Sets wagering. Something I've been noticing with some books

[Bet10Heinekens]

good luck to us

I put in Knapp instead of Kanepi

[matt1216]

I put in Knapp instead of Kanepi

Ahh shit, well hopefully she hits too. Maybe standby live wagering, I think I had that match going 3 sets

[matt1216]

Play # 58

Not Karlovic in 3 sets. Another indoor tournament that Karlovic needs to try and take advantage of. If he dosnt win in straight sets it's because he can't touch ebdens serve. One of those play the dog if you think Ivo/ebden goes 3 sets

[matt1216]

Play # 60

Baghdatis 1st set winner 1.67

[matt1216]

Play # 61

Not Volandri in 3 sets. If indeed Capt Zclown Volandri Riggs a set he may win in 3 but going with the trend. If it goes 3 sets, by the book take Garin

[matt1216]

Play # 62

Not Lacko in 3 sets. Not Becker in 2 sets. Ones of those matches where there giving me two sets.

[matt1216]

Play #63

Not Dimitrov in 3 sets.

[Bet10Heinekens]

Hey Matt, if you're awake, what does your trend say for the Jano/Benny match

looking to go Jano 2-0 sets

[matt1216]

Hey Matt, if you're awake, what does your trend say for the Jano/Benny match

looking to go Jano 2-0 sets

I will look

[matt1216]

Play # 64

Not Janowicz in 3 sets. Head to Head Jano leads 2-0 and Benny is in shit form yet Jano is 1.50 ML. Line seems a bit weird to me.

[Bet10Heinekens]

Play # 64

Not Janowicz in 3 sets. Head to Head Jano leads 2-0 and Benny is in shit form yet Jano is 1.50 ML. Line seems a bit weird to me.

Damn I lock in my play

J.J. been solid since Davis Cup play

[matt1216]

Damn I lock in my play

J.J. been solid since Davis Cup play

Good luck man, just seems like the line is a bit off. I figured Jano 1.40 would be more appropriate

[freshguy222]

hey matt,

could you elaborate for once what you think is the best play for example for 'Not Dimitrov in 3 sets'? I think Dimitrov TT Under 12.5 is the best option.

[jessetk313]

Petkovic really put up a fight today!! I keep winding up on the wrong end of these WTA players that don't want to play! Petkovic, stephens, sharapova two weeks ago..

[jessetk313]

Well she fought back and was up 40-15 a chance to break back to even crumbled. Then had advantage twice and crumbled..just not my day on that one.. Tough one on the cibulkova retirement Matt I think she woulda pulled that out 2-0

[DownTheLine]

Play # 64

Not Janowicz in 3 sets. Head to Head Jano leads 2-0 and Benny is in shit form yet Jano is 1.50 ML. Line seems a bit weird to me.

There are concerns with Jano health once again from previous tournament (books tend to over adjust sometimes for things like this) and his motivation is always in question.

[matt1216]

There are concerns with Jano health once again from previous tournament (books tend to over adjust sometimes for things like this) and his motivation is always in question.

Thanks, this should clear things up a bit. Yeah I wouldn't touch him in 2 sets

[matt1216]

Well she fought back and was up 40-15 a chance to break back to even crumbled. Then had advantage twice and crumbled..just not my day on that one.. Tough one on the cibulkova retirement Matt I think she woulda pulled that out 2-0

Oh for sure

[matt1216]

hey matt,

could you elaborate for once what you think is the best play for example for 'Not Dimitrov in 3 sets'? I think Dimitrov TT Under 12.5 is the best option.

Since it's indoor I would say 2-0 Dimitrov

[matt1216]

Play # 49

Not Kanepi in 3 sets. I seem to jinx this shit everytime when I say 2-0 sets so I'm just going to leave it at this. She has the game to win in straights

Hit

[matt1216]

so far the trend is 6-1 today with Bouchard 2-0 and the parlay open.

[Hart]

Hit

What hits? What's the play when you say "somebody" not in 3 sets?
Sometimes you say under and then somewhere else you say take the dog, that's just so frigging confusing.

[thetitanlb]

Yeah I am a little confused by that as well

[jessetk313]

Bouchard crumbled at the end of the first set getting broken her last two service games. That is just pathetic. Today is not my day. I need to stop with WTA all it does is disappoint and piss me off.

[matt1216]

What hits? What's the play when you say "somebody" not in 3 sets?
Sometimes you say under and then somewhere else you say take the dog, that's just so frigging confusing.

dude it's a trend for god sakes. I don't know what's gonna win. If I say Karlovic won't in in 3 sets it means he dosnt win in 3 sets. He wins in 2 sets.

[Hart]

dude it's a trend for god sakes. I don't know what's gonna win. If I say Karlovic won't in in 3 sets it means he dosnt win in 3 sets. He wins in 2 sets.

Then why you don't state it as 2-0 win? You have plenty of those 2-0 picks, but now you just say not in 3 sets.
There's no consistency in these picks. I don't mean to be rude, I do follow your picks but you make it impossible to follow these picks because there's no way to understand what you mean by these picks.

[riffraff24]

Then why you don't state it as 2-0 win? You have plenty of those 2-0 picks, but now you just say not in 3 sets.
There's no consistency in these picks. I don't mean to be rude, I do follow your picks but you make it impossible to follow these picks because there's no way to understand what you mean by these picks.

I understand them just fine

[riffraff24]

Hey bud, what do you think about Phau +160 to beat Harrison?

[matt1216]

Hey bud, what do you think about Phau +160 to beat Harrison?

Phau played well last week.worth a shot imo

[riffraff24]

Phau played well last week.worth a shot imo

[fitguy67]

hey matt,

could you elaborate for once what you think is the best play for example for 'Not Dimitrov in 3 sets'? I think Dimitrov TT Under 12.5 is the best option.

a very interesting approach...effective, efficient, and unambiguous

[Hart]

I understand them just fine

That's great but us all lesser people it would be great to give some more info on what exactly the pick is.

[SirtySree]

As confusing as the picks are, what Matt told me was just to follow his other thread as these are mere suggestions. They are not plays and are exactly what they stand for. Not someone in 3 sets just means not someone in 3 sets, there is no play out of it. If there is, it will be posted in the other thread.

Well at least that how I understood his explanation. (Although he did say not someone in 3 sets means to play the under which I dnt understand haha)

[CatHawk]

(Although he did say not someone in 3 sets means to play the under which I dnt understand haha)

It takes 6-7 games to win a set. Plus a tie break if needed. If you take the match to go under you are basically saying whether or not it will go to 3 sets or under.

Hypothetical Over/Under 21: If the under is at 21 you'll push if three sets are won by a score of 7 games. If one set goes to 6 you'll hit the under as long as the match is decided in three sets. Two sets would guarantee a win. If it goes to 4 sets you lose. Most matches are prolly less than 21. Not sure on that. If you think a particular player will roll over the other the Under would be good to go. Over/unders will vary depending on the players involved.

I'm a bit new to this tennis betting but I'm pretty sure that's how it goes.

[SirtySree]

It takes 6-7 games to win a set. Plus a tie break if needed. If you take the match to go under you are basically saying whether or not it will go to 3 sets or under.

Hypothetical Over/Under 21: If the under is at 21 you'll push if three sets are won by a score of 7 games. If one set goes to 6 you'll hit the under as long as the match is decided in three sets. Two sets would guarantee a win. If it goes to 4 sets you lose. Most matches are prolly less than 21. Not sure on that. If you think a particular player will roll over the other the Under would be good to go. Over/unders will vary depending on the players involved.

I'm a bit new to this tennis betting but I'm pretty sure that's how it goes.

WTF did I just read lmao