idiots on the heap of garbage labeled Republicans.
I left you a post in your "one of the better article thread", you probably didn't see it, because Brooks left his footprints on itComment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22277
#102and of course u never mention one thing about the deficit and debt. You see Roy when u purchase something u pay for it in my world. I wonder how many bankruptcy u have had. The weak way out just like trickle-down economics. We all said give it time and once again u are seeing it become an utter failure but im sure ten years from now a clown like u will be touting it once again. Wash, rinse, and repeat.Originally posted by RoyBaconTards like you saying tax cuts don't work is the real lie.
Why do you hate The People keeping more of their money?
This is the 3rd major tax cut and everyone has worked brilliantly. You have 200,000+ a month coming off food stamps, wages rising above inflation for the 1st time since you were a kid. There are 7.1 million job openings out there, double the amount Obama averaged.
When do you tards scratch your heads and say; yea, I guess they do work?Comment -
RoyBaconBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-21-05
- 37074
#103Dems don’t care about it.
In all the Dem debates in 2016 the deficit was mentioned Zero times. ZERO.
Tax cuts have lifted 10s of millions of Americans up. We have to be honest about it.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
